Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So: what can Scaife dig up on Edwards?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 12:30 AM
Original message
So: what can Scaife dig up on Edwards?
Edwards seems something like Clinton without the Clenis and without a quite as strong a fetish for anti-worker trade policies. In short, he sounds damn threatening to the GOP. What will Scaife et al dig up about him? Anybody from his state know the kind of thing we should be prepared for? Or has KKKarl rendered the Scaife style of smearing hopelessly obsolete?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BelleCarolinaPeridot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. So far nothing ... absolutely nothing.
I remember something about PS3s a couple of weeks ago but ooh scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. If he can't find anything, he'll have his trolls make something up
The best thing Edwards can do is just laugh at it.

Too many candidates get trapped into answering this stuff, thus giving it a dignity it should never have.

Unless they pin a murder or pederasty on him, he should just laugh it off.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Most people are wise to the dirty politics of the right
Edwards lost a son and his wife fought breast cancer.

The right wing will interject "Pony boy likes Suave Shampoo"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. There are too many that are not wise enough to see through this
They are swayed by their prejudices. Harold Ford in his race for Senator was slimed by Karl Rove's tactics. The facts weren't there but the people wanted to believe it would be true and voted against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Yes, Harold Ford was slammed by the fundies, big time
The playboy ad against him was purely racist. Fundies backed that completely.

John Edwards is a class act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Kerry tried to laugh off the swiftboaters.
I think laughing off well funded slander has been proved to be a mistake. The answer it to hit back quick and hard. Knock them off their feet while they're still gloating over their attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #9
44. That was a little different
because they were distorting historical fact and had PRINTED it. Kerry had grounds to sue and I will never forgive him for not doing so.

The point isn't always to win the suit. Sometimes the point is to shine a strong light on the cockroaches.

The problem with hitting back like you suggest is that Democrats have been getting bogged down in hitting back at the barrage of shit from the GOP slime machine.

The better tactic is to identify the slimers for what they are, to let people know they're just more partisan LIARS, and then to laugh off the ridiculous claims as "Oh, there they go again. I guess they're going to bring out the cannibalism tomorrow."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. they will find nothing.. but they will try
and if they fail... they will make something up. They have no concept of "fair play" :mad:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. His wife had CANCER!!!!!!!!!!!
HE is TRULY scarred by the experience and will likely die of CANCER w/in 18-24 months.


We at Scaife Warmogeriopia are sad to tell you the facts, but there they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. He also lost his 16 year old boy
They came through it with dignity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
24. No they did NOT (MSM talkin')
They are PERMANENTLY scarred - those scars will cause CANCER and they will DIE... just look at his wife.... he has only MONTHS to live.


They'll find a doc to support them on every network - and parents of deceased children will be given months to live by a REPUTABLE Doc right before the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Montauk6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
29. The Good Lawd Juheezles put that mole on his lip for a REASON, glory!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. I love John and Elizabeth Edwards
They are America. They are beautiful people who want to uplift all Americans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. I think if anything was
to be found - they would have dug it up in 2004 - I think Edwards is on the up and up and the real deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
10. He was a "Trial Lawyer"!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:wow::wow::wow::wow::wow::wow::wow::wow::wow:

Heavens to Betsy!!!!!

:wow::wow::wow::wow::wow::wow::wow::wow::wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yes, he was a trial lawyer who fought for the injured and diseased
W's lawyers fight for the privileged and corporate elitists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
35. This means that he knows how to fight (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReadTomPaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
11. They will use the trial lawyer angle, most likely.
Edited on Sun Dec-17-06 12:48 AM by ReadTomPaine
In 2004 election there was a failed GOP attempt to smear him over a jacuzzi negligence suit, but this backfired for several reasons- especially once the details of the suit and the young Valerie Lakey's horrible injuries became more widely publicized.

Dick Armey's quote at the time: Edwards represents a "well-connected swarm of trial lawyers who twist our legal system to pillage the productive sector for personal gain."

Expect more the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. The Repugs will be using so many "trial lawyers" in the next couple of years..
that it may render that argument moot. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReadTomPaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. Actually, a prominent GOP politico retained Edwards himself in a trial case..
similar to the suit I mentioned above. It may have been either Dennis Hastert or Newt Gingrich, I don't recall. This of course didn't stop them from denoucing his profession or performance a few years later when he announced his run. Perhaps a fellow DUer can recall the details..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. When doctors were bleeding people with leeches...
...lawyers were writing the Constitution.

I always liked that line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReadTomPaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #15
26. As an aside - believe it or not leeches and maggots are back in medicine...
Check it out.. (and that's a great line, nevertheless!)

http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2004-07-07-leeches-maggots_x.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #26
39. I did know that, actually...
leeches were used on me when I had a tissue graft. They're some motivated little guys. But I never stop giving the Doc hell over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Dick Armey is seen as a joke much like DeLay
As is Ashcroft, Gonzales, and the rest of them. Edwards and his wife are seen as true Americans, not corporate hacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justgamma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
13. I will tell you what they will
do. Expect to hear a bunch of commercials about him being a "greedy trial lawyer". They've been vilifying lawyers for a long time.

They ran anti-lawyer ads in Iowa the whole election season.

Currently, they are running ads in Illinois against lawsuits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. Ah, ask them to look at the GOP lawyers
Those who aren't running scared because they've been called on the Patriot Act, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #13
23. As if the GOP didn't stick in their lawyers
Get real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
16. I would guess they'll rehash all the cases he fought as a trial
attorney, and blow everything out of proportion, claiming "Just look at the kind of people hehad a clients!"

Of course no one knows what else might be out there somewhere. I believe ANYONE who manages to be elected a Senator, Governor, or any other high office, has SOME skeletons...we all do. Terrible ones? Probably not, but things we would prefer to keep in the past. We'll just have to wait and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. John and Elizabeth Edwards have class
They've lost a 16 year old boy, and fought breast cancer
with courage, class, and dignity. One heck of a class act.

Newt deserted a wife when she had breast cancer, Rudi and Newt are known as womanizers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
25. Probably something like this???
And this is from 2004.

http://www.laweekly.com/news/news/a-populist-make-over/2034/

Edwards’ legislative record — what little there is of it — is hardly populist. In fact, Edwards is a classic, corporate-friendly, centrist New Democrat. In his five years as a freshman senator, Edwards on his own produced little legislation, much less than some other first-termers — although he was assigned by Tom Daschle to represent the Democrats in negotiations over a patients’ bill of rights, and so can boast he was a co-sponsor of the final, but aborted, bill.

However, there’s one highly significant chapter in his Senate career omitted from Edwards’ campaign Web site. Edwards, who comes from a state where banking is big business, played a critical role in brokering legislation to allow banks to sell mutual funds and insurance, and to engage in other speculative ventures. This law, worth hundreds of billions to the banks, blasted a gigantic hole in the Glass-Steagal banking law’s firewall of protections designed to prevent the kinds of bank collapses that marked the Great Depression of the ’30s — meaning that it put the money of Joe Six-Pack depositors at risk. Such a gigantic boon to the banking lobby can hardly be classed as a populist victory.

If there was real depth to Edwards’ rhetorical populism, one would expect to find it in “Real Solutions for America.” That’s the 60-page campaign booklet that Edwards refers to in his stump speech. But when one checks out these “real solutions” (available on his Web site), one finds a lot of nice-sounding hot air, some innocuous small-bore proposals — and few specific details. On a number of important matters — example: federal corporate welfare — the “solutions” Edwards’ speeches describe as “bold” involve . . . appointing a commission.

Sometimes, the pamphlet contradicts Edwards’ reality. Example: “Some tax lawyers make millions through flimsy letters telling clients how to shelter their income. Edwards will stop these abuses,” it claims. But in 1995, Edwards — already a multimillionaire — set up a professional corporation to shelter at least $10 million in legal earnings from having to pay Medicare taxes on them, saving himself some $290,000, according to the News and Observer, which quoted a top specialist from the American Institute of CPAs as labeling this trick “gaming the system.” Populist hypocrisy?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
27. Nothing to do with Scaife, but my dad lived in NC way back when,
he's an astute Dem, and he never liked Edwards. I don't know, but I trust Dad's instincts. And as I recall, NCers didn't like him either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. "Way back when" Edwards wasn't in politics. Maybe your dad's thinking about
John Edward?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. As in John and Elizabeth Edwards? Yes, that's the guy. It wasn't
Edited on Sun Dec-17-06 01:58 AM by babylonsister
that long ago, about 4 years, Dad didn't like John Edwards. I'll have to ask him again. And yes, I'm talking about John Edwards from NC. Perhaps he's too 'political' and always has been. Grasping for the holy grail can be/get ugly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. He didn't like him when he was beating a Republican in his first race for
office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. He didn't like him at all, Dem or not. The run-up to the prez run, the
v.p. run, he was not trusted by my dad. He thought Edwards was a failure in NC, which I imagine colored his thinking. They are both wiser and older now, whatever that might count for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. I watched his farewell tour of NC on C-Span
Edited on Sun Dec-17-06 02:11 AM by 1932
A lot of people stood up and thanked him for bringing projects to their small towns.

I listened to Elizabeth Edwards interviewed on her book tour on the net a couple weeks ago. A woman said that she wished John had done more for her town. Elizabeth then listed projects that he supported in her community (one was financing a room in the local library). The woman who made the comment said she had no idea and said that she would go back and make sure everyone knew what he'd done.

Some people seem to know the facts. Some people seem to believe what's printed in their right wing NC newspapers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. And some people believe what they want to believe.
It's all good, and may the best man or woman survive and win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #38
40. And some people rely on facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. Get off your high horse. It's too early for it. I like John and
Elizabeth Edwards, I happen to like Senator John Kerry more. If you don't, I don't really want to hear about it.
I was relaying what my dad, who lived in NC, thought about him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. It's also too early for the hearsay bs.
Edited on Sun Dec-17-06 10:27 AM by 1932
Way back when in '98 wasn't that long ago. And I like reading about hearsay opinions just as much as the next person here at DU, but I like to know what facts are informing them. Check with your dad and ask him what's informing his opinion and let us know. That might actually help people here make decisions about who to support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
28. Mann Coulter said he had soft hands, which is funny because she
meant it as a feminizing insult. But Edwards played wide receiver at Clemson before transferring to NC State when he didn't get an athletic scholarship after freshman year, and "soft hands" is a compliment for a wide receiver. So Mann's an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReadTomPaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. She should talk - her hands look like feet.
Edited on Sun Dec-17-06 01:53 AM by ReadTomPaine
Which would make her face an ass, come to think of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
36. It does not matter what they can "dig" or "fabricate"
what is important is to get James Carville on board to pounce back at any attack - real or imaginary - the way Clinton did in 1992.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #36
42. Jeeze. Where've you been? If you want Hil, Carville's your man.
He totally dissed Dr. Dean who enabled this winning election to happen. Carville is a HC tool; if you like the way he's being worked, then that will make you happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MOB Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
45. If Anything, It would have been Found Already
If Anything, It would have been Found during the '03 / '04 race. All they seem to have on him is that he used to be a trial lawyer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gauguin57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
46. Repugs I talk to all wanna tell me he was an "ambulance chaser"
An evil, moneygrubbing attorney, back in the day.

So, that will, of course, be beaten to death on Fox News. AGAIN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC