Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Hugo Chavez really one of the worlds most dangerous people?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
EnviroBat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 01:41 PM
Original message
Is Hugo Chavez really one of the worlds most dangerous people?
Cause FOX told me so a little while ago, and I believe them... :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Any nation with nukes has to be a little ahead, and the more nukes, the more dangerous.
You do the math.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. not to add their is only one nation who already has used nukes and has a sociopath as a leader
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. There has to be a boogey man.....
Something has to be there to get the freepers all riled up about. Communisum, Saddam, Arab Terrorists, Hugo Chavez, Castro......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't know, there are a lot of people here in the U.S. benefitting from
Edited on Wed Jan-10-07 01:46 PM by AndyA
inexpensive heating oil due to Chavez.

That's more than George Bush has done for them. In fact, a lot more. Bush didn't even try to rein in the oil companies when they were gouging us at the pumps.

Bush might consider Chavez dangerous, but I'm sure those paying smaller heating bills don't feel that way.

When you shut someone out, they might seem more dangerous, because there is no line of communication. I don't like everything Chavez has done, but Bush isn't in a position to criticize him, either. A lot of the world feels George Bush is one of the world's most dangerous people, and there's pretty good reason for them to feel that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. How many is "a lot"? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. 50 million barrels.
Edited on Wed Jan-10-07 02:02 PM by AndyA
According to Time Magazine:

Philadelphia, Boston, the Bronx and cities in Maine, Vermont and Rhode Island have received a total of 45 million gallons of the subsidized Citgo fuel, and other cities are slated for another 5 million soon. That’s a small percentage of the heating oil Venezuela exports to the U.S. each year, but Citgo says it has set aside about 10% of its refined petroleum products for the program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. It's interesting to me that West Texas Intermediate (crude oil) is still priced above OPEC ....
... and the Oiligarchs point the finger at Chavez while extolling the 'virtues' of the Saudi's for increasing production.

Hello? :wtf:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. There is a lot about oil pricing right now that doesn't make sense.
I suspect some of the answers are contained in the super secret Bush Energy Policy that was done behind closed doors. The only ones benefiting are the big oil conglomerations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. He's an authoritarian, but not the most dangerous person in the world...
Edited on Wed Jan-10-07 01:47 PM by originalpckelly
I'd tell you that a brain dead idiot with the nuclear football.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Who Exactly is in Danger?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. No - the neo cons in the White House are
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. LOL!! El Mono Bush aka Mr Danger the Donkey is the world's most dangerous person...
and that's a documented fact.

I did a search at the NYTs on Allende. Interesting to view the headlines from those years at the NYTs. See the similarities? It's the same old US dirty tricks game. Demonize, try to discredit, and pour millions into trying to destabilize Venezuela's economy. The MSM has ALWAYS been the propaganda shill for the US government.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why, who has he invaded?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. To corporations in Venezuela. He's a danger to their profits.
And, the idea that the people should benefit from their own resources might spread to other countries in the region.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Heaven forbid that corporations have profits.
And I wasn't aware that telecommunication systems were a natural resource.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. My heart bleeds for Verizon.
Maybe the CEO will have to deploy his Golden Parachute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. You think easements over private and public lands should be free to privateers?
Edited on Wed Jan-10-07 02:04 PM by TahitiNut
You think a municipal infrastructure should be privately-owned? You think the broadcast spectrum ISN'T a "natural resource"???

:wow: :wow: :wow: :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Thanks Nut When I Read That I Went WTF?
Gobsmacked. Yes that is the word I was looking for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. (((Binka))) ... Yep. "Gobsmacked" is certainly the word.
Edited on Wed Jan-10-07 03:02 PM by TahitiNut
The privateering (piracy) of public infrastructure and resources is totally appalling to me.

That's why I like what Ashland, Oregon has done - converted their entire cable/wire physical infrastructure to municipal ownership, upgraded to fiber-to-the-curb and opened it up to ALL service providers to compete in offering services over that infrastructure. No more having a single choice for telecommunications access and being dependent on some indolent customer service 'rep' in another state or another country.

That's also part of why I like Kucinich and how he handled municipal power in Cleveland

The Telecomm Act of 1996 is an absolute abomination. Chavez has the right idea. Nationalize the energy and telecomm infrastructure. Fuck the pirates!

PS: I hope your son's doing good! :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Ah Nut They Are Sending Ben Back In March
I guess this was not enough for them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. !
:cry:

((Binka)) :hug:
((Ben)) :hug: :patriot:

(Words fail me.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
irislake Donating Member (967 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. But what profits?
I'm all for Chavez. What a refreshing change from Cheney/Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
15. Dangerous? Nah. Just a third-world, America-hating, attention craving wannabe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
36. Did I miss the sarcasm tag?
WHAT DO YOU AMIS CARE about Venezuela? What do you REALLY know about anything that happens beyond a thousand mile radius from where you live?
How many, who have so much to say, can READ and UNDERSTAND SPANISH? :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
18. I don't like the idea of stepping on the press, but...
...absolute legal freedom of the press or close to it seems to be particular to this country. Other free countries like Canada and Britian have some level of censorship. So I am not prepared to label Chavez a Castro-esque dictator on that score. Besides, in this country, the press is heavily censored by its corporate ownership, something I will guess is not true for Venezuela. As far as nationalizing industry, so what? Chavez was reelected fair-and-square which is more than Dubya can honestly claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
19. Of course not! Chavez is a hero. And he knows sulfur when he smells it.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
22. Absolutely not. And here's a tip for you ... if Fox says it, you can bet your bottom dollar
that the truth is 180 degrees away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
23. Yes, and Ted Kennedy is an enemy of America.
Fox told me that today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RethugAssKicker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
24. Chavez is a great man !.... Viva Chavez


Most Americans are buying the bullshit about Chavez. They don't know shit !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
25. I must post this:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RethugAssKicker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. Thanks..first time reading it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
26. He like all "enemies of the state" are only dangerous
to capitalists....He just may show that a form of socialism could work and that can't be allowed...as usual...but everyone knows that as the oil becomes harder to get, capitalism will fall and we'll have to go to a form of socialism to survive...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
27. Nope
Just another bonapartist strongman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
28. Yes he's EXTREMELY dangerous.
using a democracy to find out what the majority of his people actually want and then doing it? OMG!!!

using the resources of the country to enrich the majority of the people instead of just the select top elite? OMG!!

This man must be stopped before the serfs in the US get any bright ideas.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JacksonWest Donating Member (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
34. he has strange bedfellows(Cuba, Iran), but he's not dangerous.
He's a jackass, but a populist jackass. He's not a horrible person, I just don't understand the hero worship. He sort of reminds me of Ed Schultz, only he's probably got a better radio show.

It is amazing watching the denigration of Chavez by the media and the assorted nut jobs on the right. He worthy of some criticism, but he's hardly dangerous. If he didn't have oil, we wouldn't care. But that's understood. Oh well. He'' be a non issue if and when we get a Dem in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judaspriestess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
35. I just asked a tourist from Venezuela visiting Las Vegas a
similar question the other night, he said, Chavez is no good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC