Please rate up this Yahoo news story about the nuclear secrets on the web.

[drm604]

It's open to everybody and doesn't require registration like the NYT.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20061103/tc_afp/usiraqnuclearinternet_061103120200

[annabanana]

1. done. . . .k&r . . . n/t

[april]

2. done!

[aquart]

3. Done.

[Dhalgren]

4. Done. K&R.

This is more than just stupid, it's...it's...something else, but "what" I don't know...

[yodermon]

5. done, only 37 votes so far, k&r

[drm604]

6. This needs one more recommendation. n/t

[Crankie Avalon]

7. OK. n/t

[drm604]

8. Thanks. n/t

[sqarebis]

9. Done!

.

[jhain]

10. Done -with a Flourish n/t

[Kerrytravelers]

11. DUne.

[qnr]

12. Done.. Though I'm curious about the no registration comment, since it requested that

I log in.

[drm604]

13. Yahoo does require you to log in to recommend a story.

However, anyone can READ it without registering or logging in. That's what's important.

[qnr]

14. Right, however, I only brought it up due to the "Rate this up" request

:hi: nothing significant, just mentioning it.

[drm604]

15. My point was to get a story that everyone could easily read onto the front page of Yahoo. n/t

[WeHoldTheseTruths]

16. Click on the right side of the star

for a rating of 5, on left side of same star for raating of 4.5.

[WeHoldTheseTruths]

17. oops

maybe that applies elswhere. sorry.

[sandnsea]

18. "pre-1991 nuclear research"

This is the story to use any time you want to refer to it. It totally destroys the ridiculous claim that this proves we should have went to war with Iraq. These nuclear papers have absolutely nothing to do with anything going on in 2003.