Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ohhh I feel...woozy... dizzy... everything's spinning... going dark...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 08:52 PM
Original message
Ohhh I feel...woozy... dizzy... everything's spinning... going dark...
Celebrations as ex-president of Haiti heads for election victory

But even in a country where democracy has often been undermined - most recently in 2004 by the US-backed coup that ousted the elected president, Jean-Bertrand Aristide - the election is only a start.

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article344725.ece

mom cat's OP;
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=2100083&mesg_id=2100083

Ohhhh I feel weird...media telling truth...ohhhh...

*THUD*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Isn't that funny...
We all knew it was a coup, but we couldn't say so at the time. Now that it's a little bit behind us, eh, who cares?

Bizarre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zensea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Before you get too excited
remember it's British media
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes I know it's UK...and they cheerleaded bush's bullshit and
Tony the bLiar's bullshit almost as well as the US "msm" did.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zensea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. True
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Not that most Americans will ever know the fact that BUSH undermined
Edited on Fri Feb-10-06 09:16 PM by LynnTheDem
DEMOCRACY by overthrowing a democratically elected president in 2004...same time he was -and still is- chanting how he's "spreading democracy".

BUT...the rest of the world DOES know. The rest of the world DOES see the utter hypocricy. And they despise us just that much more. And Americans will wonder "why do they hate us...?"

bush; putting the MOCK in Democracy since 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. "bush; putting the MOCK in Democracy since 2000"
:rofl: HA!

Though, perhaps we need a :ROFC: "rolling on floor crying" guy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. OMG I've Never Seen That Line! I'm Gonna Use It Over and Over and Over!!
"bush: putting the MOCK in Democracy since 2000."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. how about putting the bananas in the Republic
Party since 00, I now see it, Bush was Y2K, we should have all hunkered down in
the bunker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I'll NEVER FORGET!!! NEVER!!!
:cry: I could NOT believe OUR GOVERNMENT literally went in and TOOK Aristide. It was horrifying to me.

But, at least, :cry: the US multi-national corporacrats backed by the BushCO/neoCON sponsored black ops didn't assassinate him.

If only the American people knew what these fuckers do in their name!!! If only,...if only they knew. But, they don't,...they are betrayed and exploited, too.

This is it,...this is reality: U.S. corporacrats exploitation. Look at it. Look at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. "the 'mock' in democracy"...Hehe. Very clever. I likeee. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Just to be Absolutely Clear,
the Independent has never cheered on Bush's bullshit. Even among British newspapers, the Independent was always stridently left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Not as biased as most.
Edited on Fri Feb-10-06 10:49 PM by LynnTheDem
Scott Ritter - who was at the heart of the inspections process for seven years - argued that the Iraqi regime had cooperated with his team in dismantling "90-95%" of its WMD by December 1998, leaving the country "fundamentally disarmed". Subsequent rearmament would have been impossible, Ritter insisted, and any retained chemical or biological material would long since have become "harmless sludge". But evidence of the success of the 1991-98 inspections - which fundamentally undermined government claims that war was required to enforce disarmament - was given the scantest coverage, even in the liberal press.

Of 12,447 Guardian and Observer articles mentioning Iraq in 2003 on the Guardian Unlimited website, Scott Ritter was mentioned in only 17, mostly in passing.

The Independent mentioned Ritter only eight times in 5,648 articles on Iraq in 2003.
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/media/2004/1215balance.htm

The Independent and the Guardian, quite simply, are part of the establishment reporting on the establishment. ... What was unusual was, not the extent to which the Guardian, Independent and others acted as propaganda organs for power, but the extent to which events outside their control conspired to expose this role.

These papers may have been "the most sceptical", but they in fact expressed +minimal+ scepticism about government claims ahead of the war, as we have documented on numerous occasions.

http://www.medialens.org/alerts/04/040728_Bias_Balanced_Journalism.HTM

They had their share of pro-war and unmentioned/incorrect facts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. me too! I'm seeing dead relatives and stuff...
*flthdt*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC