|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 09:29 AM Original message |
Wouldn't the talk of impeachment now be conviction before trial? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 09:30 AM Response to Original message |
1. Impeachment always comes before the trial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 09:37 AM Response to Reply #1 |
7. You are technically correct, an impeachment is like an indictment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
2. IMPEACHMENT is the equivalent of indictment, or bringing charges. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 09:37 AM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Coke! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 09:38 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. LOL... Is that like jinx? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 11:37 AM Response to Reply #11 |
28. Yes, but he doesn' have it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 12:39 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. Curses, foiled again! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
3. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
4. No, it wouldn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
5. No. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
6. The impeachment process is not a criminal procedure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 09:42 AM Response to Reply #6 |
13. I understand now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NotGivingUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 09:48 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. i'll second that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 09:59 AM Response to Reply #13 |
19. I so want to believe in Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy, and the Easter Bunny, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 10:23 AM Response to Reply #19 |
23. So did Santa Claus bring you the crystal ball you're using? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 11:07 AM Response to Reply #19 |
26. Who is this poster called "Ignored" that responded to reply #19? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 11:22 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Wow, someone's afraid of my opinion enough to "ignore" me?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 09:38 AM Response to Original message |
9. Well, if no one talks about it, there won't even be an investigation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Road Scholar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 09:38 AM Response to Original message |
10. Another question; Can censure be applied outright while |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 09:41 AM Response to Original message |
12. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 09:48 AM Response to Reply #12 |
15. I promise I won't buy any of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
14. It would appear that you do not understand the concept or the process. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 09:51 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. I agree I didn't but I do now, thanks to all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 10:25 AM Response to Reply #17 |
24. Yup, investigations are part of the IMPEACHMENT process. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
18. Impeachment is not justice, only removal from office. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
20. Impeachment is the trial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 07:59 PM Response to Reply #20 |
32. Impeachment is not the trial. The House impeaches, the Senate holds the trial. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magnolia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
21. It depends on who does the "talking". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 10:09 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Nancy and Harry have assured us they are going to do both |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 10:26 AM Response to Reply #21 |
25. Exactly. THEY can't talk about it, which is all the more reason... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
29. No. - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-01-06 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
30. Impeachment is one thing. Criminal trial for war crimes/crimes another |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-02-06 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
33. "If the impeachment provision in the Constitution. . ." --Barbara Jordan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 11:38 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC