Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

****OFFICIAL LA-2 RUNOFF RACE (William Jefferson-freezer cash man) THREAD****

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:13 PM
Original message
****OFFICIAL LA-2 RUNOFF RACE (William Jefferson-freezer cash man) THREAD****
Edited on Sat Dec-09-06 09:38 PM by ncrainbowgrrl
Allegedly, polls close at 8pm CST in Louisiana. Well, it's 9:14 EST right now- 8:14 CST.

Link to Election results from WWLTV.com -http://www.wwltv.com/
Link to the results as they come in from Sec of State's office: http://www.sos.louisiana.gov:8090/cgibin/?rqstyp=elcms2&rqsdta=120906
One more link- from WGNO-TV New Orleans: http://abc26.trb.com/news/politics/wgno-elections-framed,0,7448418.framedurl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Another link for results-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. kick
:kick:

Ok, I'll stop kicking my own thread now! Hope this doesn't sink!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. with 30% reporting,
Jefferson's ahead 53/47
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. No results so far (from the second link).
Edited on Sat Dec-09-06 09:39 PM by cat_girl25
Thanks for the links! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yankeeinlouisiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. 53 - 47, Jefferson
30% vote in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I can't believe that many people would vote for that scumbag.
However, 62% or something like that voted for Hastert in his district so, meh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LA lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I was afraid of this. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Jefferson was hitting his socially conservative side hard in the ads
Edited on Sat Dec-09-06 09:36 PM by Ken Burch
attacking his opponent for being pro gay-marriage, which probably got him a chunk of evangelical votes. He probably got the votes of other GOP supporters who wanted to screw up the Dems by sending a Dem sleazebag back to Congress to embarass Pelosi & Co. And, unfortunately, even a lot of African-American voters in LA are conservative compared to the national party.

So there was always a strong possibility Jefferson could scrape through with this sort of a campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. This makes the case for LA needing closed primaries
Jefferson won't be in that seat in two years from now...but unfortunately that may because he will get indicted. Is it still possible to refuse him his seat? Also, what will Pelosi do with his committee assignments? Will they be restored?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. It would be a bad precedent to refuse to seat the choice
...of the voters, just because he's being investigated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Sadly you are right
I just hope he doesn't get indicted within the next two years. Also, it's possible that he may refuse to resign even in that case. I'd like to know why the DCCC and the DNC didn't help fund Carter? Technically this is a general election race, so it's not like they're intervening in a primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. He's going to be indicted
The guy was taped accepting a bribe and the money was later found in his freezer. The case is crystal-clear. But of course the plan was to wait and hope he was returned to Congress before this occurs.

A person can't serve in Congress from prison though, so you can bet that he won't be sitting in his seat at the end of next term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. He's gone in two years
And I agree that he's a crook. I don't care if he's a Democrat (and he's not a very loyal one either...he voted for fucking CAFTA and made National Guardsmen take him to his house when NOLA was flooded so he could get something, possibly money) he deserves to go to jail if he's indicted, and I just hope he resigns if that indictment is served. If he doesn't, then we can always strip him of his committee assignments again or even kick him out of the caucus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #10
31. I think LA is getting a primary system come 2008
And what I can't understand is why Democrats didn't go all out to defeat Jefferson. If I were Pelosi I would've sent Bill Clinton and Barack Obama to New Orleans to campaign for Carter and dumped a few million into her campaign from national funds.

I would make sure that the media notices that Democrats take care of our corruption problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. more than a third (38%)of the vote in and the Indie -former Dem- Jefferson leads by 6% n/t
Edited on Sat Dec-09-06 09:38 PM by papau
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LA lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Independent?
he is running as a Democrat...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. my error - I saw the "I" next to name and thought indie rather than incumbent - time for bed n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. If William Jefferson wins, and he goes to prison within the next
...2 years, then Karen Carter will be in a good position for a rematch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. And Jefferson going to prison could swing the House back to the GOP in 2008
If the MSM can get away with the "both parties are corrupt" theme (even though the Congressional Caucus and the LA Democratic Party didn't endorse him!) The only thing preventing that is if investigations reveal the corruption of the Bush Administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I doubt it'll have much an effect
He's just one Democrat who's been ostrachized by the main party. STill loks bad for the district though.

I bet the only reason Jefferson hasn't been indicted yet is because of this though, they only wanted to indict him AFTER the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. You do have a point
If Tom DeLay was the only person to get indicted, then corruption would not have been as much of an issue. But Libby got indicted, and Rove came close. Then you had Duke Cunningham and Jack Abramoff and MZM. People like Katherine Harris and Richard Pombo and John Sweeney were emblematic of GOP INSTITUTIONAL corruption. Then you had Foley. Also, if we can investigate this administration, then their legal troubles will overshadow Jefferson's.

...Of course, Alan Mollohan of West Virginia is also facing a probe, and he (like Jefferson and Murtha and Maxine Waters) is also on CREW's list of Most Corrupt Members of Congress. Two of the Democrats listed on it are under investigation. If he gets indicted before the next election day, then his troubles, combined with Jefferson's, could hurt us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Mollohan might be more of a problem
since he has more standing in the party. Jefferson is a complete pariah who by an independent group's power rankings is current the least powerful member of Congress.

Still none of these people are in the position DeLay is, and there's nothing as widespread as the Abramoff situation against the Democrats. But anything negative doesn't help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. If he's indicted, at least we can say that we didn't support him
Pelosi can point out how she took away his seniority, and how the LA Democratic Party endorsed Carter as their candidate instead. He's basically like Lieberman at this point...an "Independent Democrat" as far as I'm concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Worth nothing that
after the FBI raid on his office, it was Hastert who was his strongest defender and loudest in condemning the raid. Crooks of a feather stick together clearly. The Democrats need to point out most of his supporters ever since the case broke have been Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. The Republicans blew their chance to neutralize corruption when Hastert said that
...Or blew their corruption in 2006 I should say. Sadly, we will have to divert our time and effort to getting rid of Jefferson and reminding the electorate that we didn't and don't support him...time that could have been spent going after BushCo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. No
Hastert was actually taking a principled stand on the separation of powers. The executive branch cannot just march into the legislative branch and start snooping around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Wouldn't be a rematch
Jefferson won't be running in 2008, that's pretty much assured. even if he pulls through he'll most likely only be able to vote from a prison cell in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yankeeinlouisiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
22. It's still 56/44
Jefferson -- 51% reporting.

Nooooo, Karen has to win!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Now 58/42
with 53% reporting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Great. Victory for the sleazebag.
Thank you, conservative Democrats. Thanks a bunch. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LouisianaLiberal Donating Member (848 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
30. WBRZ in Baton Rouge
Edited on Sat Dec-09-06 11:06 PM by LouisianaLiberal
says Carter now ahead at 55%. Don't know what the final outcome will be, but looks promising at this point.

On edit: No other web site or TV station seems to agree with this - perhaps a mistake on WBRZ's part. In any event, we'll find out soon enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
32. Bleh, what the fuck is wrong with New Orleans?!
Any district that'd reelect this scumbag over another Democrat has serious issues.

Whatever the case, anyone who voted for Jefferson just caused more problems for the national party. A big FUCK YOU goes out to all of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC