Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Need a confirmation-Seems to me "pr_wh" in an AP URL means

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 01:17 PM
Original message
Need a confirmation-Seems to me "pr_wh" in an AP URL means
that it is a PRESS RELEASE from the WHITE HOUSE.

Even though this is Saturday, I tried calling AP this morning to ask, but will have to call back on Monday to find someone who knows.

Seems logical to me, and if so, then rather than getting excited about the implications of an article being pro-Dem, worth checking WHY the White House would send out a particular piece of PROPAGANDA to the AP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Scout1071 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great catch. The news stops for no one. Surely somebody is at the AP.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, the person I spoke to didn't know, and said to call back on Monday
so I will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. which story are you referring to?
the savings one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The one about Homeland Security raising an objection but it being overcome
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060225/ap_on_go_pr_wh/ports_security

I ask myself WHY, IF this is PR from the White House, this would come out and the conclusion I come to is that it's there to show that although EVEN Homeland Security had objections, they were fine with it after some security measures were passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Don't know, seems reasonable - I did a Yahoo site search for the
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC