Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oh no they didn't!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 08:39 AM
Original message
Oh no they didn't!
CNN is reporting that because of a college football game today that some Congressional members plan to attend/watch, votes have been delayed...possibly till next week. Tell me this is wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Faux just reported the same thing.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why is it wrong?
Don't you like football?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Whether I like football or not isn't the point
It's whether this is the proper way to start a new Congress while our troops are dying in Iraq, and after Pelosi made a big deal about 5-day weeks and 100-hour -- oh hell, I hope you were being sarcastic, but I didn't see the sarcasm tag.....

And btw, I despise football...unless it's played with a soccer ball. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #11
26. If it's a soccer ball it's not football.
I despise soccer!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #26
34. Well, technically ...
both soccer and football have equal claim to the word "football". The word originated in Eupore as a way to differentiate between sports played on foot and sports played on horseback. Sorry, can't provide a reference for ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's wrong.......
.....I can imagine the look on my boss's face if I asked to take off because I wanna watch football.............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. My boss would approve, except that he thinks football is stupid.
But then, my boss approves everything I want to do.

Self-denial is not one of my virtues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. A Congress person's first duty is to get re elected
...not that that would be MY first duty if I was a Congress person! But if it's a major ball game (I don't follow college football so I have no idea what it is) they may feel obligated to their constituency. I don't like it but it's not like it's an ethics violation or anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 08:47 AM
Original message
An excellent reason for term limits. Serving in Congress is an honor NOT
a budding career opportunity. If so, these Representatives serve THEMSELVES first. That is just plain WRONG. :puke: Yes, IMO, there's a great deal wrong with this decision. :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. Why would they have to wait until next week?
Ok, delay a day, but a whole week? :wtf: No need for that!

So, part of the first 100 hours will be spent at the stadium or in front of the TV instead of doing their work? That is unacceptable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. Damn the Elite Mentality: Meet the New Boss, same as the Old Boss. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
8. The house is actually re-convening late this afternoon, the senate
in late morning.
Members are excused until tomorrow, when real legislating starts again. This particular concession was granted because of the game, and the involvement in it, as well as the final chores that members had to attend to since they will be spending more time in DC.

CNN, et al, are doing their best to attempt to make the dems look bad, but one must remember that the previous practice was to attend the swearing in pageant and then adjourn until after the sotu speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. oh lordie
not to change the subject but when is the sotu speech? I need to remember to take my cat in for a flea dip that evening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #9
28. Typically, it has been delivered on the last tuesday in january
I have heard the date stipulated, but, after a search at google, whitehouse.gov, cspan, and a couple other sites, I don't have an answer.

I have heard that it is to be on the twenty third, but the schedule that presidents have been following for a number of years would call for the thirtieth.

I'll look around a bit more.

Either way, generally speaking, the congress does nothing in january and only starts to get serious in Feb.

The only thing the senate is planning today, other than, perhaps, a bit of housekeeping, is a resolution to honor the late pres. Ford.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Our Dems should be better than this. I'm embarrassed. Over a game.
Edited on Mon Jan-08-07 08:50 AM by ShortnFiery
:puke: Damn the American People, there's a game I have to view/attend. Is that what we pay our legislators to do? Pander. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. They reported that John Boehner requested it. HE'S A RETHUG .
They should have held class anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Is it any wonder that we call our Congress "Do Nothing"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #12
37. If that's true, I would have told him
"You got a TV in your room?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
29. Well, that's what politicians do, I suppose...
Pols are a different breed, and, apparently, showing up at massive functions is of primary importance.

And, it seems, pandering in every sense of the word, as recent scandals imply. Contrary to popular belief, not all political types are smarter than the rest of us, witness McConnell and whatzisname-the idiot who was in charge of environment and such last year.

(Dumber'n owl shit is the way most of them look to me)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. LOL, so true! Another name - Duncan Hunter ... LOL :-) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
27. According to the Majority Leader, the House will not be in session until Tuesday:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. Yeah, officially, at least.
They agreed on that on Friday, but then Steny Hoyer mumbled something about some of them would be meeting at four o'clock this afternoon. That's why I modified my post-to try to include that little exchange.

Mebbe he was talking about when they were gonna meet up at the football game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. Why do so many in this thread hate Murika and love the
terrists? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
14. Doesn't the game start a 9pm?
So what's the big deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
16. CNN up to it's same ol tricks.
Faux piles on too. rinse~rinse~repeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. We are at fault this time. Dem Leaders need to get acquainted with the word "NO" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. What 'tricks?' Is there anything inaccurate about this report?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
18. House Schedule-Read Here
Edited on Mon Jan-08-07 09:11 AM by dogday
http://www.c-span.org/pdf/2007calendar.pdf

Today they are off, but they plan on voting all this week....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Theduckno2 Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
19. Some of you aren't taking your knee-jerk medication!
Given Speaker Pelosi's Sunday interview and statements regarding Iraq, I would think that things might be a bit tumultuous in D.C today.

The Repulicans are probably looking for any excuse to buy time to formulate their response and the Dems, if Speaker Pelosi's comments garnered favorable polling, may wish to contemplate a more aggressive stance.

I hardly think this is decision is just about a football game.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 09:08 AM
Original message
Tempest In A Teapot
First, the game is a long standing U.S. tradition. To pretend it isn't happening or to pretend it's not important to millions of people would not be productive, from P.R. perspective.

Secondly, the game is at night. So, they're still gathering. They're just delaying some votes for a day.

This is apropos of nothing.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
24. The BCS has only existed since 1998, and its predecessor since 1992.
Edited on Mon Jan-08-07 09:31 AM by TahitiNut
While the 'Bowl' games go back to the 1901 Michigan-California Tournament of Roses game (the 'Rose Bowl' didn't start until 1923), initiated to make the Tournament of Roses Parade more successful, the BCS is relatively new ... like the corporatized names, which first appeared in 1988.

In the larger scheme of things, I agree it's trivial. It's telling, however, that such events are an orgy for the affluent ... places to "see and be seen." Easily half of all wage-earners in this country couldn't possibly afford to take a day off work and pay to attend a bowl game. That folks aren't keenly aware of the ever widening gap between the have's and have-not's when 'celebrating' such events show how banal poverty has become, imho.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #24
35. National Champsionships Go Back To Before The 1930's
I'm not a college football fan. (The wishbone and veer years turned me off, pretty much permanently.) But, i think it silly to not consider the night of the "biggest" college football game of the year to not be an important night to millions of americans.

To deny it is to simply look for a way to turn off the part of the electorate our philosophy is just starting to win.

The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
20. Dupe
Edited on Mon Jan-08-07 09:10 AM by ProfessorGAC
Sorry about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
21. FYI: Repukes are moving out s-l-o-w-l-y... Boxes everywhere.
Of course, the media isn't covering this.

Duh.

I was in Rangel's office last Friday afternoon (dropping off a
foundation report), and the halls were stacked with moving boxes.

Staffers were busy unpacking and orienting newbies.

The football game isn't the only game being played.

Here's a good link for the 110th agenda{/a}.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
22. big F*in deal. lets make a big to do out of this giving media the outrage
they are so hoping for with the dems, when this is so a non issue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyedyeto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
25. Why are people starting to believe what M$M tells them?
I've seen many comments on this thread that totally believe this BS 'story'. Why are they now believing what they are told?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #25
33. Would you like to provide so contradictory evidence?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
31. What's worse, they did this for JOHN BONER!
This guy deserves NOTHING. NADA. ZIP. BUPKIS.

I must admit, I'm pretty disgusted about this. It would be bad enough if it was a democrat, but to do this for that dickwad Boner, who did nothing during his tenure except hobble the democratic process, is just plain WRONG and bad business. Shame, Nancy. Bad start.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #31
36. Perhaps the majority was feeling a little guilty about using the house
rules to forcibly change the house rules. Personally, I am tickled to death that they took control in such an exemplary manner and I'm sure they'll give the puke side of the fence ample input in the future.

Nancy P garnered a boatload of positive stripes with her handling of the opening sessions and her appearance on FTN, this sunday, Pox and CNN not withstanding.

Unfortunately, (and I second your comments)ya' gotta work with what you have. Although I'm nervous as a betrayed cat and not well equipped to appreciate the slow speed, hurry up and wait pace of the way congress operates, I am heartened by the way they have begun.

Nancy Pelosi is dynamite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
38. Priorities.
It's all about priorities.

I live in a metro area with an NFL team. At a back to school night some years back when my older son was in 5th grade, Some parents explained to the teacher that their son might not always get his homework done over the weekend or on a Monday night because they had season tickets, and expected to attend every game.

And so kids grow up thinking that attending a game is more important than school, and so much more important than a silly job, even if you are an elected member of Congress.

And what's wrong with watching the game -- a night game as has already been pointed out -- and still getting in a full day's work?

If someone really wanted to invade this country they'd do it either on Thanksgiving Day, or on a Superbowl Sunday when the Redskins are playing. It would be hours before those supposedly in charge would even notice anything was amiss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC