The battle of Iraq's wounded - U.S. poorly equipped to care for tens of thousands of soldiers...

[bridgit]

'THE NEW YEAR brought with it the 3,000th American death in Iraq. But what's equally alarming — and far less well known — is that for every fatality in Iraq, there are 16 injuries. That's an unprecedented casualty level. In the Vietnam and Korean wars, by contrast, there were fewer than three people wounded for each fatality. In World Wars I and II, there were less than two.

That means we now have more than 50,000 wounded Iraq war soldiers. In one sense, this reflects positive change: Better medical care and stronger body armor are enabling many more soldiers to survive injuries that might have led, in earlier generations, to death. But like so much else about this war, the Bush administration failed to foresee what it would mean, failed to plan for the growing tide of veterans who would be in urgent need of medical and disability care. The result is that as the Iraq war approaches its fourth anniversary, the Department of Veterans Affairs is buckling under a growing volume of disability claims and rising demand for medical attention.'

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-bilmes5jan05,0,6627236.story?coll=la-opinion-rightrail

[teach1st]

1. The people who support Bush...

...and who also claim to be supporting our troops, are just in denial...sad, sad, denial.

[bridgit]

2. complete & utter denial, so as to warrant the tag 'fantasy prone', or 'dementia'...

[northofdenali]

3. So sad.

Dementia isn't a strong enough word. My father-in-law (86) has "senile dementia", which is different from Alzheimers - and he isn't even this delusional.

[bridgit]

4. and then there's that...

:hi: :hug: