Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did any foreign country intervene in any way in the US Civil War?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
wholetruth00 Donating Member (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:12 AM
Original message
Did any foreign country intervene in any way in the US Civil War?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. You mean like with the death squads like we are training in Iraq?
I don't think so.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think so but
at that time it probably had to do with cotton and wheat rather than oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmosh42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. I believe there was something about England..
Edited on Sun Nov-12-06 11:30 AM by dmosh42
England was trading for cotton and other 'southern' merchandise. Supposedly they were going to finance some of the confederate debt, until the union forces managed to blockade many ports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. We very nearly went to war with England
Early on a Sunday, so my recollection is a bit hazy, but there was plenty of diplomatic wrangling between England and the U.S. over a variety of issues. One of them involved Southern ships being armed in Britain to be used against the Northern blockade. One ship (I forget the name) would have been a severe danger to the blockade and Lincoln's government threatened war during the diplomatic crisis.

(It may be useful to note, Secretary of State Seward actually thought a war with England would reunite the country in the fervor against a common enemy).

England was very much prepared to twist the knife in the American Republic's back, which is why many historians surmise the Emancipation Proclamation was timed just so. By making the issue of the war slavery, England was neatly removed (Britain couldn't morally countenance fighting on the side of slavers when they themselves had abolished the practice, even though they desperately wanted to recognize the South as an independent nation).

That did not stop, however, some in the British navy from becoming veritable pirates in the Francis Drake tradition. Another diplomatic crisis broke out when a Confederate sought refuge on a British ship, and the Union boarded it to remove him.

England was very much involved, and the Lincoln administration had to do a very complicated dance to keep them from becoming overt allies of the South. Lincoln was wise enough to know war with England would certainly be the end of the nation, though many in his Cabinet were advocating it at the time.

It's not much studied, but Lincoln's foreign policy during the Civil War is a fascinating read if you can find a few books on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. England supported the South
cotton supplies and all that

until the North imposed a blockade
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. The blockade did not stop Britain
The American government was convinced that the British navy could sweep the blockade aside easily, if they chose to.

Lincoln's government was able to help arrange other suppliers of cotton for England's mills -- mainly Egyptian cotton, I think. That eliminated the pressure the mill owners were putting on the British government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurking Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Britain and France
both came very close to entering the war (for the South). Their refusal to abandon slavery sealed the South's fate, however. I think if the Confederacy had been willing to give up slavery, both of them would have come to her aid.

Some 50,000 Brit volunteers joined forces on both sides in the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. true
I posted the shorthand version
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC