Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Federal Judge: Bush's Law Denying Legal Rights to 12 Million LEGAL Immigrants Is UNCONSTITUTIONAL

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 08:23 PM
Original message
Federal Judge: Bush's Law Denying Legal Rights to 12 Million LEGAL Immigrants Is UNCONSTITUTIONAL
Edited on Thu Dec-14-06 08:24 PM by kpete
Federal judge issues split decision on new Military Commissions Act
By David G. Savage


WASHINGTON — In the first legal decision on a federal law that denies access to U.S. courts to detainees in the war on terrorism, a federal judge ruled Wednesday that foreign prisoners held at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, could not sue for freedom.

But, in a split decision, U.S. District Judge James Robertson also ruled that the law's denial of that right to the more than 12 million legal immigrants living in the United States was unconstitutional.

The first part of the ruling affirmed what Congress intended when it passed the Military Commissions Act in October. The decision came in the case of Salim Hamdan, the onetime driver to Osama bin Laden, who won what appeared to be a landmark victory in the Supreme Court in June.

Taking up Hamdan's lawsuit, the high court's justices said President Bush had overstepped his power when he created a system of military tribunals for foreign-born alleged terrorists.

more at:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003476629_detainees14.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. So, we can round up any non-citizen, anywhere in the world
on any trumped up charges and imprison them and torture them indefinitely without charges or trial, and this is perfectly legal?

I thougth the Supreme court had already stepped on that. I guess I was wrong... x(

I'm happy that part of the law was overturned, but the rest has to go too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC