|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
jmowreader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 05:25 PM Original message |
Forget the order of succession. Here's how it will really work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogfacedboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
1. It would take less time to get a Dem into the WH in 2008. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cdb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
2. Either way, bad scenarios, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hobbit709 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
3. He could nominate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gidney N Cloyd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
4. Bush (or Cheney as the case may be) can only nominate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
5. Even if we can't get a Democrat in before 2008, I say we |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 05:53 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Oh absolutely. Impeach the shit out of them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 06:28 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Congress was Democratic in 1973 when Agnew resigned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 07:11 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. He also liked shooting golf a lot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 09:28 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. But I think Agnew was more notorious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
6. BUT isn't catkiller on his way to jail for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
7. Appointing a Veep requires advise and consent of the Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 05:43 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 07:19 PM Response to Reply #7 |
16. That's my understanding too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadmessengers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
8. Catkiller would still have to be confirmed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
11. Time is on their side.. and a stacked congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sweetheart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
12. He's doing 134 mph in a 40mph zone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 06:09 PM Response to Original message |
13. No, if we control Congress, we can prevent that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrMonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
18. A partial win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:28 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC