Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When Dems. had Congress and the WH (1993-4), what did they accomplish?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 04:26 PM
Original message
When Dems. had Congress and the WH (1993-4), what did they accomplish?
Just wanting a quick review - after Clinton was first inaugurated, and before the GOP takeover of Congress (in the Nov. 1994 elections), what exactly did the Democrats accomplish? I remember Bill and Hillary tried to get a national health care plan through, but it was beaten down. Can we please list what was achieved during that time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. My favorite is the Family & Medical Leave Act.
Edited on Mon Nov-06-06 04:28 PM by redqueen
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. NAFTA
Edited on Mon Nov-06-06 04:30 PM by WI_DEM
on a more postive note the economic recovery bill which led to millions of new jobs and balanced the budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thank you for your concern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gfnrob Donating Member (551 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. 93-2000
Surplus SUrplus SURplus SURPlus SURPLus SURPLUs SURPLUS!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bubba Zanetti Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. gun control
which laid the foundation for the repugs to take over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. Brady Bill
They also reversed much of the damage the Republicans had done to environmental laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bubba Zanetti Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. (meant to reply to this post) Gun Control
which laid the foundation for the repugs to take over. Where I hail, gun control single handedly creates more repugs than any other issue.

Let's not go there again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. You got that right.
Gun Control, which laid the foundation for the repugs to take over. Where I hail, gun control single handedly creates more repugs than any other issue.

Let's not go there again.

You got that right.

IMO, the 1994 Feinstein Ban was the single greatest factor behind the loss of the House and Senate in the '90s, and cost Gore the presidency in '00 via the loss of TN and WV (and don't think the Feinstein Ban wasn't in play in pro-gun Florida, either).

The ban-more-guns agenda the DLC pushed in the early '90s through '04 was an unmitigated disaster. I agree, let's not go there again.

Dems and the Gun Issue - Now What?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Not much really
One of the first things that kind of got things off on the wrong foot was the gays in the military issue. Democrats did not want to touch the issue. It was a hot potato so to speak. Clinton pushed for removing the ban but had to settle for "don't ask, don't tell" Then came along National Health Care. Clinton was just sure it would fly right through Congress but the GOP really put up a fight and ran numerous commercials against it. The Harry and Louise ads really hurt. The Democrats were running scared and would not back Clinton. IMO that is the number one reason they were all thrown out on their butts in '94. They would not come together and pass legislation that would really benefit America. I hope they have learned that they are there only at the behest of the people and if they don't work for the good they can (and will) be removed. I am hoping this election will be every bit as much about accountability...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. Balanced the budget for the first time in 40 yrs!!! -eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greeneyedboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. it's the economy, stupid. not perfect, but compared to now, heaven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yes it was good, but not being shared well - most of the money still going to
the top, even then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Sky Boy Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. Don't Ask Don't Tell
Passed in 1993. Was supposed to be a compromise.

Clinton promised during the campaign that he would sign an executive order allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly in the military. When he actually started talking about doing just that (after a little pressure from some activist groups), his joint chiefs (including Colin Powell) threw a little hissy fit and threatened to resign if he followed through.

The most bitter pill to swallow was Senator Sam Nunn (D-GA). With presidential aspirations of his own and rumored to be a bit sour about the fact that he wasn't tapped for Secretary of Defense, he took it upon himself to humiliate the new president, threatening to introduce legislation to make any such executive order illegal.

I do not like Republicans, but I do admire their party discipline. That never would have happened to a Republican president.

The resulting "Don't Ask Don't Tell" compromise was a disaster. It basically codified what was already in effect and killed a lot of cases that were winding their way through the courts that might have actually repealed the old policy. After "Don't Ask Don't Tell," the military was able to wiggle out of most of the unconstitutional rulings by saying, "Oh, you're right. That 'OLD' policy was really unfair. But we have a 'NEW' policy now, so this case just doesn't apply."

It paved the way for DOMA and a host of other anti-gay measures that conservatives love to use to whip their base up to go to the polls.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
14. your point????? on election day to oust the most corrupt repug
adm??? as fbi are sending people in undercover like never before?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
15. Raised taxes on the wealthiest
To help control the deficits. The budget passed without 1 vote from a Republic... and the economy & stock market took off after the budget went into effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC