Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Article the LATimes SCRUBBED: "When writing truth is a crime" IRONY ALERT!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 04:57 AM
Original message
Article the LATimes SCRUBBED: "When writing truth is a crime" IRONY ALERT!
Edited on Sat Feb-25-06 05:01 AM by Nothing Without Hope
Oh, the irony.

I got my emailed LAT contents as usual about an hour ago (email is time-stamped 3:20 AM Saturday and I began writing this post about 4:20 AM) and was pleased and somewhat surprised, given how rarely this topic sees the light in the corporate press, to read this article description:


"When writing truth is a crime"


By Tim Rutten

Seven journalists have been killed in Iraq since Jan. 1, but where is the outrage in Western media?


Here is a screen shot of this portion of the emailed LAT contents - the article is second in the A & E section list:



Sounds like an important, courageous article, even though it is listed in the Arts & Entertainment section. But it's such a widely suppressed topic, and I was so suprised to actually see it listed, I checked the online LA Times immediately.

...and got the following error message:

"Sorry, the page you requested is not available."



I went through the online issue thoroughly and also searched for articles by Tim Rutten (and found some in earlier issues), but the article on the deaths of SEVEN journalists in Iraq since January 1 is not there.

Do I suspect that it was pulled due to pressure to suppress it? I hope it was merely delayed and will show up, say, tomorrow - but yes, I do suspect it was pulled due to political pressure.

Let's write the LA Times and ask them to print this (so far) missing article. Here is contact information:


If you would like to make a comment about a specific news article, editorial or commentary and have it considered for publication in the newspaper as a Letter to the Editor, please send it to letters@latimes.com -- send well-written individual letters only; no group e-mails. Do not send attachments. (Letters regarding Orange County issues specifically should be sent to ocletters@latimes.com.)

Letters should be brief, and may be edited. They become the property of The Times and may be republished in any format. Please include your full name, mailing address and daytime phone number (your number will not be published). For complete guidelines, call (800) LATIMES, Ext. 74511.

Readers' Representative Office

If you have questions or concerns about The Times' journalistic standards and practices (such as story coverage in general), or if you believe we have made an error, then please submit your comment to the Readers' Representative Office (http://www.latimes.com/services/site/la-comment-readersrep,0,1452515.htmlstory?coll=la-mininav-opinion) instead. Thank you.

E-mailing Specific News Departments or Site Sections

If you would like to contact us with a suggestion, story tip or question, or if you would like to report a problem with the website, please click here: http://www.latimes.com/services/site/la-contactus,0,1439615.htmlstory?coll=la-mininav-opinion


So, LA Times, if this article fails to appear in the days to come, that would answer the question in its title: YES, looks like writing truth IS a crime, at least in the minds of some with other priorities. Especially given the volatile situation in Iraq and the fact that the Pentagon is STILL saying that the situation is improving there, eyewitness reporting is not welcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. No one thinks the scrubbing of a story on seven journalists killed in
Iraq since the beginning of the year is signficant?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 05:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. It will only be significant
if the young lady from the Christian Science Monitor is killed. Remember that in Bushco and his corporate media's eyes, only American life counts - to hell with the other insignificant lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 05:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'd hold up for a while
Susan Carpenter's fluff article isn't there either. Could be their website updating and email alert schedules got out of sync.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 05:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Here's the article:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Thank you. That link works for me, but I CAN'T see it anywhere in
the online TImes. The Susan Carpenter fluff piece is there, but I can find this article no where but at the link you gave. How did you get it?

I'm glad to see the story is out there, but I still don't understand why I can't find it in searches of the online LATimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 05:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I found it by title in Yahoo News.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 05:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thank you. False alarm, then. But it shows that the LAT doesn't
always have its web site together. The author listed for the article is an associate editor at the LAT. If it still hasn't shown up at the LAT web site tomorrow, it will wtill be an oddity, but since it's available via Yahoo News, it's not signficant.

Thanks again, Buying Thyme.

And for other people, SORRY, FALSE ALARM! :blush:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 05:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. MSNBC and the NYT have been busted in recent days.
I'm sure there's a lot of this going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. True. If it disappears from Yahoo News, then the suspicion-meter will
start rising again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC