Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FITZGERALD: WH 'RECENTLY LOCATED' 250 PAGES OF EMAILS IN CIA LEAK

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 10:21 PM
Original message
FITZGERALD: WH 'RECENTLY LOCATED' 250 PAGES OF EMAILS IN CIA LEAK
Edited on Fri Feb-24-06 10:24 PM by kpete
Fitzgerald: WH 'recently located'250 pages of emails in CIA leak inquiry

Fitzgerald discloses White House recently turned over 250 pages of emails in CIA leak inquiry
John Byrne
Published: February 24, 2006



Special Prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald said in a court hearing Friday that the White House "recently located and turned over" 250 pages of emails from the Office of Vice President Dick Cheney, according to an article filed by the Associated Press Friday evening.

The AP article focused primarily on the fact that U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton told Vice President's former chief of staff I. Lewis Libby that he was not entitled to know the name of the individual who "outed" CIA officer Valerie Plame Wilson.

Libby was told, however, that he could have copies of notes he took during 2003 and 2004 while he served as Cheney's chief of staff.

...........

In October 2003, then-White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales told all White House employees to turn in copies of numerous documents relating to the CIA leak investigation. It was sent after the Justice Department told the White House to hand over all records that could be relevant to investigators. According to an article at the time, the deadline was Oct. 10, 2003.

The newly-turned over emails could indicate that not all information had been divulged when the Justice Department first required the information be delivered. It could, however, also signify that Fitzgerald is seeking additional email correspondence based on information he obtained during the probe.

http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Fitzgerald_discloses_White_House_recently_turned_0224.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. WOW! kpete, what a news dump!!!!!!
Thx, that makes my weekend!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. "...recently located..."
Yeah, email is hard to find. Sometimes it escapes from your computer like a greyhound at an airport and hides behind boxes in unidentified buildings.

Maybe they need pet psychics over at the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spuddonna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
22. LOL!
My email is always leaking out the mouse port onto the floor...

I'm always finding little 1's and 0's all over the desk...

Yeah, how exactly do you find "250 pages" of emails??!

Gads, I'd love to meet the sys admin that works in this nuthouse...

"I archive all the emails on post-its..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. KPete I must say.....
You're awesome! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. 250 PAGES
thats P A G E S

That's a lot of "missing" emails.

Perhaps it's all jokes forwarded by my Grandmother
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Yep. A half a ream of paper ... after 2.4 years of editing it.
Dump it in the Friday night news black hole - don't want folks talking about it at the office, after all.

I was in MIS/EDP for 35 years. The last I heard, email volume was measured in messages or kilobytes, not 'pages.' I gotta wonder how it looked on the mail server - headers and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. "2.4 years of editing"...you got that right. Scrub a Dub Shrub. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
26. The White House
did not "dump" this in the Friday night news ..... Mr. Fitzgerald said it in open court. There is more going on behind the scenes right now that is not being made public. Fitzgerald had a good reason to make the statement when he did. These e-mails are going to show the structure of the WHIG operation against Plame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #26
43. WHIG, as in Matalin, et al, who were involved
in 'framing' why we should go to war, right? Oh, be still my heart! I truly hope a patriot is doing the right thing! Could this be our 'Deepthroat'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. Yes.
This might also ease some of the concerns about the judge. Keep in mind that the White House had refused to turn over the e-mails for some time. There are a number of things going on in the pre-trial positioning that are off the record. At this point, the judge is going by the ule of law, and that is putting the WHIG on a very hot seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. Thanks, H2O Man, with hope in my heart! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Ha Ha
Your Grandmother or my friend who sends me everything!

"missing" I have over 500 saved emails just from one committee and that is from the last 2 months. Pages, that is a lot of email.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Friday Night ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. thanks for this Kpete!
good job posting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. oop0s!
Edited on Fri Feb-24-06 10:42 PM by TexasLady
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sperk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Is there any way Fitz can check and make sure that they weren't
edited?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
30. Yes,
I believe he has copies of at least some of these emails from the people who received them. That's how he knew they existed and was able to pressure the WH to release them. All he has to do is compare the emails sent, to the ones received, to see if there has been any 'editing'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #30
52. Wow, that's good to know!
If anybody is thorough enough to check that, it's Patrick Fitzgerald.

I almost hope there HAS been editing, just so he can nail them again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. Is there any way to prove ...
Edited on Fri Feb-24-06 10:30 PM by C_U_L8R
that these emails are authentic.. and not forgeries created by the White House??


on edit: I see Sperk has the same concern.... we posted simultaneously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. Riiiight. Now that Roberts and ScAlito are seated on the SCOTUS.
I'm sure the WH will do a HUGE document dump.:grr: rat bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. Weird- I'd posted the AP article in LBN, from the WP wire site, but
changed- to a much edited Saturday paper article.

Here's the new WH document info in the AP piece on the MSNBC site:

snip>
Documents delivered in pouch with key
Walton denied a defense request to stop Fitzgerald from filing information that only the judge can review, such as strategy memos and classified information that he wants withheld from Libby’s legal team. Walton said he needs to see what Fitzgerald is withholding from the defense to ensure the prosecutor is making the correct call.

The defense was told that the White House had recently located and turned over about 250 pages of e-mails from the vice president’s office. Fitzgerald, in a letter last month to the defense, had cautioned Libby’s lawyers that some e-mails might be missing because the White House’s archiving system had failed.

The 2½-hour hearing not only kicked off the battle over how much classified information a jury will hear when Libby’s case goes to trial, but also showed how cumbersome it is to deal with such secret evidence.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/11548045/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spuddonna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. Check this out...
"'Everyone knows'
Libby’s lawyers and Fitzgerald disagreed over whether the unidentified government official — who does not work at the White House — was referring to Plame or her husband when he said, “Everyone knows,” during a taped interview with investigators."

Any guesses who this unidentified govt official is? Do we have lists of who the Grand Jury talked to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. Holy moly! First I've heard of this; the wh must be
scared or intimidated. They actually did the right thing? And 'recently located'?' Puhleeze!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #14
25. It is reason
for DUers to be confident that evertything is okay on the Plame front.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #25
55. Man... What An Unbelievable Yet Real Time We Live In
There is so much info circulating my head feels at times like a spinning top. So much material for art and just not enough time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. He is our only hope
Bless him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. Maybe * ready to dump Cheney and hand-pick successor for '08?
The missing email was suddenly found... Hmmmm... So maybe * finally decided to throw Dead-eye under the bus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
18. Are these the real Emails?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
19. If memory serves me well...
Fitzgerald's 30 page letter to Libby's attorneys mentions emails from the WH that weren't submitted due to an archive problem. But he also hinted that he had them anyway. The WH probably freaked and reluctantly turned them over to avoid obstruction charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spuddonna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
20. I love this gem!
Edited on Sat Feb-25-06 01:01 AM by spuddonna
"The newly-turned over emails could indicate that not all information had been divulged when the Justice Department first required the information be delivered. It could, however, also signify that Fitzgerald is seeking additional email correspondence based on information he obtained during the probe.

In a letter to Libby's lawyers last month, Fitzgerald signaled that not all emails during the period in question were properly archived -- indicating that some documents may have been lost." (Lemme guess, it wasn't just all his "Cialis!" emails...)

Now, this seems to read that Fitz is telling them that he KNOWS not all the emails were archived. How does he know this? There must be a mail server log or some backup evidence that shows these messages were delivered. I wouldn't be surprised if there were backup copies of the actual emails somewhere!

And 250 "pages"? wtf? When do they count emails in "pages"?! They handed them over as a stack of paper? How about on CD or a flash memory key? So bizarre...

ETA: I just read the AP article and noticed something interesting...
"The defense was told that the White House had recently located and turned over about 250 pages of e-mails from the vice president's office. Fitzgerald, in a letter last month to the defense, had cautioned Libby's lawyers that some e-mails might be missing because the White House's archiving system had failed."

The archiving system had 'failed'. Really. How conveeenient! I'd love to know what kind of 'archiving' systems they had...

Hmm, so what does Fitz have on Libby? This is so confusing... or maybe I need more coffee... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #20
27. In many bureaucracies
there are one or two quiet people who gather information of wrong-doing. Put this in its proper context, right alongside of JL's other release, about the DoJ moving a few people who had provided the grand jury with information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #20
29. The Rosemary Wood Archiving System. (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spuddonna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #29
57. lol Exactly.... :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
23. I bet these are a selective set of more emails that will help the WH
Edited on Sat Feb-25-06 06:01 AM by Nothing Without Hope
and others that don't have likely been destroyed. They've had these in reserve in case they were needed - that's my guess.

Will be interesting if they make Cheney look bad - would be more evidence that they really do want to check his power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. "selective"
I will provide a clue of the selection: in December 2003, a senior WH official was quoted in the Financial Times gloating, "We have rolled the earthmovers in over this one." The buried treasure has come to the surface.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. READ MY NEW POST - BY JASON LEOPOLD!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #28
58. I had forgotten that, but I bet Fitz didn't. Wonder who that was.
But somehow, I doubt that ALL the buried evidence implicated ONLY Cheney. There's still buried treasure, that is, if it hasn't been vaporized by now. My suspicion is that they deliberately kept some bombshells under wraps just in case they ever had to control Cheney or bring him down. In fact, his knowledge that they had them may have been a rein all this time.

:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
24. WOW! Jason Leopold's article on the emails says they're EXPLOSIVE and show
Edited on Sat Feb-25-06 06:11 AM by Nothing Without Hope
Cheney had direct involvement and lied to the investigators:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2131403
thread title (2-25-06 LBN): White House 'Discovers’ 250 Emails Related to Plame Leak
Article by Jason Leopold posted at Truthout Friday 24 February 2006.
Excerpt: “The emails are said to be explosive, and may prove that Cheney played an active role in the effort to discredit Plame Wilson’s husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, a vocal critic of the Bush administration’s prewar Iraq intelligence, sources close to the investigation said. Sources close to the probe said the White House “discovered” the emails two weeks ago and turned them over to Fitzgerald last week. The sources added that the emails could prove that Cheney lied to FBI investigators when he was interviewed about the leak in early 2004. Cheney said that he was unaware of any effort to discredit Wilson or unmask his wife’s undercover status to reporters."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
32. How good a reporter is Leopold?
He's had some pretty good stuff the past few weeks, but is he legitimate & accurate?

Not questioning his veracity, but if I send that on to a RW friend, I don't want to get the response that this guy started out at the Weekly World News or similar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. The information reported
by Mr. Leopold on the Plame case is valid and accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. Thanks
It's hard to tell who is good & bad in the media these days without a scorecard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
34. I think Cheney will resign due to 'health reasons'
He is 'suffering' way too much stress from shooting his hunting buddy, he doesn't want to end up with more heart problems
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. I understand
he has been using his cane more frequently in the past couple months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. Maybe it's his gout acting up
using a cane would help alleviate pressure on the joints afflicted with the gout
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. Yep.
I think that, removing the distain we feel for Cheney, it is still important to recognize that shooting someone in the face takes a toll on a person. It is more disturbing if you shoot a friend. Watching the victim of your reckless "error" lie bleeding on the ground, unable to communicate, adds to that. That is a huge factor, along with the other stress that VP DC is dealing with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. McCain is setting himself up to replace Cheney
McCain supports Bush on anything lately.

McCain backs Bush on U.S. seaport deal
http://www.azcentral.com/community/westvalley/articles/0224wvmccain0222Z1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. I agree. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kohodog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #38
47. With Friends like Cheney...
According to reports, he went back to the Ranch and poured himself a stiff one. Personally, I think I'd have gone to the hospital to see how my friend was doing.

No punsihment is too strong for this creep. Then again he has to get up every day and look in the mirror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. Yes, YOU would have. But Cheney didn't want to be CONNECTED
to this story AT ALL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. I still wonder
Edited on Sat Feb-25-06 12:48 PM by Mme. Defarge
if he really WAS the shooter. Here's why:

1) The White House is undoubtedly divided into two camps -- Cheney vs. Bush-Rove.

2) Because of the Plame affair, Cheney has got to be a HUGE liability to the administration, but is also way too powerful.

3) The accident wasn't reported by Cheney, but by Katherine Armstrong, and wasn't reported until the next day.

4) While Cheney and family have a relationship with the Armstrongs, Katherine Armstrong has stated that Mr. Karl Rove is one of her very best friends in the whole wide world.

5) It was apparently Rove and Bush who insisted that Cheney go public with his mea culpa.

6) The timing of and uproar over the shooting incident served to obfuscate the secret port deal that the administration was undoubtedly hoping would stay under the radar screen.

Question. Is it possible that Cheney could have been set up for a fall and coereced to confess to the shooting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #34
42. Agreed. With the way the polls are going, they are going to need
the boost of having an "incumbent" running. Cheney will be gone before the end of Bush's term, so that the Repugs can crown an heir apparent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #34
59. Exactly. "Health reasons." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
41. Thanks kpete. Makes my weekend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
44. MSM covering this yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indie_voter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #44
53. CNN is stuck on Ricin. I haven't heard it mentioned on the others. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
48. White House 'Discovers' 250 Emails Related to Plame Leak

White House 'Discovers' 250 Emails Related to Plame Leak
By Jason Leopold
t r u t h o u t | Report

Friday 24 February 2006

......................

The emails are said to be explosive, and may prove that Cheney played an active role in the effort to discredit Plame Wilson’s husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, a vocal critic of the Bush administration’s prewar Iraq intelligence, sources close to the investigation said.

Sources close to the probe said the White House “discovered” the emails two weeks ago and turned them over to Fitzgerald last week. The sources added that the emails could prove that Cheney lied to FBI investigators when he was interviewed about the leak in early 2004. Cheney said that he was unaware of any effort to discredit Wilson or unmask his wife’s undercover status to reporters.

............

However, the emails say otherwise, and will show that the vice president spearheaded an effort in March 2003 to attack Wilson’s credibility and used the CIA to dig up information on the former ambassador that could be used against him, sources said.

Some of the emails that were turned over to Fitzgerald contained references to Plame Wilson's identity and CIA status, and developments related to the inability of ground forces to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq after the start of the war in March 2003.

According to sources, the emails also contained suggestions by senior officials in Cheney’s office, and at the National Security Council, on how the White House should respond to what it believed were increasingly destructive comments Wilson had been making about the administration's pre-war Iraq intelligence.

lots more at:
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/022406Y.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
51. This means Fitz already had some of them from other sources
probably the recipients of the mail. It was either "discover" them or get charged with destruction of evidence for the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Babel_17 Donating Member (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
54. K&R: Much as they must hate it ....
I think it's no easy task to scrub the system of these e-mails or any others that might later come to light. I'm guessing that the measures used to ensure data integrity would allow a computer forensic expert to eventually detect any such funny business.

Needless to say, technology cuts both ways and some truly skilled "plumbers" once given the go-ahead could make it very hard even for experts to detect a small amount of deletions here and there.

But that would involve a much broader conspiracy and introduces new risks to being discovered.

Thankfully, this is a case where the arrogance and willful ignorance of many in the administration means they haven't a clue as to how their own tools work and thus they are left vulnerable once their inner sanctum is penetrated.

If only this issue could get raised to a level that would force Gonzales to truly cooperate. Or better yet, if Gonzales could be forced out of the loop and in this instance be replaced with a no nonsense non-partisan official.

It all comes down to getting pieces to a puzzle. The climate in Washington and elsewhere that has been enabling this administration might be changing for the better. This administration has excelled at damage control. They appear to be getting overwhelmed and if we can keep the pressure up things might really break loose in favor of the american people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
56. K&R for hope and justice
let them be served!

This is good news, even if it won't be reported in the "news".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreverdem Donating Member (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
60. Thanks kpete!
You made my weekend with this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC