Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How Suite It Isn’t: A Dearth of Female Bosses

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 12:27 PM
Original message
How Suite It Isn’t: A Dearth of Female Bosses
NYT: How Suite It Isn’t: A Dearth of Female Bosses
By JULIE CRESWELL
Published: December 17, 2006

.... While top business schools are churning out an increasing number of female M.B.A.’s, only about 16 percent of corporate officers at Fortune 500 companies are women, according to Catalyst, an organization that studies women in the workplace. The numbers are even sparer at the top of the pyramid: women fill only nine, or less than 2 percent, of the chief executive jobs at Fortune 500 companies.

“There have been women in the pipeline for 20 to 25 years; progress has been slower than anybody thought it ever would be,” laments Julie H. Daum, the North American board practice leader for Spencer Stuart, the executive search firm. She says she does not expect the situation to change anytime soon....No one disputes that more women have highly visible roles as chief executives. During the past year alone, several women joined the ultra-exclusive C.E.O. club, taking the reins at large, prominent Fortune 500 companies. In June, Irene B. Rosenfeld was named the chief executive of Kraft Foods, a job that once eluded her earlier in her career at Kraft; she joined a competitor before she returned to the company. Two months earlier, Patricia A. Woertz jumped from the Chevron Corporation to become chief executive at the chemical giant Archer Daniels Midland. Those two anointments were followed by Indra Nooyi’s ascent to the top seat at PepsiCo.

Even so, those women remain statistical anomalies. And the complex question of why women remain so underrepresented in the corporate suite yields a variety of possible answers. A number of women leave their careers — sometimes by choice, sometimes not — to focus on rearing families. The remaining pool suffers from a lack of networking or mentoring programs, others contend.

Many other women end up in dead-end staff positions, says Ilene H. Lang, president of Catalyst. “Women are almost two and one half times as likely to be channeled into staff jobs like H.R. and communications than into operating roles where they would be generating revenue and managing profit and loss,” Ms. Lang says. “When more women hold line positions, there will be more women top earners and C.E.O.’s.”

Analysts and executive women also say that one of the biggest roadblocks between women and the c-suite is the thick layer of men who dominate boardrooms and corner offices across the country. “The men in the boardroom and the men at the top are choosing and tend to choose who they are comfortable with: other men,” (Carol) Bartz says....

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/17/business/yourmoney/17csuite.html?ei=5094&en=f5a250fe7f24f30d&hp=&ex=1166418000&partner=homepage&pagewanted=all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Compounding the problem...
Some of the few "women" who have made it, or feel they are on the "track," become convinced the path is lined by powerful men and that other women colleagues are "expendable" as they attempt to engratiate themselves to the "good ole boys." Some women in management are more ruthless than any man I've seen--but to other women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kedrys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree
I have a female boss right now, and she's made no bones about not giving a rat's ass how many bodies (men and women) she leaves in her wake on her way to the top. She'd been in her present position like 15 minutes when she announced she was gunning for her boss' job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. There are some progressive men who could/would be helpful...
(and are the ones who ultimately would be necessary for any woman to advance), but they do not recognize this pattern--or at least don't believe it is THEIR place (via action or policies) to step in and stop it. When they DO recognize the pattern, most often I see them "shake their heads" and bemoan how "nasty" or "unfair" or whatever the adjective, that women are to each other. They don't, however, intervene and so they become ENABLERS.

Most of the time they don't recognize what is going on (and why should they when the woman in question is playing up to them with flattery and "brown-nosery" all the time)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC