Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Totally stupid CNN poll - worst presidential blunder

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 01:25 PM
Original message
Totally stupid CNN poll - worst presidential blunder
Edited on Sun Feb-19-06 01:25 PM by liberal N proud
What do you think was the worst presidential blunder?

Buchanan / Civil War 29% 27677 votes

Clinton / Lewinsky 24% 22549 votes

Nixon / Watergate 48% 45478 votes
Total: 95704 votes


Why in the hell do they bring up Clinton in such a poll?

http://www.cnn.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bob3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. for balance - their blessed blance bs.
still why no place to vote for say Katrina or 9/11 or the Medicare disaster or Iraq or well you get the idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. I nominate this for "Worst Poll Ever".
First of all, Watergate was a crime, not a "Blunder". And where is "Bush/9-11", and "Bush/Katrina" and "Bush/Iraq" Oh, wait, that was a crime too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. this poll goes out of its way to ask inane questions on purpose.
I check the poll every day and refuse to even vote 98% of the time because the questions are so irrelevant and the scripted responses are loaded. Besides being totally unscientific, I think that CNN is insulting its audience on purpose in an effort to limit any real thinking or response from the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. WTF? Clinton makes that list- and Bush does NOT?
Edited on Sun Feb-19-06 01:44 PM by Marr
That's the stupidest thing I've ever seen. Bush actually has a shot at making the list of "greatest blunderers"- and not just for one thing. He's screwed up repeatedly, on a grand scale. Katrina, Iraq, 9-11, domestic spying, Abu Ghraib, the Plame leak... etc., etc. Any one of those things dwarfs Clinton's affair.

I've never been a Clinton fan- but Jesus, he's nowhere *near* that list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. This comes out of the larger poll on presidential historians.
Edited on Sun Feb-19-06 01:49 PM by txindy
However, CNN chose to highlight those three. Not a coincidence, that.

BTW, the historians chose (A): Buchanan/Civil War. The historians voted on the Top 10 Presidential Blunders and, no, no mention of Junior.

Off to find the link....

Adding: Here it is and GUESS whose picture they 'coincidentally' chose to show at the top of the article! Un-freaking-believable.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060218/ap_on_go_pr_wh/presidential_errors_1

Scholars Rate Worst Presidential Errors

.....(snip)........

So who had the worst blunder? President James Buchanan, for failing to avert the Civil War, according to a survey of presidential historians organized by the University of Louisville's McConnell Center.

.....(snip)........

The second worst mistake, the survey found, was Andrew Johnson's decision just after the Civil War to side with Southern whites and oppose improvements in justice for Southern blacks beyond abolishing slavery.

.....(snip)........

Lyndon Johnson earned the No. 3 spot by allowing the Vietnam War to intensify, Gregg said.

Where does Bill Clinton's Monica Lewinsky scandal rank? Many scholars said it belonged at No. 10, saying that it probably affected Clinton's presidency more than it did American history and the public.

......(snip).......


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. Is there an agenda here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC