In a departure from the usual nutbar-winger desperate attempts to justify the attack on Iraq because Saddam's cousin's brother's maid's half-sister's friend's gardener may have talked to someone "affiliated" with al Qaida, or that the reason we haven't found any doubleyouemdee in Iraq is because just before the coalition of the shilling attacked Saddam moved them all to Syria (or Iran, or Syria and Iran, or Paris), please, before they take it down from their site, get over to the Weakly Standard and read about their latest effort.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/006/692uuaxc.aspAllow me to sum it up for you:
The reason we haven't found those evasive WMD or proof of pre-attack WMD is because we haven't scrutinized all those super-colossal untapped reservoirs and masses of data lifted while liberating all those Iraqis with big enough computers. If we'd just stop following those damn well-accepted approaches used by law-enforcement and used the Photoshop of forensics instead of the Microsoft Paint then by God we'd find that proof right in front of us. Stand well back and let me exploit those media mountains with my big cluster supercomputer because if we want to find WMD it just boils down to how interested we are in squaring the circle. He had WMD I swear.I have made it a part of my weekly reading to take a brief but entertaining trip over to this bastion of bromidic boobs as their deadpan attempts to intellectualize their mendacious lies and manipulations and desperately cling to the same in the face of proof to the contrary is always good for a laugh. They never let you down.