Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Since when does a thread have to be "helpful" to be allowed to exist?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-30-06 02:18 AM
Original message
Since when does a thread have to be "helpful" to be allowed to exist?
Edited on Sat Dec-30-06 02:19 AM by Nikki Stone1
LA Woman's thread is entirely legitimate. I disagree with some of her points, but her overall thesis, that far less monstrous people than Saddam Hussein--and even arguably some good people--have been vilified after death here on the board is worthy of debate. Yet Saddam Hussein, a brutal thug, gets sympathy from many. I understand that most of us feel that Saddam's hanging is some kind of grisley PR victory for Junior, even though Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11 and even though the US supported this brutal dictator as long as he was doing our bidding. I also understand that US troops, commanded by mercenaries (like CACI) are keeping some forms of torture alive in the very place where Saddam did some of his worst work.

I get the rage at George W. AWOL. There is no moral victory for him in all this. Someone wrote that it was an expensive hit and I am inclined to agree.

On the other hand, Saddam Hussein was not Mother Teresa and the world is not losing a bright light but an incredibly brutal dictator. LA Woman had the right to ask why the double standard: Why is Jon Benet Ramsey's mom (or Aaron Spelling for chrissake!) a more worthy target for vilification than someone who actually killed people? LA Woman had a good point.

Locking her thread because "it wasn't helpful" is odd. First, what does that mean, not helpful? How many damned threads on DU GD are helpful? Take a look at all the "I'm leaving" threads where people bitch and moan that DU is uncivil, mean, unkind to puppies, etc. These threads don't get locked.

Look at some of the silliness that gets left up. For every brilliant thread by H2O Man or Kpete or Nancy Gregs, there are 20 threads on "Why Hillary can't win" "Why Obama can't win" "Why the Democrats are weenies" etc. Are those kinds of threads helpful?

Before you lock this thread for not being helpful, it might be worthwhile to do some thinking about what we stand for here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-30-06 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Locking.
If you have a concern about DU Moderation, please contact the DU Admins privately: http://www.democraticunderground.com/contact.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC