Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think the RNC just pulled a Hackett on one of its own

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 05:59 PM
Original message
I think the RNC just pulled a Hackett on one of its own

www.redstate.com (spit, spit)

Lynn Swann is now unopposed for the Republican gubernorial nomination, as erstwhile opponenent Jim Panyward has dropped out.

In withdrawing, he blamed the State Republican Committee in his snit:

"It is not interested in public policy and answers to the state's multitude of problems, financial, social, educational or otherwise," he said in a statement. "It is interested in winning, principle be damned."

Thing is, Panyard had said that he didn't want the party's endorsement. By doing so, he had rendered his chances of receiving it to nil.

I suspect he lacked funds.

The Republican Party apparatus is indeed interested in winning. That is why we have a State and county committees,

All clear for Swann vs. Rendell.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. How convenient....Lynn Swann, just after the Super Bowl
Gotta give them credit....they're shrewd evil bastards. They'll always play for that lowest common denominator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. "Shrewd evil bastards" seem to exist in both parties...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes....putting up the most viable candidate is indeed shrewd and evil...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. "The most viable candidate"?? Brown's cross-party numbers suck.
Sure, he was ahead in the primary poll that he paid for, but that's not where we need to pick up voters to win in Ohio. Remember 2004? Repubs own this state, granted by a small margin. We need people OTHER than those who vote in the primary to vote for the Dem in November. Do you think Brown is going to be better at that than Hackett would have been?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. I realize this is a nasty thing to say, but...
this guys name would have made him fail anyway! Pantywad??????

I think that's one of the reasons Pinochio is also failing as the Dem candidate running against Casey in PA for Santorum's seat.

Names aren't supposed to affect your life, but, in reality, THEY DO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VonDoomPhd Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Well...
Pennachio's "failing" has little to do with his name and everything to do with the fact that the powers-that-be had already fingered Casey as their republican-lite golden boy.
Also, Casey has the luxury of just sitting back and saying nothing until the homestretch of the general election.
He has nothing to gain and everything to lose should he engage in political discourse with Chuck or Alan Sandels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Any word on Lynn Swann's views?
Edited on Tue Feb-14-06 06:07 PM by Onlooker
Just because he's Republican doesn't mean he's right wing. Any idea what kind of Republican he is? I haven't read anything as to his stand on any issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Very RW - go figure, & very dumb & uninformed, lucky for us.
Trust me, Rendell will eat him for lunch. Ask any PAer (where I was born & majority of my family still lives).

The PA GOP just cleared the way for PA to keep a Dem governor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. That's what they said about Dubya, too!
But, I hope you're right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Swann was on TV this past weekend, he really IS clueless, it was painful
Edited on Tue Feb-14-06 06:48 PM by Justitia
to watch.

Yes, "W" is dumb (I'm a Texan, so I know this all too well, unfortunately), but he went to Washington with a HUGE political machine behind him, having grown up in those circles. He is dumb, but he had been protected in political circles for his whole life.

Swann is completely out of his element. His "backers" are hoping for the "sports star" thing to combine with the "African American" thing - as they need it desperately to win over Philly one day - and ignore the rest.

Not to mention, Rendell is a very popular guv in PA with quite a long political pedigree of his own.
He is also very smart, and incredibly politically savvy.

I was quite encouraged to see it is down to Swann & Rendell, it is hardly a match in any way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. So, you think Swann is being controlled,
has handlers, and will front for.....whom exactly?

Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I don't think it's that well planned. I just think the PA GOP is looking
for a "star" candidate, a la Arnold the "Terminator" in CA, and sports star Swann fits that bill.

I see it more as a desperate move to counter a popular incumbent Gov. by trying to find someone more "popular".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. "It is interested in winning, principle be damned."
Uh, yeah, and the sky is blue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. I know. eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC