Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The White House is trying to classify past visitor logs...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 10:04 PM
Original message
The White House is trying to classify past visitor logs...
Hey ya gotta give ABC credit for breaking this. There is no depth to which these people will stoop to cover up their corruption.

By PETE YOST

WASHINGTON Jan 5, 2007 (AP)— The White House and the Secret Service quietly signed an agreement last spring in the midst of the Jack Abramoff lobbying scandal declaring that records identifying visitors to the White House are not open to the public.

The Bush administration didn't reveal the existence of the memorandum of understanding until last fall. The White House is using it to deal with a legal problem on a separate front, a ruling by a federal judge ordering the production of Secret Service logs identifying visitors to the office of Vice President Dick Cheney.

In a federal appeals court filing three weeks ago, the administration's lawyers used the memo in a legal argument aimed at overturning the judge's ruling. The Washington Post is suing for access to the Secret Service logs.

The five-page document dated May 17 declares that all entry and exit data on White House visitors belongs to the White House as presidential records rather than to the Secret Service as agency records. Therefore, the agreement states, the material is not subject to public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act.


Read the full story here. http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2774077

These are the same logs that were used in the Whitewater and Lewinski witch hunts. These guys are slick. Let's just hope that there are still enough impartial judges in the Federal judiciary to strike this nonsense down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Before Jeff Gannon's sperm is even dry... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Bwah...haw..haw...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. he should be called before Congress--give him the Lewinsky treatment--ask if Bush catches or pitches
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. why not? they are allowed to get away with it - NOBODY is stopping them nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. POOF! They just did it. Jeff Gannon's in the clear. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spacelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. They do not seem to realize that this is OUR HOUSE! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Not with this guy...
This is King George. Annoited by birth to rule as he sees fit. Pitiful and it's up to us to stop him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. What was it Bush said?
Something about people who have something to hide and being secretive? Hmmmm. You don't suppose . . . ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
8. Is it Nixon vs. United States yet?
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
9. I wonder how many other Jeff Gannon's are out there that we
don't know about, not to mention some questionable Saudi nationals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
10. What excuse could they possibly use to rationalize this?
There honestly can't be any excuse that would legitimate making it impossible to find out who is entering the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
11. What's next? Will they try to classify photographs?


There's something rude I want to write, but I won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. OMG, that is a VERY DISTURBED MAN.
Edited on Sat Jan-06-07 02:25 AM by WinkyDink
Not to mention revolting.

WHAT THE HELL IS HE THINKING?! Please, someone analyze this man in this regard (I've read "Bush on the Couch"). Bush has a seriously whacked bald-head fetish that borders on the messianic---not to mention sexual.

That IS Gannon, is it not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. The place I found it said it was Mr. Gannon.
Edited on Sat Jan-06-07 02:41 AM by Octafish
Another DUer who saw it said it wasn't.

Perhaps one of the people there would be brave enough to comment publicly?



Either way, he's a hands on kind of guy. Lips, too. Condescending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Gannon's not that good looking.
Edited on Sat Jan-06-07 02:57 AM by Bluebear
He has that hard, aging whore look.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC