|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Toots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-06-06 09:06 AM Original message |
Should the USA have a presence in the Mid East? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-06-06 09:07 AM Response to Original message |
1. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-06-06 09:08 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. It is not a case of their survival but ours... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-06-06 09:21 AM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Our problem tends to be though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wuushew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-06-06 09:54 AM Response to Reply #2 |
11. This country could survive on synthetic oil like the Germans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-06-06 09:56 AM Response to Reply #2 |
12. No nation in the Middle East could ever pose a threat to the U.S. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-06-06 09:13 AM Response to Original message |
3. Deleted message |
Toots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-06-06 09:22 AM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Imagine America having to do with 30% less oil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-06-06 09:58 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. You assume wrongly that not occupying Middle East nations means no oil. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-06-06 09:17 AM Response to Original message |
4. No and we need to make it a national priority to make this so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-06-06 09:19 AM Response to Original message |
5. Sovereign nations mean just that. Sovereign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-06-06 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
6. We shouldn't have a "presence" anywhere but our own country... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-06-06 10:04 AM Response to Reply #6 |
14. very well said- I agree, our 'needs' do not justify our deeds- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theophilus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-06-06 09:21 AM Response to Original message |
7. We probably should keep all of our troops in Israel. We could keep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
independentpiney (966 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-06-06 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
10. No, there's no reason for overseas military presence anywhere. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 08th 2024, 06:23 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC