|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Robb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 01:12 PM Original message |
Is this union-busting? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GrpCaptMandrake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 01:14 PM Original message |
Yep, that's union-busting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
f-bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
1. Sure was union busting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
2. Just one of many dirty tricks they use. Thank Dog all those yuppie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 06:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. As I recall |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 07:11 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Only Idiots believe RW talking points like that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 07:57 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. That's what happened |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 08:14 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. They sure did, bought it right down the line, cause we were all gonna |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 09:22 PM Response to Reply #22 |
35. We?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-09-06 10:14 AM Response to Reply #35 |
47. I meant "we" in the collective sense, as in "we amerikans". n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 08:20 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. MILLIONS of WORKERS would jump at the chance to join a union. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 09:27 PM Response to Reply #23 |
38. And millions wouldn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-09-06 02:28 PM Response to Reply #38 |
49. You know, as someone who's risking my future fighting for a union |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-09-06 03:20 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Just ignore reality??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-09-06 04:12 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. Sorry then. I must have misunderstood your post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-09-06 10:18 AM Response to Reply #23 |
48. I wish this were true, unfortunately I found the opposite. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Tires (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 08:31 PM Response to Reply #11 |
27. i met this high-schooler a couple of months ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 09:13 PM Response to Reply #27 |
34. 80's redux |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asthmaticeog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
3. Yes, it's union busting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 02:33 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. So managers aren't part of the union? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asthmaticeog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 03:48 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Nope. Management is excluded from workers' unions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 06:18 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Thanks. Proving |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asthmaticeog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 08:23 PM Response to Reply #10 |
25. Well, y'know, you can take the dingbat out of the Lounge... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 09:54 PM Response to Reply #6 |
40. These folks are not management. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
4. Yes, and this has been the game for a while. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lpbk2713 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
5. The LU might have screwed up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Twist_U_Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
7. yeppers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
8. Why did the union lose otherwise? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
12. Sounds Legitimate To Me. And If It Was Only A Handful, And The Vote Was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 06:50 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Well, yes and no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 06:58 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. If They Lost By Five Votes, Than Even If All Five Of Them Were Pro-Union |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
two gun sid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 10:06 PM Response to Reply #13 |
41. Did These "supervisors" pay union dues? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 07:12 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. It is Union Busting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 07:57 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. As I said, From what I've read so far it seems just fine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 08:22 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. The NLRB ruling is all the info one needs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 08:28 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Since You Are Working Straight Off Of Assumption Without Anything Factual |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 08:36 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Are we really having this discussion on DU in 06? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 08:46 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Not Sure Which Poster Leans Rightward, But Regardless, Are You Going To |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 08:52 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. No.Not If you refuse to accept anything posted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 08:57 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Nothing Has Been Posted In Response To My 3 Questions. I Implore You To |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 09:07 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Why not address the OP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 09:23 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. All That Effort And Yet No Further Substance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 09:25 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. I'm crushed! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 10:23 PM Response to Reply #36 |
44. Which side are you on? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 10:32 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. With All Due Respect Ben (And You Do Have My Respect), I Am On The Side Of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 11:57 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. Yeah, we shall have to disagree about this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
louis c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 07:06 PM Response to Original message |
15. Here's my take on it.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 07:39 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. As a business manager you must know unions do not designate anyone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
louis c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 08:07 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. This would be spelled out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ksec (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
28. Yes it was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
39. Not only was it union busting, but those new "supervisors" just lost their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cmd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
42. Were those newly named "supervisors" salaried or hourly workers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-08-06 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
43. Yes, absolutely this is unionbusting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-09-06 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
50. If management makes a move to destroy a union, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bperci108 (969 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-11-06 01:10 AM Response to Original message |
53. My two cents... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 12:10 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC