Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:33 PM
Original message
US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights
Edited on Tue Jan-16-07 01:56 PM by reprehensor
US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights
By Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton

PDF, 300k
http://projectcensored.org/newsflash/ElectromegnaticWeapons.pdf

Research completed December, 2006

This research explores the current capabilities of the US military to use electromagnetic (EMF) devices to harass, intimidate, and kill individuals and the continuing possibilities of violations of human rights by the testing and deployment of these weapons. To establish historical precedent in the US for such acts, we document long-term human rights and freedom of thought violations by US military/intelligence organizations. Additionally, we explore contemporary evidence of on-going government research in EMF weapons technologies and examine the potentialities of continuing human rights abuses.

In the 1950s and 60s the CIA began work to find means for influencing human cognition, emotion and behavior. Through the use of the psychological understanding of the human being as a social animal and the ability to manipulate a subject’s environment through isolation, drugs and hypnosis, US funded scientists have long searched for better means of controlling human behavior. This research has included the use of wireless directed electromagnetic energy under the heading of “Information Warfare” and “Non Lethal Weapons.” New technological capabilities have been developed in black budget projects over the last few decades— including the ability to influence human emotion, disrupt thought, and present excruciating pain through the manipulation of magnetic fields. The US military and intelligence agencies have at their disposal frightful new weapons, weapons that have likely already been covertly used and/or tested on humans, both here and abroad, and which could be directed against the public in the event of mass protests or civil disturbance.

Human Rights belong to people collectively. To believe in rights for some and not others is a denial of the humanness of people worldwide. Yet, denial is exactly what Congress and George W. Bush did with the signing of the Military Commission Act of 2006. The new official US policy is that torture and suspension of due process are acceptable for anyone the president deems to be a terrorist or supporter. This act is the overt denial of the inalienable rights of human beings propagated in our Declaration of Independence and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. More so, US actions declared to the world that the US suspends human rights for those it believes are evil.

The precious words, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness,” did not declare that only some men (and women) possess unalienable rights. Our independence was founded on the understanding that all men and women are recognized by this nation as having innate rights derived by their humanity...


The above quotation is an important new report from Project Censored. It comes at a time when a couple of things are breaking into the mainstream media about mind control and allegations of the use of high-tech weaponry on unwitting American citizens.

This first report is from Canada, and details the experience of one woman who was experimented on for the MK-ULTRA program in the 1950s;

Victim owed compensation in CIA case, judge told
Montreal woman who was experimented on should receive reparations, lawyer says

DENE MOORE
Canadian Press (Toronto "Globe and Mail" internet edition)
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20070111.BRAINWASH11/TPStory/National

January 11, 2007

"...Now it's time for the federal government to compensate those victims, lawyer Alan Stein argued.

Mr. Stein is seeking court approval for a class-action lawsuit on behalf of his client, Janine Huard, one of the hundreds of patients of Ewen Cameron to be subjected to the Cold War-era experiments.

"She never knew that she was being subjected to these experiments or that she was being used by Dr. Cameron and his staff as a guinea pig," Mr. Stein told the court.

Dr. Cameron pioneered "psychic driving," by which he believed he could erase the memories of patients and rebuild their psyches without psychiatric defect.

The idea intrigued the CIA, which recruited Dr. Cameron to experiment with mind-control techniques beginning in 1950. The experiments carried out at the Allan Memorial Institute at McGill University were jointly funded by the CIA and the Canadian government.

They were part of a larger CIA program called MK-ULTRA, which also saw LSD administered to U.S. prison inmates and patrons of brothels without their knowledge, according to testimony before a 1977 U.S. Senate committee..."


It seems that you can only have so many of these "secret" programs cooking before the truth boils over into the public domain. In the case of MK-ULTRA, the truth has been trickling out for years, but with Huard's case making the rounds of high-circulation news sources like the Globe and Mail, the truth about MK-ULTRA may be about to make a quantum leap forward, with or without the consent of the people who authorized the secret program in the first place.

This past Sunday saw the publication of a 7,000 word essay in the Washington Post Magazine called Mind Games. No mere scribble on a blog, this is an interesting essay, with surprising details, and alarming possibilites that could result from the use of this technology;

Mind Games
New on the Internet: a community of people who believe the government is beaming voices into their minds. They may be crazy, but the Pentagon has pursued a weapon that can do just that.

By Sharon Weinberger
Sunday, January 14, 2007; W22

"...Concerns about microwaves and mind control date to the 1960s, when the U.S. government discovered that its embassy in Moscow was being bombarded by low-level electromagnetic radiation. In 1965, according to declassified Defense Department documents, the Pentagon, at the behest of the White House, launched Project Pandora, top-secret research to explore the behavioral and biological effects of low-level microwaves. For approximately four years, the Pentagon conducted secret research: zapping monkeys; exposing unwitting sailors to microwave radiation; and conducting a host of other unusual experiments (a sub-project of Project Pandora was titled Project Bizarre). The results were mixed, and the program was plagued by disagreements and scientific squabbles. The "Moscow signal," as it was called, was eventually attributed to eavesdropping, not mind control, and Pandora ended in 1970. And with it, the military's research into so-called non-thermal microwave effects seemed to die out, at least in the unclassified realm.

But there are hints of ongoing research: An academic paper written for the Air Force in the mid-1990s mentions the idea of a weapon that would use sound waves to send words into a person's head. "The signal can be a 'message from God' that can warn the enemy of impending doom, or encourage the enemy to surrender," the author concluded.

In 2002, the Air Force Research Laboratory patented precisely such a technology: using microwaves to send words into someone's head. That work is frequently cited on mind-control Web sites. Rich Garcia, a spokesman for the research laboratory's directed energy directorate, declined to discuss that patent or current or related research in the field, citing the lab's policy not to comment on its microwave work.

In response to a Freedom of Information Act request filed for this article, the Air Force released unclassified documents surrounding that 2002 patent -- records that note that the patent was based on human experimentation in October 1994 at the Air Force lab, where scientists were able to transmit phrases into the heads of human subjects, albeit with marginal intelligibility. Research appeared to continue at least through 2002. Where this work has gone since is unclear -- the research laboratory, citing classification, refused to discuss it or release other materials..."


Now, I find all this alarming enough. I really do. But don't worry, there's more!

Check out this post over at the Federation of American Scientists Project on Government Secrecy blog;

U.S. Navy research on "mind control techniques" cannot be performed on human subjects without the authorization of the Under Secretary of the Navy, according to a new Navy Instruction (pdf).

"The Under Secretary of the Navy (UNSECNAV) is the Approval Authority for research involving ... severe or unusual intrusions, either physical or psychological, on human subjects (such as consciousness-altering drugs or mind-control techniques)."


The nature and scope of any such Navy research could not be immediately discovered.

See "Human Research Protection Program," Secretary of the Navy Instruction 3900.39D, November 6, 2006 .

Posted by Steven Aftergood on December 1, 2006 10:44 AM


There you go, some facts with some chilling possibilities. I mean, you got a right to know where your tax dollars are going... right?


http://shop.truemajority.org/product/show/5098
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. those weapons will be tested in Iraq, but they will be
used on us if we dare stand up to the Junta.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Nonlethal weapons touted for use on citizens
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14806772/

Nonlethal weapons touted for use on citizens
Air Force secretary says they should be used for domestic crowd control

AP - Sept 12, 2006

WASHINGTON - Nonlethal weapons such as high-power microwave devices should be used on American citizens in crowd-control situations before they are used on the battlefield, the Air Force secretary said Tuesday.

Domestic use would make it easier to avoid questions in the international community over any possible safety concerns, said Secretary Michael Wynne.

“If we’re not willing to use it here against our fellow citizens, then we should not be willing to use it in a wartime situation,” said Wynne. “(Because) if I hit somebody with a nonlethal weapon and they claim that it injured them in a way that was not intended, I think that I would be vilified in the world press.”

The Air Force has funded research into nonlethal weapons, but he said the service isn’t likely to spend more money on development until injury issues are reviewed by medical experts and resolved...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. knr 5#! n/t
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Great post
And it might explain how * communicates with God we all know the man just isn't right in the head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. self-delete
Edited on Wed Jan-17-07 11:21 AM by reprehensor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. What cak this is.
The people who wrote that ProjectCensored article obviously don't know what the hell they're talking about. For starters, it's basically impossible to remotely influence a person's brain via electromagnetism. A strong enough EM field can affect mood, but there's no forseeable way of controlling how it's affected, and you'd need an EM field of fairly high power. More to the point, there's so much individual variance in terms of brain chemistry and response as to make any weaponized version virtually useless. What would make one person depressed might make another angry and aggressive.

The rest of the bits are just taken completely out of context to support the conclusion. Nearly every bit of this is absolute conjecture, with no evidence for it other than that somebody, somewhere might once have mentioned the idea, or that the DoD looked into it around the same time they were trying to build nuclear-fueled airplanes and jeeps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Perhaps if you actually looked at the article
you would find that each one of the 48 pages is fully documented and credited. Just because you don't want to believe something doesn't make it any less real.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. You have a funny definition of "fully documented and credited."
Because this stuff is anything but. It mixes in just enough truth to try and make the rest of it go down easier. The rest of it is a mixture of completely unproven claims, sinister implication, and paranoia. It cites fringe groups and kooks as supposed evidence that such things are taken seriously by anyone that matters, and it blithely assumes that most of the things that may have once been theorized are even remotely possible. Another thing that we did during the Cold War was use psychics to try and locate Soviet submarines. Does that mean that psychics are real? Of course not, any more than magical radio mind control, or the nuclear powered airplanes that they wanted to build. Out of curiousity, if you think that this stuff exists, why isn't it being used, eh? Last time I noticed, public support for the war was at an all time low. If the things that you speculate are true, then how do you explain the fact that the public hasn't been turned into a quivering mass of jelly?

I once heard a researched enunciate an excellent principle with regard to conspiracy theories, having to do with equivalence. His example was the mass-murders during World War II. In that, you have a sense of equivalency: greatest crime, greatest criminals. But where you don't have that sense, you get conspiracy theories. So people start thinking that the World Trade Center couldn't have been brought down by nineteen guys who hijacked airliners, because that doesn't seem like a satisfying answer. They don't want to believe something so big could be done by someone so small.

Or in this case, that the complacency of the average American has to be the result of mind control rather than the simpler truth: that we've bred a culture that's intellectually lazy in pretty much every way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Please don't take this the wrong way but
you are only speculating yourself. You haven't given anything to support any of your statements other than the usual sort of CS debunk gobbledygook.

And as for 9-11 the reason that most believe the trade center wasn't brought down by al qaeda's brandishing boxcutters is that the official story and the facts simply don't match up. Has nothing to do with a wishful belief that something so big could be done by someone so small.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. You are wrong.
Take a few days to go through this and then come back and admit how wrong you are.


http://www.mindjustice.org/book_frameset.htm


http://www.raven1.net/uncom.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Are you under the misapprehension that any of that is true?
It's all a lot of completely unsupported claims, hearsay, rumors, and bunk, whipped up and presented like it's fact. It's tin-foil hattery at its most ridiculous. I dare you to find one reputable scientist who would agree that the things speculated at in those texts are implementable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. If you are so sure,
please educate us with some actual facts and figures yourself. That would be more persuasive instead of criticizing the article and not backing up your strong statements with anything at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. You want facts and figures that proves mind control isn't real?
Is that like the chart that proves bigfoot's airplane is causing chemtrails?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. The authors of this article
back it up totally with their sources. Censored is a reputable operation. If you're disputing what they are saying, then cite something to prove them wrong. That's all I'm saying. Just your word calling it bunko isn't going to do it.

Message to self: I gotta stop allowing these CT debunkers or disinfo agents or whatever they are to drive me crazy. Must remember there is an ignore button.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Your attempts to distract by framing the context have failed. You are now beyond wrong .
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Dontcha just love pretend science?...
:eyes:

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. "Remote Behavioral Influence Technology Evidence" by John J. McMurtrey MS
Edited on Tue Jan-16-07 08:08 PM by bobthedrummer
copyright 2003-used within fair use

This is well researched evidence, McMurtrey's work has been cited in court cases and the second paragraph eliminates many of your assumptions.

http://www.v72.org/mind_control_remote.htm

edited for spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. McMurtrey is an amazing character
A look into his work will give one a foothold on realpolitik.

I believe he was also a professional football player.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. Cheryl Welsh is a UN recognized non-lethal weapons expert and an activist
for human rights and against the types of systems that target the human central nervous system-no matter what one calls them.

http://mindjustice.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. Some additional resources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. Kicked...
and definitely recommended!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC