So the Iraq Study Group, which contains no Iraqis, is going to recommend a withdrawal, which will be ignored by the military geniuses in the White House and Pentagon. Meanwhile, the governments in the regions are proceeding with their own plans to solve their own problems without the "help" from the ISG or the other brilliant planners who created the mess.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061130/ap_on_go_ot/us_iraq_44WASHINGTON - A leader of a bipartisan commission on U.S. options in
Iraq said the group has agreed on a set of recommendations due next week, and published reports said the panel will urge a major withdrawal of U.S. forces but set no firm deadlines. Such a withdrawal would gradually shift the U.S. military role from combat to support, a shift in policy for the Bush administration that
President Bush seemed to reject Thursday, days ahead of the report's release.
"This business about a graceful exit just simply has no realism to it at all," he said Thursday at a news conference in Jordan with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki by his side.
The New York Times and The Washington Post reported Thursday that the much-anticipated report from the congressionally chartered Iraq Study Group will recommend far more aggressive diplomacy to enlist other nations in helping to curb violence in Iraq. That outreach could include a regional conference among all of Iraq's neighbors, or a wider gathering of Middle East nations that would also address separate Middle East peace issues.
The Times reported that the study group will recommend direct, high-level American diplomacy with U.S. adversaries
Iran and Syria, a path that the administration has also rejected so far.
Defense officials, meanwhile, said the Pentagon is developing plans to send four more battalions to Iraq early next year. The extra combat engineer units of Army reserves would total about 3,500 troops and would come from around the United States, said officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because the deployments have not been announced.