Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republican Majority for Choice Opposes Judge Alito for Supreme Court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Dixie Flatline Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 02:39 PM
Original message
Republican Majority for Choice Opposes Judge Alito for Supreme Court
RMC Opposes Judge Alito for Supreme Court
http://www.gopchoice.org/index.asp

The Republican Majority for Choice (RMC) regrettably announces its opposition to the nomination of Judge Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court.

RMC is an organization whose core mission is to protect the right to choose as outlined in Roe v. Wade and to represent the millions of Republicans who strongly support this right. After much research and analysis of Mr. Alito’s own record and statements on this issue of individual freedom it is clear that he is an advocate for further restricting this right.

Judge Alito seems by all measures to be an experienced and capable jurist, but one who is out of step with mainstream Americans on the issue of abortion and maintaining the legal right to choose.

There is no crystal ball to predict how a Justice Alito would rule in future cases; therefore we have closely monitored the confirmation hearings with the hope that Judge Alito would offer some clarifying statements that would allay our concerns about his record. Instead, he side-stepped the issue of whether or not the right to privacy in the Constitution extends to reproductive choice. He avoided answering whether Roe was settled law and existing precedent required a health exception to statutes limiting a woman’s access to abortion.

Without such assurances, we can only calculate his judicial philosophy on reproductive rights through the prism of his past actions and statements. As the replacement for the architect of the “undue burden” standard, the stakes are too high for RMC to support an appointee who outlined a blueprint to dismantle that very standard.

The reality is that Judge Alito would not have to vote to overrule Roe in order to be the architect of the denial of a woman's right to choose. He could give lip service to respecting Roe while upholding the numerous legislative efforts to chip away at reproductive freedom. The cumulative result is that Roe v. Wade and its progeny are rendered meaningless.

But Judge Alito’s position on choice, however, is not the only disappointment surrounding his nomination. The selection of Judge Alito sends a very clear message from the Bush Administration and the Republican leadership in Congress that they are willing to continue steering the party into a marginalized corner that puts it at odds with most voters.

Sadly, we have come to a point at which average Republicans are beginning to abandon the GOP policy and candidates. We have seen this in the public outcry concerning President Bush’s opposition to stem cell research; we saw it last November in the Virginia gubernatorial race, and we will see it again this year if Republican candidates continue to promote extremist views. We pledge to continue our mission to promote common sense solutions to help lessen the incidence of abortion while ensuring that women and families maintain the safe and legal right to choose. We will no longer stand by while women’s rights are used as a political soapbox for either party.

Members of RMC:

Senator Lincoln Chafee (RI)
Senator Susan Collins (ME)
Senator Olympia Snowe (ME)
Senator Arlen Specter (PA)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is that for real, or is it propoganda? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. The links are obnoxious, but they are RNC
So are their members going to be calling their Senators?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. I hope this will help..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. So does this mean they will vote against Alito?
That sure would be an interesting turn of events!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why has this received no attention?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Let's hope this group can put enough pressure on them to
get their attention. Once the extremists are removed, it's groups like this that will be left OR it's groups like this that will join the dems in the future.

Thanks for the news Dixie Flatline, and Welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. So, are those four senators voting NO?
I'll retire to Bedlam....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. That press release is from the 11th, and Collins came out for Alito
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. If they're for choice, then why..
.. aren't these four senators joining the filibuster????

Senator Lincoln Chafee (RI)
Senator Susan Collins (ME)
Senator Olympia Snowe (ME)
Senator Arlen Specter (PA)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. Chaffee and Snowe haven't announced yet, but
Collins and Spector have. Think they'll get kicked out? :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sundancekid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. if these are "no" votes on confirmation, does it mean the repukes
will have an even harder time getting their 60 votes for cloture??? the R count would go to 51 plus our Dem Defectors 3 (Byrd, Tim Johnson, Ben Nelson) = 54 votes on the nomination itself ... I think that Snowe has been heard saying she still wants an up-or-down vote meaning "yes" on cloture ... oh, the math! it sure can seem both hopeful and fuzzy!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. Why do they "regrettably" announce?
Edited on Sun Jan-29-06 03:12 PM by Straight Shooter
This is a position to be proud of, to stand against george w. bush's agenda of suppression of women and their right to determine what they can and cannot do with their bodies and their future.

It sends a signal loud and clear to America, that Repubs and Dems can stand on common ground to protect the rights of its citizens.

Four more numbers to call, to thank them for their position, to urge them to join in voting no and a filibuster. Saying you regret something and then voting for it, that won't do. I hope this isn't a false smokescreen.

edit: I just reviewed the site and see where I made my mistake. The Senators are listed as members of the RMC, but there is as yet no endorsement of this letter. Damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. Oh My Fat Glutes! ..... WOW ..... Might be a few Republicans
practicing abstinance tomorrow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. Welcome to DU dixie flatline and thanks for the lucious gift!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. Welcome to DU! You get a recommend for this one!
Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. Dixie, I'm sure that it wasn't on purpose
but your post makes it look almost like those names at the bottom represent the signatures of those four people. Those 4 names aren't on the actual article that you linked to. Also, the article is dated January 11 and, if I'm not mistaken, at least some of them have stated that they're voting for confirmation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. We need to contact those four
and ask them to vote against a rules change if Frist decides to go nuclear. See my thread (linked to below) for some ideas about contacting Republicans.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2383579


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Innocent Smith Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
18. Old news - two weeks old
That statement is two weeks old and didn't stop Specter from being Alito's buddy during the hearings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC