Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why do we even bother having an EPA?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 08:21 PM
Original message
Why do we even bother having an EPA?
how rich is this? if i intentionally apply a pollutant it isn't a pollutant.so, if i intentionally fire a bullet, is it not a bullet? if janet jackson had intentionally shown her nipple at the super bowl would it not have been a nipple? butter my ass and call me a biscuit. and this is just one of the EPAs recent moves for us, the reglar folk. see another thread i posted earlier here
--###--


original

Posted on Tue, Nov. 28, 2006

EPA allows spraying pesticide over waters

MICHAEL DOYLE
McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON - The Bush administration pleased farmers and frustrated environmentalists Monday by declaring that pesticides can be sprayed into and over waters without first obtaining special permits.

The heavily lobbied decision is supposed to settle a dispute that's roiled federal courts and divided state regulators. It's popular among those who spray pesticides for a living, but it worries those who fear poisoned waters will result.

"We need to act fast to stop mosquitoes when they are found," argued Jim Tassano, a pest-control operator in the California foothills town of Sonora. "Any delay results in adults emerging. It is far cheaper and much more effective to kill them as larvae . . . (and) if a permit is required, the costs would skyrocket."

The EPA decision gave the pest operators what they wanted. It also closely parsed the English language for what the all-important word "pollutant" means.

EPA officials concluded that a pesticide, when it's deliberately applied, isn't a "pollutant" under the terms of the 1972 Clean Water Act. Consequently, after considering nearly 700 public comments, officials ruled that federal "discharge" permits aren't necessary when using pesticides to control waterborne pests.
~snip~
.
.
.
complete article here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. We absolutely need the EPA, we just can't afford to let a Republican appoint
the director.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Another James Watt Dominion we don't need.
Edited on Wed Nov-29-06 08:36 PM by orpupilofnature57
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlamoDemoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. YES! keep ghosts like Christine Whitman off the EPA payroll
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kutjara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's just priceless.
I'll remember that if a cop stops me for littering. "Oh no officer, I didn't throw that bag of McDonalds wrappers on the street. I placed it there intentionally. So you see, it's not litter, it's art."

Actually, the gov't could save a fortune in rebranding costs if they just changed the name of the EPA to the "Environmental Prevention Agency." That, at least, would be the truth.

Will noone rid us of this turbulent Administration?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. They put that word Impeachment to bed, to promote Continuity
thats Enabling shrub, yet again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC