Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush WARNS DEMOCRATS In Op Ed He Supposedly Wrote For Wall Street Journal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:42 AM
Original message
Bush WARNS DEMOCRATS In Op Ed He Supposedly Wrote For Wall Street Journal
Edited on Wed Jan-03-07 09:55 AM by kpete
President Bush pens WSJ op-ed, calls for balanced budget by 2012

Mike Sheehan
Published: Wednesday January 3, 2007



President George W. Bush has written an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal that will appear in its pages today.

In a lengthy piece intended to address the new Congress, the President cites Sep. 11, indicates his continued opposition to tax hikes, and projects a balanced federal budget by 2012.

Discussing the nation's priorities, Bush first lists "defeating the terrorists who killed thousands of innocent Americans on September 11, 2001 -- and who are working hard to attack us again." He also indicates that he will talk more about a new strategy in coming days.

.....................

Bush acknowledges an important message he took from the last election, that Americans seek an end to "pork-barrel projects that have never been reviewed or voted on by Congress." He takes a jab at Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV) and Rep. David Obey (D-WI): " heard that message, too, and have indicated they will refrain from including additional earmarks in the continuing resolution for this fiscal year."

In closing, Bush gives a dramatic warning to the newly empowered Democrats. "If the Congress chooses to pass bills that are simply political statements, they will have chosen stalemate. If a different approach is taken, the next two years can be fruitful ones for our nation."

Excerpts from the subscription-only op-ed follow...


I believe that when America is willing to use her influence abroad, the American people are safer and the world is more secure. I believe that wealth does not come from government. It comes from the hard work of America's workers, entrepreneurs and small businesses. I believe government closest to the people is more responsive and accountable. I believe government plays an important role in helping those who can't help themselves. Yet we must always remember that when people are hurting, they need a caring person, not a government bureaucracy.

These are all common-sense principles, and they provide the basis for how I will approach governing with the new Congress. We've proved it can be done: When our nation was attacked, Republicans and Democrats came together to pass the Patriot Act and reform our intelligence agencies. When our economy was struggling, we worked together to pass tax relief that has helped our economy grow, create jobs, and raise the standard of living for the American people. When we saw that our public schools were failing our children, we came together to pass the No Child Left Behind Act, insisting on high standards, accountability and better options for parents.

...

e can help Iraq defeat the extremists inside and outside of Iraq -- and we can help provide the necessary breathing space for this young government to meet its responsibilities. If democracy fails and the extremists prevail in Iraq, America's enemies will be stronger, more lethal, and emboldened by our defeat. Leaders in both parties understand the stakes in this struggle. We now have the opportunity to build a bipartisan consensus to fight and win the war.

...

It is also a fact that our tax cuts have fueled robust economic growth and record revenues. Because revenues have grown and we've done a better job of holding the line on domestic spending, we met our goal of cutting the deficit in half three years ahead of schedule. By continuing these policies, we can balance the federal budget by 2012 while funding our priorities and making the tax cuts permanent. In early February, I will submit a budget that does exactly that. The bottom line is tax relief and spending restraint are good for the American worker, good for the American taxpayer, and good for the federal budget...


more at:
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Pres._Bush_oped_Cites_911_rejects_0103.html

I especially like his claim that he can solve "complex" problems

Together, we have a chance to serve the American people by solving the complex problems that many don't expect us to tackle, let alone solve, in the partisan environment of today's Washington. To do that, however, we can't play politics as usual. Democrats will control the House and Senate, and therefore we share the responsibility for what we achieve


http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/1/3/51935/98666
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. How dare that clown preach to anyone about 'common sense
principals'!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. I not only don't believe for a second that he wrote it...
Edited on Wed Jan-03-07 09:46 AM by Virginia Dare
I highly doubt he ever even read it.

He (or whoever the author is) talks about now having an "opportunity for bipartisanship". What a crock of bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. How did they translate the crayon scribbles?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. "President Bush pens"
First lie in first three words of the title.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Two lies.
The first was when they referred to Governor Bush as the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. balanced budget by 2012
So what would the national debt be then (10 trillion, 20 trillion?). Keep in mind the important distinction between the annual budget and the national debt. By the way, his chance of getting a balanced budget with his methods is zip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinbgoode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. In the Wall Street Journal?
Bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha. . .

Maybe Bush can warn Democrats about his family ties to the Moonies in his next installment of "How the President, as God-annointed sovereign of America, has the right to endorse a self-proclaimed South Korean "monarch of America" as our official "Christian" ayatolluh.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. "I believe ..blah blah blah"
It's long past time to remove this idiot from office. God he makes me sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
9. Bush* is a known LIAR with zero credibility
It matters not what he says he wrote for it has no meaning. He has zero credibility......So my answer to this is "Listen to the wind blow"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. Why is the Leaker-in-Chief still free to spread his bilge? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
11. Any english comp teachers out there? Can you check this piece agains >
> other examples of his writing/speaking to see if there's any chance he wrote it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Another example here - for comparison


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritersBlock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. Excellent! LOL! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. I bet he knows diddly about parallel structures, which are evident here as well as in all his
Edited on Wed Jan-03-07 10:20 AM by WinkyDink
other "speeches". So he employs a "write by numbers" scribe, with the parallellism always with triples (I.e., "I believe...I believe...I believe...". "When...When...When...".).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #11
24. I analyzed it here:
http://obsidian.sktyler.com/tools/writer/sample.php

Comes in at about a 9th grade level. His extemporaneous speakling usually comes in around 4th grade. (I've checked.) He didn't write it. I doubt he's even READ it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Cannon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. If Bush wrote this...
then I wrote "Catcher in the Rye".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parisle Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
12. Sorry,... 2012 is too late,....
---- The democrats ought to adopt the sort of "lifeboat" approach to the budget which will truly wake people up,... the approach which Cap. John Smith used at Jamestown, if you will,.... and get a budget mostly in balance within the next two years. Tax increases and a cut-off of war funds are definitely indicated,.. but the real challenge to the democrats is the extent to which they can get mainstream America "engaged" in the overall economic problem,..... much in the same manner employed by Perot in '92. Bush's 2012 "target" is simply a way of saying his gargantuan deficits weren't really that bad. They were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
14. If the Democrats fall for his lies once again..
They deserve whatever comes their way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
15. More empty rhetoric about 9-11.
Discussing the nation's priorities, Bush first lists "defeating the terrorists who killed thousands of innocent Americans on September 11, 2001 -- and who are working hard to attack us again."


Too bad he diverted enormous financial and military assets from Afghanistan to Iraq - a nation that had NOTHING to do with 9-11 and had no WMDs to boot. The job in Afghanistan was not completed. The Taliban, who harbored and supported Bin Laden, is gaining power again and Bin Laden is still at large. Not to mention the Iraq war is creating even more terrorists according to the report that was made public a few months back. If we get attacked again the Administration will have itself to blame for its botched response to 9-11.

I know I'm preaching to the choir here, but this kind of BS ticks me off. He really must think we are all brainwashed.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
16. "I believe in repeating bromides and cliches ad nauseam..."
"...without ever actually stating what I will do to help see my beliefs come to fruition." - W

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
17. And he sat on his ARSE for 6 years when his party was in control because...????
"we have a chance to serve the American people by solving the complex problems that many don't expect us to tackle, let alone solve, in the partisan environment of today's Washington."

OMG, how this man lives, I have no idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
19. If he wrote that OP-ED piece then I'm gonna be Feb 2007 Playboy Centerfold
This guy has the mental capacity of a gnat. Someone else wrote it and then told Bush to sign his name. And since it's the Wall Street Journal, no one at that paper would ever consider questioning who wrote it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
20. What I did on my six year vacation by Gorge B.
Take solace in these words New Orleans: "Yet we must always remember that when people are hurting, they need a caring person, not a government bureaucracy".

The article's title could use some CNN graphics: George Bu$h penis!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
21. Oh Dear God.....he's at it again. The ridiculousness of his "penning" an
Op Ed for WSJ...is laughable. One of his think tanks penned that Op Ed and it's only there to poke a stick at those in Congress once again...showing them he's still the Dictator. Vicious twerp....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedStateShame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
22. Translation: "YOU WON'T IMPEACH ME!!! (raspberry noises)"
There you go, Dems. Really. Put this bastard in a prison before 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. That should be their reply to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
23. only thing drom his head
prettied up by writters, is his version of 'bipartisan' ands veiled threats.

and repeating his BELIEFS that the budget will get balanced by the tax cut fairy.
lose a tax, get more money!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
27. If the Congress chooses to pass bills that are simply political statements -
they will find themselves being flung from hotel balconies by the Rove Hit Squad (RHS).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
28. HE and the Repukes have been running things like a one-party state
and he has the nerve to "write" this piece of crap op-ed?

Screw him and the Reupkes. The Dems need to keep their promises and pass some bills. Keep sending them to Bush so he can veto. Let America see that Bush and his Repukes are liars anyways.

Bi-partisanship my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
30. I believe he wrote it.
That is one poorly written letter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
31. why didn't you balance the budget when your republicans were in control?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
32. more narcissistic and fascist tripe.
this guy certainly gets the gall award.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC