Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BUSH-ABRAMOFF PHOTO SHOWS THE PRESIDENT TO BE A LIAR

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:02 PM
Original message
BUSH-ABRAMOFF PHOTO SHOWS THE PRESIDENT TO BE A LIAR
Edited on Mon Jan-08-07 10:30 PM by Dems Will Win


Bush said he never met Abramoff. This photo is from a December 2003 affair at the WH.


As we saw as recently as last Friday, the Bush Administration has gone to great lengths to prevent any access to information documenting a relationship with Jack Abramoff. But that relationship exists. CREW was provided a photo of President Bush and Jack Abramoff taken at a campaign fundraiser in December 2003. The White House did not want anyone to see this photo. So, that begs the question: What else are they hiding?

http://blog.citizensforethics.org/node/478


WASHINGTON - A liberal watchdog group published on its Web site Monday a picture of President Bush and imprisoned lobbyist Jack Abramoff, the kind of photo the White House has refused to release.

The picture was taken at a campaign fundraiser in December 2003, according to the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. It was taken by a private photo contractor who posted it on a Web site, but then was removed before it made it into distribution, said Melanie Sloan, CREW's director.

A previous photo of Bush and the disgraced lobbyist surfaced last year, but Abramoff was in the background, slightly blurry.

"This is the one they didn't want you to see," Sloan said.

Kim Eisler, Washingtonian magazine writer and a friend of Abramoff's, confirmed the photo's authenticity for The Associated Press. He said he had seen the picture at Abramoff's house.

The White House did not immediately return a call seeking comment.

Abramoff helped raise more than $100,000 for Bush's 2004 re-election campaign. He is serving nearly six years in prison for a fraudulent Florida casino deal and is cooperating with the FBI in a bribery investigation involving members of Congress and the Bush administration.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16532577/


Please RECOMMEND.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dog Bites Man
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. What's new?
The question is how do we force the media to show theAmerican people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I have another photo of Abramoff in the background for a ceremony
with Bush shaking hands with a Kickapoo Indian Tribal chairman. The chairman submitted the photo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. I've seen that one.
I think I also have a copy of it. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Jack was such a busy boy
Senate panel probes claims pair bilked tribes of millions - ethnic slurs
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=875095

Casino Lobbyist Won't Answer Questions
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=873883

Choctaws mum on lobbyist ties
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=882412

Tribe says it will sue lobbyists over huge fees
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=882522

Scanlon ‘is hiding out’Federal marshals cannot find former aide to DeLay
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=875208

Pair Under Inquiry May Face Tribal Action
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=889455

Policy Analyst Is Said to Have Rejected Plea Deal - Larry Franklin
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=887170

DeLay says he won't step down
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=891237

Ethics Rebuke to DeLay Prompts Democratic Calls for Ouster
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=889937

Abramoff Allies Keeping Distance Scrutiny for Dealings With Indian Tribes
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=969291

Actions by Delay Cited in Lawsuit -NYT
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=1295700

Probe of lobbyist expands to charity Abramoff
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=1322522

Tom DeLay's Problems Prompt Expanded Coverage by USPoliticstoday.com
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=1321753

Inquiries of Top Lobbyist Shine Unwelcome Light in Congress -NYT
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=1385059&mesg_id=1385059

Inquiries of Top Lobbyist Shine Unwelcome Light in Congress -NYT
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=1385059

'Delay Knew Everything. He Knew All the Details.'
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=1383901

Lobbyist is target of calls for inquiry into millions in fees - Abramoff
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=1396990

Look Who's Talking - Jack Abramoff
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=1434519


Boulis Investigation Dredges Up Big Names - Abramoff
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=1839596

House ethics panel silent on scandals
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=1967623
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:13 PM
Original message
kewl list!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. But he didn't "meet" him. Depends on what your definition of "met" is.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R!
Republican Lobbyist Jack Abramoff was much thinner then. He must have been fed a lot of pork by the repukes.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #6
29. Don't forget....
he owned a trough. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
connecticut yankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
30. Kosher pork?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
48. As an Orthodox Jew, Jackie boy isn't supposed to eat pork.
Remember? Guess he conveniently forgot about that too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onecent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. K & R. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EllenZ Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. Have 2 problems with this
1)As many people each day pose with the prez, I can see him not remembering one out of thousands.

2)Look close at the shadows on the faces in the picture, looks different to me on each face, someone needs to hone their Photoshop skills.

If you want to decry the prez, use something he can not deny, like the WMDs that we have yet to find in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. This is posted on MSNBC and I sure they check
for a photoshop.

:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EllenZ Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Tell that to
NBC. Remember all those documents Tom showed that turned out to be fake and cost him his job? MSNBC are the same people who let that get by them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Yeah, that was CBS and Dan Rather...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Tom Who? What documents would those be?
I don't have the faintest idea what the hell you're talking about. Honestly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. I just love the marginally informed.
Y'all are SO entertaining. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
43. if you're talking
about Dan Rather and the Bush national guard documents, they were never shown to be fake.

The question was whether they were the ORIGINAL documents. The secretary who typed them up said the content was exactly what she typed.

welcome to DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. You don't forget people who raise over $100,000 for you
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/05/how-much/

President Bush is donating $6,000 in campaign contributions linked to Abramoff to charity. He is donating money raised from Abramoff, his wife and a Native-American tribe he represented. But that’s a small fraction of the amount of money raised for Bush by Abramoff, which is at least $120,000 and potentially much more. From the 7/21/03 New York Times:

As President Bush’s re-election campaign races to accumulate the largest treasury in history, a similarly fierce contest has begun among his best-connected supporters. Raising $100,000 for the president is a bit passe in this competition; now loyalists must bring in $200,000 or more to be considered top-tier, and they had better come with sharp elbows and plenty of prosperous friends.

“Everyone in town is trying to be a Pioneer or Ranger,” said Jack Abramoff, a top Republican lobbyist here, using the campaign’s terms for the most elite levels of money collectors. “But the only way to do it is to have contacts outside of D.C., which fortunately I do. So far I’ve raised about $120,000, and I haven’t even really started making calls.”

The exact amount raised for Bush by Abramoff remains unknown. A spokesperson for the Bush/Cheney campaign, Tracey Schmitt, said “At this point, there is nothing to indicate that contributions from those individual donors represents anything other than enthusiastic support for the re-election campaign.” If that’s the case, President Bush shouldn’t have any problem disclosing the total.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. EllenZ, you'll get over it after a few more posts
if you make it that far :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. oh EllenZ
Jack is definetly unforgetable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. We've done the WMD's thing, the public didn't care.
And you can bet your ass whether this was PS'ed or not Bush remembers Abramoff. (BTW if this is a photoshop it's good, I took it down to the pixels and couldn't see any discrepancies) If he wasn't lying about it then why did they just secure the White House visitors log a few days ago? The Abramhoff thing is huge, if we can ever break through the veneer many people will go down, including Bush and Cheney.

Oh and Welcome to DU :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
exlrrp Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
33. Theyre not exactly embracing either
Edited on Tue Jan-09-07 08:30 AM by exlrrp
Even if this is real, its not very intimate. its one of those staged/10 second receiving line type photos that don't say very much at all.
What they should be doing is looking for pictures of Abramoff with Rove, Ralston, Safavian,Rudy, etc. Bush himself probably didn't spend much time at all with Abramoff, the crimes were all done through aides and posting picture of Bush aides with Abramoff will show more. And how about Abramoff/delay or Ney or other important republican figures?
Publish that golfing one of Abramoff and Delay in Scotland! Expand the focus a little here-- a receiving line picture of Bush and Abramoff isn't exactly a smoking gun any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. Why Tom Delay?
Tom's already got a cell awaiting him.
We're on to bigger and better things now.
And for your info...little boy king doesn't receive "just anyone" in a line.
He only receives the well-healed pre-screened contributors.
If he doesn't remember it is only because he was coked up or drunk when he shook their hand.
Personally I find it a little offensive that we have an executive in charge that cannot remember anything. Don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
35. Ahhh in denial I see
:popcorn:
Oh but you see...he does deny.
Not hard when he has an entire keyboard battalion ready at his command.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
41. What are you talking about?
Edited on Tue Jan-09-07 12:02 PM by PelosiFan
The shadows on their faces? They are exactly the same. As are the shadows of their heads behind them.

Decry the prez? LOL Yes, we should only decry the "prez" (and that's a mighty cute nickname for a democrat to give him, btw) about WMDs. Nothing else. That's the ticket. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
49. #1 was the official cop-out a few months back.
I think that particular talking point lasted about a week or less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. We've got a million of 'em...
Edited on Mon Jan-08-07 10:16 PM by Buzz Clik


Bush and Abramoff at Brokeback Mountain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. There's no arguing with that pic! Their affair was long and enduring,
I am sure of that. I never doubted it--but this pic is good, to demonstrate it plainly for wingnuts who can't read.

Hey, doesn't Abramoff still have some pending criminal cases against him? Funny how he never seems to actually have a TRIAL--I guess that would be too embarrassing for his many, many, many republican accomplices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. they will say he was just one guy paying $50,000 out of hundreds during a $10,000 a plate dinner,..
Edited on Mon Jan-08-07 10:21 PM by sam sarrha
for a photo with the president.. and * was really drunk and didng remember him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. Wiat! Karl Rove will claim that the drapes were a slightly different shade
Edited on Mon Jan-08-07 10:26 PM by TOJ
of blue in 12/2003, so this photo is obviously FAKE!

No, wait actually, that means that Smirk never met Abramoff!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
22. Real Estate For Sale


This one IS Photoshopped but gets to the essence of the matter...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. kick+
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
23. It's about effing time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calzone Donating Member (242 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
25. I have to agree with Ellen...here's more pics
Edited on Mon Jan-08-07 11:44 PM by calzone
Even if they find more pics, what seems obvious to the rest of us, won't nail Bush. He can keep claiming he's met thousands and can't remember every person he's posed with. Sure it seems ludicrous that someone who donated hundreds of 1000's would be obscure to Mr. beautiful mind, but pictures won't do it IMHO, what's needed is records, like the W.H. visitation records from the secret service, and campaign donation records. A paper trail, not photos. If Bush can pull off saying he acted in good faith with the best info he had when WMD's and B.S. terrorist activity in Saddam's Iraq is flung at him, if he can get away with saying Abu Ghraib was a few bad apples in an isolated incident, if he can call Napalm a non-incendiary and white phosphorous a non-chemical wep and say that he had the authority to declassify (Plame affair) reports that didn't originate in the White House, and come out like John Dupont Gotti, he can slide on all but the most damning of evidence. The standard for him is miles higher than the average taxpayer. Here's more pics tho', for whatever good it'll do....

"On May 9, 2001, Chief Raul Garza of the Kickapoo tribe of Texas met with President Bush, with Jack Abramoff and Grover Norquist in attendance. Abramoff was identified in the background of a photo taken at the meeting. Days before the meeting, the tribe paid $25,000 to Grover Norquist's Americans for Tax Reform at Abramoff's direction. According to the organization's communications director, John Kartch, the meeting was one of several gatherings with President Bush sponsored by ATR. On the same day, the chief of the Louisiana Coushattas also attended an ATR-sponsored gathering with President Bush. The Coushattas also gave $25,000 to ATR soon before the event.

The details of the Kickapoo meeting and a letter dated May 10, 2001 from ATR thanking the Kickapoos for their contribution were revealed to the New York Times in 2006 by former council elder Isidro Garza, who with Raul Garza (no relation), is under indictment in Texas for embezzling tribal money. According to Isidro Garza, Abramoff did not say the donation was required to meet the president; the White House denied any knowledge of the transaction."
Wiki
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0310-02.htm

Over the should shot....


He's circled in red...




"According to former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, Abramoff was paid $1.2 million to arrange a meeting between Mahathir and president George W. Bush, allegedly at the direction of the Heritage Foundation. Mahathir insisted that someone unknown to him had paid for the meeting."
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,185482,00.html


"Other photos have surfaced of Jack Abramoff and President Bush meeting at the White House and Oval Office on either December 22 or 23, 2002. The photos were found on a site that published many pictures of governmental events, ReflectionsOrders.com. The owner of the site removed the photos almost immediately when the presence of Abramoff and Bush together was discovered. Some internet users located the photos and preserved copies of some of them.<36> The owner of the site gave thousands of dollars to the Bush campaign and Republican National Committee, according to public FEC contribution records."
See photos here.....
http://www.thedoubles.com/gwbja.html


Possible photoshop :-)



Another iffy one....







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyedyeto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Ok, EllenZ
what about this?

Does * remember this or ?

Let us know when you have the answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EllenZ Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. You have to make a verifiable charge
Photos are altered so much these days that no one considers them evidence anymore.

And with the hundreds of people Bush meets everyday, I'm sure he does not remember them all. Especially someone who is an arranger and stays in the background. I have trouble remembering all my clients (client list currently about 2K people), never mind their aids and lawyers.

As one of the previous posters stated, there are a lot of serious charges provable against Bush, we need to work on them instead of something the public will not accept. Other types of proof, like the Secret Service logs, are something that can not be faked, which is why that they got classified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #31
39. I'm sure Chimpy wouldn't remember someone who raised over $100,000
and whose secretary became Karl Rove's secretary.



Here are the Abramoff-Rove-Ralston emails compiled in chronological order by another DU'er.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=364&topic_id=2799625

Here is the original Waxman/Davis report on Abramoff.

http://www.democrats.reform.house.gov/abramoff/index.asp

And you just keep on spinnin'.

Enjoy your stay here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calzone Donating Member (242 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. i don't think it's spin...
...just a different opinion. i actually agree with you too blackops, Bush definitely remembers Abramoff, i think they're buds & thick as thieves, but we're not the ones that have to be convinced,
there has to be a more concrete avenue to pursue, something that leaves no wiggle room or plausible deniability. OK, not plausible to us, but to a formal group of deliberators.
i don't think any one doubts the authenticity of the photos of Bush and Abramoff together, it's whether they were friendly associates that's the crux, and here, Bush can wiggle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #39
46. That "other DU'er was ME
Thanks for linky goodness!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #31
45. Subpoena the staff. Many had to see Abramoff come and go.
They can't all lie. It's time for real investigations.IMO

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16541877/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Uh, yeah, definately photoshoped on the third one.
Edited on Tue Jan-09-07 12:24 AM by progressoid
From a guy that does that stuff...a lot.

But most of the others are damning. And I'm sure the media will pick up on these any day now.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
32. I can't think of a time when Bush told the truth???
Maybe about wanting to be a dictator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lawrence Donating Member (42 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
34. wait a minute hold the phone
bush LIES about stuff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. Little Bit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
38. Oh what tangled webs we weave Mr. President nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
40. We do need the records on visitors!!
Do I believe that Bush lied about not knowing Abramoff? Absolutely.
Does this picture prove it? Absolutely not.

It has nothing to do with Photoshop, either.

This picture is only somewhat helpful in making the case that Bush lied. It is no smoking gun.

Presidents pose with all sort so people that they don't remember.

I will say that I like the picture being circulated, just as a reminder!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
42. It's all about appearances. In fairness to dimson, he admitted such
pictures existed but didn't want us to see them because of how it looked.
He didn't know Ken Lay, either. He also didn't know that the WND intell was cooked or that his war would cost so much. There's a lot of stuff he doesn't know and we can't pin it on him. He's sort of like the Innocent Bystander President:


Despite Justice's refusal to help him, Black convened a grand jury, which subpoenaed the Abramoff contract with the Superior Court on November 18, 2002. The next day the Bush Administration announced that Black would be replaced as US Attorney and demoted him to Assistant US Attorney, after twelve years on the job. His replacement was Guam's Assistant Attorney General, Leonardo Rapadas. "Fred was removed because he asked to indict Abramoff," says one of Black's colleagues at Justice. "I don't believe it was a coincidence."

...

Before Rapadas's confirmation, in May 2003, law-enforcement officials in Guam had supplied extensive information to Ashcroft and senior Justice officials indicating that he would have to recuse himself from the Gutierrez investigation because he was related to two people implicated in the scandal. Also in May, Guam's new Governor, Felix Camacho, a former Black ally, met with Abramoff in Washington. That same month, Justice dispatched Assistant US Attorney Russ Stoddard to Guam. Stoddard proceeded to bar Black from working on any public corruption cases and demanded that all new cases be approved through him, rather than the criminal division--a highly unorthodox procedure. Black's investigation into Abramoff's activities was forceably halted. Reportedly, the FBI and the DOJ Inspector General have begun looking into Black's demotion. Sources close to the IG investigation say its findings will be released soon. But the way Justice silenced Black and Meissner in part prompted Senators Chuck Schumer and Ken Salazar to call for the appointment of a special counsel to handle the Abramoff investigation. The circumstances of Black's removal raise several questions. Did the White House interfere to stop Black's investigation? Was Gonzales involved? Was Ashcroft?



http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0204-23.htm


"Reportedly, the FBI and the DOJ Inspector General have begun looking into Black's demotion. Sources close to the IG investigation say its findings will be released soon."

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
47. bush a liar...who didn't know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC