Bev Harris on MSNBC right now

[texasleo]

:wow:

[Coexist]

1. you mean "she who shall not be named" don't you?! n/t

[JuniperLea]

2. How is it she has any credibility at all? n/t

[Bunny]

See me in hell, Bev.

You douchebag.

[Poll_Blind]

5. I'm not familiar with your posts, Bunny, but I already like you. 8^)

:toast:

  I used to have no idea about the whole BH thing and I was watching DUers getting into lots of scraps about it. So I did some research in old threads and found out what's going on. I also remember listening to Randi Rhodes over the course of two days: The first when Randi was doing her best to raise money for BH and the second when she realized she'd been screwed by same. Also the Olberman thing...it goes on and on.

Cheers!

PB

[Bunny]

8. I like you, too Poll_Blind!

To us! :toast:

[survivor999]

3. Thought she was in jail....

[texasleo]

4. *shrugs*

[tenshi816]

6. Isn't Bev on about 14:45 of her 15 minutes of fame?

I'm still embarrassed that I once donated money to her.

[TahitiNut]

7. She'd rather hear the sound of her own voice than answer clearly.

That syndrome annoys the shit out of me. (Excuse me. Wiping. Back.)

The answer is clear, imho. A paper ballot is absolutely necessary under ANY condition. For those jurisdictions that want the 'speed' of some computerized tally, optical scan is sufficient but the paper ballots must be manually audited to give strong (98% confidence) assurance that the computerized tally has no material miscounts. Where the manual audit does not give that assurance, a FULL manual recount MUST be automatic before the election can be certified. When the manual count shows a material difference, the Attorney General MUST investigate for fraud, based on a prima facie presumption of fraud.