Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Newsweek: the last neocon standing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 01:49 AM
Original message
Newsweek: the last neocon standing
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15896208/site/newsweek/

The Last Man Standing

With the neocons in disarray, Elliott Abrams may be their best hope for keeping President Bush onboard.

Dec. 4, 2006 issue - It's been a rough season for neoconservatives, the group that has dominated U.S. foreign policy since the attacks of September 11. They've been largely run out of the Bush administration, beset by infighting, and mocked by a foreign-policy establishment that hailed their power just a few years ago. Last month was particularly brutal. They looked on helplessly as Democrats took both houses of Congress. They had to grit their teeth when President Bush met with Washington dealmakers James Baker and Lee Hamilton, whose bipartisan group is charged with extricating America from the mess the neocon-influenced policy created in Iraq. Then, insult to injury: they watched their cold-war nemesis in Central America circa 1986, Daniel Ortega, rise again to be president of Nicaragua.

The neocons are reeling, but they're not dead yet. A few stalwarts are digging in their wing-tips. And there's already a small backlash against the backlash. At the State Department, supposedly the bastion of realism, some officials are sounding defiant. "There are a lot of people throughout the ranks who believe in the democracy agenda," says one senior official who would only discuss policy issues anonymously. "If the result of the Baker report is that we have to make any deal necessary ... to get out of Iraq, I don't think that's going to fly." Their hopes, and the hopes of neocons everywhere, may rest on the shoulders of Elliott Abrams, the number-two official at the National Security Council—who remains in charge of promoting democracy in the Middle East, a linchpin of the neocon agenda.

Abrams, who declined an interview request from NEWSWEEK, has his work cut out for him. A Harvard-trained lawyer, Abrams handles the Middle East, though not Iraq. Earlier this year, Abrams pushed for an $85 million expansion of TV and radio programming beamed into Iran to gently promote regime change. Now, toppling the mullahs might be off the table. The same goes for the policy of pushing reforms on Arab allies like Egypt's Hosni Mubarak, who has kept a key opposition figure in jail for more than 11 months and scaled back rights. Michael Gerson, who served until recently as Bush's speechwriter (and who is now a NEWSWEEK contributor), says Abrams must be troubled by the swing. "People who support the democracy agenda are deeply concerned that Mubarak is significantly backtracking," Gerson says. And Abrams has to cope with the fallout of his push for Palestinian elections—the rise of Hamas, and the breakdown of the peace process. But Abrams has one powerful advantage. "Bush has enormous regard for him," says a senior administration official who would not speak about their relationship on the record. "One, because he knows Elliott is keeper of the flame. And also, he's the only one who doesn't draw any attention to himself." (Abrams has been somewhat press-shy ever since he admitted to withholding information from Congress about the Iran-contra affair two decades ago; he was later pardoned.)

The biggest dogfight is still ahead: whether to cut a deal with regimes like Iran, North Korea and Syria. Bush's approach has been to counter threats from oppressive regimes by trying to change them. Bill Kristol, editor of the Weekly Standard and the punditocracy's best-known neocon, says it's hard to imagine the president turning his back on all that. "I think Bush is the last neocon in power," he says. "The truth is, it was always Bush."

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Elliott Abrams, .. —who remains in charge of promoting democracy in the Middle East"
Ah ..... no wonder its WAR WAR WAR all the time .... Elliot's in charge ....

There arent enough dead yet ... Democracy cannot be acheived with so few dead ....

The word 'peace' has been excised from ALL the dictionaries at the White House ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. don't forget Karen Hughes
te he
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. The U.S. is ready to throw the neocons out
Bush should be impeached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reformedrepub Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yeah good luck
with that "Our Speaker" Nancy has already said impeachment is "off the table"....what a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. And we have never known a politician to say something and do something else?
Politicians are like fishermen, the truth is just not in them....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. See? If we'd hanged him for Iran-Contra........but nooooooooooo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. Great site on the neocons.... with pictures!
FYI:


Edwin Meese III

Attorney General (Reagan)

Heritage Foundation - The Federalist Society

http://www.eurolegal.org/neocons/usneocon.htm


Even if they are pushed out of the war, they are entrenched in the courts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
7. I am sick of the country bleed dry to keep Bush looking good.
It is just not going to work and I am not the only one who thinks like this. Turning over our men, army, and the rest of this country is not going to make a dead fish smell any better so why waste our blood and goods on this one day longer? Cut Bush out and now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewenotdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. Abrams is actually a Jewish separatist
For some odd reason, the appropriateness of his views are questioned neither by the Administation nor by the American press. Go figure.

>>>In one of the many oddities of the Christian Right-neoconservative alliance that bolsters the Republican Party and forms a backbone of the George W. Bush administration, many neoconservative government officials are radical separatists, indeed segregationists. As Abrams, who argues against Jews dating or attending elementary schools with non-Jews, put it in his book Faith or Fear: How Jews Can Survive in a Christian America: “Outside the land of Israel, there can be no doubt that Jews, faithful to the covenant between God and Abraham, are to stand apart from the nation in which they live. It is the very nature of being Jewish to be apart—except in Israel—from the rest of the population” (Free Press, 1997). Judaism, according to Abrams, demands “apartness”—not in the sense of confining oneself to a physical ghetto, but all necessary measures should be taken to prevent “prolonged and intimate exposure to non-Jewish culture.” Abrams takes care to insist that his positions imply no “disloyalty” to the United States, but at the same times insists that Jews must be loyal to Israel because they “are in a permanent covenant with God and with the land of Israel and its people. Their commitment will not weaken if the Israeli government pursues unpopular policies.”<<<

http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/969
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC