Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Revisiting the Watergate Tape Controversy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:56 AM
Original message
Revisiting the Watergate Tape Controversy
Edited on Sat Feb-25-06 09:58 AM by Mr_Jefferson_24
-------------------------------------------

From World Book '99 Multimedia Encyclopedia:

<snip>

Watergate: The Tape Controversy 1973

...They (The Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities) asked Nixon to provide them with certain tapes, but he refused to do so. Nixon argued that, as President, he had the constitutional right to keep the tapes confidential. In August, Archibald Cox (The Special Prosecutor) and the committee sued Nixon to obtain the tapes. U.S. District Court Judge John J. Sirica decided to review the tapes himself and ordered Nixon to give them to him. Nixon appealed the order, but a U.S. court of appeals supported Sirica.

In October, Nixon offered to provide summaries of the tapes. But Cox declared that summaries would be unacceptable as evidence in court and rejected the offer. Nixon ordered Attorney General Elliot L Richardson to fire Cox, but Richardson refused to do so and resigned. Deputy attorney General D. Ruckelshaus also resigned after being ordered to dismiss Cox. Nixon then named Solicitor General Robert H. Bork acting attorney general, and Bork fired Cox. Leon Jaworski, a noted Texas attorney, later succeeded Cox.

The President's actions angered many Americans. In October, a number of members of the House of representatives began steps to impeach him...


---------------------------------------

From truthout.org

White House 'Discovers' 250 Emails Related to Plame Leak
By Jason Leopold
t r u t h o u t | Report

Friday 24 February 2006

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/022406Y.shtml

<snip>

"...Sources close to the case said that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales withheld numerous emails from Fitzgerald’s probe citing “executive privilege” and “national security” concerns. These sources said that as of Friday there are still some emails that have not been turned over to Fitzgerald because they contain classified information in addition to references about the Wilsons."

-----------------------------------------

Nixon couldn't bully Congress and our judiciary in 1973 to get away with obstruction because the American public wouldn't permit it. He couldn't keep the American public from holding him to account because he couldn't control mainstream media, and therein lies the crux of our problem today. Little or no serious, widely seen, investigative reporting means an uninformed, or more often misinformed, public remaining oblivious to the truth. If we don't find some way to recapture some meaningful, widely seen slice of media by which to get the truth out, we will lose the Republic.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. I certainly hope that the Bush admin won't succeed where Nixon failed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC