|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
eggman67 (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 04:04 PM Original message |
In the interests of clarity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
1. Why can't a filibuster prevent a Tuesday confirmation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 04:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. As I see it, the repukes already have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eggman67 (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 04:16 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. What I'm saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
electropop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 05:41 PM Response to Reply #6 |
40. The nukular option will drop major fallout on the rethugs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 04:10 PM Original message |
my question too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eggman67 (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 04:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Because 5 minutes later |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 04:12 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Not true... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eggman67 (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 04:18 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. I have no doubt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 04:31 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. You got to have faith eggman... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eggman67 (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 04:53 PM Response to Reply #13 |
23. I'd like to friend, I would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 04:13 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. I don't think the Senate would, let alone can, work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eggman67 (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 04:19 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. It's my understanding that the vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemInDistress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
9. YOU SOUND LIKE A DEFEATIST... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eggman67 (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 04:22 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Did you bother to read the post? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
11. We're closer than you think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eggman67 (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 04:30 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Upperdown?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 04:36 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. May already have Chaffee and Snowe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eggman67 (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 04:42 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Actually you'd need 4 more Republicans with Chafee & Snowe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 04:55 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Psychological Strategy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eggman67 (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 05:06 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. Well we'll see on Tuesday and I hope youre right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 05:11 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. I find negative threads useless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eggman67 (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 05:19 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. I don't see it as negative to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 05:35 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. Well I must have missed it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eggman67 (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 05:57 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. Just for the record |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 06:00 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. The rest of your post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eggman67 (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 06:06 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. What? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemInDistress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
14. read it twice now,,,, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eggman67 (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 04:35 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. You apparently stopped reading too soon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemInDistress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 04:40 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. GOOD THING YOUR NOT A DEMOCRATIC SENATOR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eggman67 (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 04:43 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. What don't YOU understand about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemInDistress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 04:53 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. SNIFF SNIFF...I SMELL A PROGRESSIVE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eggman67 (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 04:55 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Because it's none of you're business |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemInDistress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 05:01 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. I KNEW IT.....EOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sal Minella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 05:14 PM Response to Reply #26 |
32. You should have known it from the spelling. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eggman67 (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 05:20 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Spelling? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
15. Because that's what the Republicans want people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eggman67 (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 04:37 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. I'm convinced they will do it, and frankly I'd like to see them forced to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justitia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
27. I'm not sure if the repubs would go nuclear or not, but I wouldn't........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eggman67 (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 05:13 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. Couldn't agree more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justitia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 05:26 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. We had extensive discussions on here on post-nuclear proceedings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cats Against Frist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 05:59 PM Response to Reply #27 |
44. I wish I could nominate your post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
28. Bullshit. Defeatism is its own reward. You've counted the votes already? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemInDistress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 05:29 PM Response to Reply #28 |
36. thanks omega...this person already gave the job to alito |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 05:41 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Kerry told Senators NOW is the time. There IS NO Later! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemInDistress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 05:52 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. YOU ARE SO COOL..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 06:14 PM Response to Reply #41 |
51. If it weren't in play, MSM wouldn't be trying SO HARD to say it isn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eggman67 (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 05:33 PM Response to Reply #28 |
37. Essentially yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Czolgosz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
42. You make two underlying assumptions that are not necessarily correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eggman67 (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 06:00 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. No I think you CAN get 41 votes to preclude cloture. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Czolgosz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 06:04 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. What authority makes you believe this? How else do you also suppose Frist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eggman67 (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 06:09 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. How it works |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 06:12 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. Forget the nuclear option, it's not germane to this effort. Thanks. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Czolgosz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 07:16 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. I think this effort is independent of the nuclear option, but if we win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Czolgosz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-28-06 07:03 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. The American Constitutional Society has some more detailed analysis: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 07:58 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC