|
because it opens the discussion to the one point that I am most interested in making. The initiatives mentioned in the OP were a way to get the REAL discussion started (although admittedly there does not seem to be much interest):)
In order to establish context I want to explain my theory of the how's and why's regarding the actions of the current administration. I do not believe they are incompetent. I do not believe they hate government. I believe they are extremely competent and love government. They are competent in executing their agenda, and their agenda is a takeover of every facet of government in order to establish a fascist state. Remember that fascists love government because that is the instrument by which they wrest control of the population, the media as well as the treasury. I think you might agree that those objectives have been largely accomplished.
How did they meet their objectives? They did it by creating outrage from day one, and never looking back. Consider for a moment all the incidents of malfeasance that have occurred in the past five years. It is hard to imagine that this was a result of sloppiness or an accident. No, they manufactured outrage in such volume that we, the people, simply are not able to even catalog their crimes. The pattern is as follows: HUGE crime - liberal outrage - series of smaller crimes - liberal outrage directed at the smaller crimes while the huge crime is largely left behind - HUGE crime - lather rinse repeat.
To summarize, they plotted their agenda, and they executed it to perfection. To use an analogy, it was as though we are playing a football game, they are on offense, they put 22 men on the field to our legal 11 men. They flood the end zone and score. The referees are bought and paid for and they call a touchdown. We are outraged and we complain. While we complain they kick an on-sides kick with their 22 men and start the cycle all over again.
DO you think that when they were plotting their takeover they said to themselves. "Stealing elections is really too much, we shouldn't go that far", "holding secret meetings with the VP is too much, we shouldn't go that far", perpetrating a terror attack on America is too much, we shouldn't do that", etc. etc. etc.
What I am proposing is that we do the same. Except we do it legally. We need to implement our visions and ideals in a bare-knuckle fashion. Let them endure the outrage and worry about how to deal with it. We can even give them tips on how. After all, we are practiced enough.
Does this make sense?
|