|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 12:16 AM Original message |
There is no excuse for anyone who voted for the IWR, and they should NOT run for President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 12:22 AM Response to Original message |
1. Agreed. They can't really defend it, they can only lie about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 12:28 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. There were people in Congress and outside of Congress who were against the IWR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 12:24 AM Response to Original message |
2. There's no excuse for anyone who hasn't addressed polarization of wealth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 12:30 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I agree with your premise also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 01:14 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. If I had to chose between IWR Yes-voter and IWR No voter and the No voter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
featherman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
5. It's not like EVERYBODY voted for it...some stood on principle and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 08:34 AM Response to Reply #5 |
19. It is the ones who voted against it, or were against it that should lead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demobrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 01:14 AM Response to Original message |
6. I agree totally. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karash (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 01:51 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 08:38 AM Response to Reply #8 |
20. Not the same thing. People have DIED because of the IWR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 02:19 AM Response to Original message |
9. been there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 02:40 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Your final paragraph is a crock |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 06:56 AM Response to Reply #10 |
15. yet, Byrd campaigned for Kerry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 08:54 AM Response to Reply #15 |
24. Not at all, Byrd's position on the war was very clear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 01:41 PM Response to Reply #24 |
33. Byrd rejected your premise that one should not vote for a candidate who supported the IWR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 08:45 AM Response to Reply #10 |
23. We have enough potential Democratic candidates who did the right thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 02:49 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Eliminates alot of thinking, at the least |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 03:18 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. When I think of my country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 04:11 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. In which case, I think of the man who wanted the war, who manipulated to get the war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 04:41 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. We'll never know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 09:00 AM Response to Reply #13 |
28. That isn't the point. We all know what bush is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 04:03 PM Response to Reply #13 |
38. Are you saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 08:57 AM Response to Reply #11 |
25. of course you are entitled to that, but for me this was a BIG DEAL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 08:43 AM Response to Reply #9 |
22. There are enough DEMOCRATS both in and out of Congress who voted against it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 01:44 PM Response to Reply #22 |
34. The IWR did not 'authorize' the preemptive, unilateral invasion of Iraq. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 01:52 PM Response to Reply #9 |
36. Well Said, Mr. Tree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 07:05 AM Response to Original message |
16. Zzzzzzzzzzz... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 08:57 AM Response to Reply #16 |
26. funny that you would waste your time even commenting if you were so bored |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 07:09 AM Response to Original message |
17. Al Gore will solve your problem before he's even elected! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 09:01 AM Response to Reply #17 |
29. He is an excellent choice. Before the Iraq war he was against the invasion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 08:04 AM Response to Original message |
18. They can't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 08:43 AM Response to Original message |
21. I agree with that statement 100 per cent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coventina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 08:57 AM Response to Original message |
27. I agree completely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mnmoderatedem (599 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 09:13 AM Response to Original message |
30. What was the overall tally of Dem votes in Congress? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
31. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mnmoderatedem (599 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 10:18 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. for what it's worth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithy Cherub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 01:48 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. Correction. Obama spoke against the Iraq debacle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
37. Like their failure to reject the unlawful Florida electors on Jan 6th, 2001. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-07-06 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
39. Agreed. They abdicated their Constitutional duty to decide matters of war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 02:30 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC