Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Taken from Bill Maher's New Rules October 20, 2006

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bif Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:31 AM
Original message
Taken from Bill Maher's New Rules October 20, 2006

And finally, New Rule, in two parts: A) You can't call yourself a think tank if all your ideas are stupid. And B), if you're someone from one of the think tanks that dreamed up the Iraq War, and who predicted that we'd be greeted as liberators, and that we wouldn't need a lot of troops, and that Iraqi oil would pay for the war, that the WMD's would be found, that the looting wasn't problematic, and the mission was accomplished, that the insurgency was in its last throes, that things would get better after the people voted, after the government was formed, after we got Saddam, after we got his kids, after we got Zarqawi, and that the whole bloody mess wouldn't turn into a civil war...you have to stop making predictions!

You know, there's a name for people who are always wrong about everything all the time: husbands. You know, it's a shame what happened to think tanks. They used to produce valuable, apolitical analysis. But partisanship crept into many of them. And the Bush Administration doesn't just come up with something as stupid as "If we leave now, they'll follow us home." No, they have someone from a think tank say it first. It's a way to lend respectability. The same reason a titty bar has food. I hear.

The think tanks that incubated the Iraq war have lofty names like the Heritage Foundation and the Project for a New American Century. Whatever. They've been wrong so often, I'm surprised they're not my broker. Richard Perle thought we could win Iraq with 40,000 troops. Paul Wolfowitz predicted, in 2003, that within a year, the grateful people of Baghdad would name some grand square in their fine city after President Bush. And he was right when he said they'd be waving American flags. They were on fire.

William Kristol pooh-poohed the fears that Sunnis and Shiites would be at each others' throats, as "the stuff of pop psychology." Right. And having your head chopped off is just a quick way to drop 11 pounds. Kristol, of course, is revered by much of the right because he was Dan Quayle's chief of staff, and was known as "Quayle's Brain." You know that. Which sounded impressive until I remembered Dan Quayle didn't have a brain.

And now, Mr. Kristol proposes immediate military action against Iran, predicting the Iranians will thank us for it. Hey, you know what, Nostrodamus? Why don't you sit this one out?

We'll get by using the Magic Eight Ball for a while. Because you guys have been so wrong about so much for so long, people are actually turning to the Democrats. So, we can say Iraq was a noble experiment, if that helps you. Our intention was good: to penetrate Iraq and bring it to a glorious, euphoric climax. But it's clear now that's just not going to happen. And yet we're still pounding away.

Causing the whole area to become painfully inflamed. And in that situation, the kindest thing you can do is...just pull out.
 

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpreadItAround Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. That was one of his best rants ever...here's the YouTube link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. When that guy is good, he is really, really good. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Wow, that's for sure...
Edited on Thu Oct-26-06 09:53 AM by Surya Gayatri
when he hits it right, he hits it over the left-field bleachers. Amazing material--I wonder if he does the writing himself or if he has a team. SG

edit: typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bif Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. My guess is both
He probably works with a team of writers. I'm sure he has a lot of input and makes changes to the script.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. it was the best hour of TV in years, Barney Frank was spot on
and he had David Kuo and Richardson (by satellite). Frank would not let the conservative from the WSJ get away with chaning the subject.

And yes, this rant was spot on.

(I TiVoed the show and can't stop watching it. I would only add that Maher was on Scarborough for a two part interview this week. It was interesting that for the second part, Maher was on late in the show and was the teaser throughout so it seems someone knew people were watching for Bill. Anyway, the second half of the interview was not so great. Maher argued Bush should be impeached for the 7 minutes and Scarborough (rightly) destroyed him on it. It was like Bill got mad about that one thing and couldn't change his line of attack.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. Bill has a way with words doesn't he??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC