Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ed Buckham - DeLay's chief of staff WHILE organizing US Family Network

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 12:50 PM
Original message
Ed Buckham - DeLay's chief of staff WHILE organizing US Family Network
When I read the WaPo article yesterday, per the shady funding and functioning per US Family Network and ties to DeLay - I was bothered by the timing of a) the founding of the organization; b) the departure of Buckham from DeLay's office. Note the italicized font indicates my commentary/thoughts interspersed with clips from the article.

link to main article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/30/AR2005123001480_pf.html

Key snips:
The U.S. Family Network, a public advocacy group that operated in the 1990s with close ties to Rep. Tom DeLay and claimed to be a nationwide grass-roots organization, was funded almost entirely by corporations linked to embattled lobbyist Jack Abramoff, according to tax records and former associates of the group

During its five-year existence, the U.S. Family Network raised $2.5 million but kept its donor list secret.

Two former associates of Edwin A. Buckham, the congressman's former chief of staff and the organizer of the U.S. Family Network, said Buckham told them the funds came from Russian oil and gas executives.

So far we see that the organization had a five year life span, and that it was organized (that is: founded) by Buckham, and that sources within (as the article details later) suggest that $ was taken (solicited, it would be suggested) from shady Russian oil and gas execs. Go back into that time frame, and I believe there was a great deal of press suggesting that the Russian mob was very involved in emerging, de-nationalized, oil and gas industries in Russia. Back to the timing per Buckham:

---
After the group was formed in 1996, its director told the Internal Revenue Service that its goal was to advocate policies favorable for "economic growth and prosperity, social improvement, moral fitness, and the general well-being of the United States."


Now watch the timing of the trips and money and results per Russia oil interests - and what can be gathered per the timing of when Buckham was still Chief of Staff to DeLay, vs. when he was a "lobbyist" (that is, when he officially left to start Alexander Strategy Group.)

---
Nine months before the June 25, 1998, payment of $1 million by the London law firm James & Sarch Co., as recorded in the tax forms, Buckham and DeLay were the dinner guests in Moscow of Marina Nevskaya and Alexander Koulakovsky of the oil firm Naftasib, which in promotional literature counted as its principal clients the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Interior.

------------snip---- (later in the article)

Buckham's trip with DeLay was his second to Moscow that year for meetings with Nevskaya and Koulakovsky; on the earlier one, the DeLay aide attracted media attention by returning through Paris aboard the Concorde, a $5,500 flight.

From this we see that at least on the first trip Buckham was still the Chief of Staff. Earlier in the article DeLay's folks claim that the trip by DeLay was about religious interests. Hardly worth multiple trips - and a huge check for the young U.S. Family network were that the truth. Let's keep watching/reading:

-----snip--- (later in the article)

During the DeLays' visit on Aug. 5 to 11, 1997, the congressman met with Nevskaya and was escorted around Moscow by Koulakovsky, Naftasib's general manager. DeLay told the House clerk that the trip's sponsor was the National Center for Public Policy Research, but multiple sources told The Post that his expenses were indirectly reimbursed by the Russian-connected Bahamian company.

----snip--- (later in the article)

Two former Buckham associates said that he told them years ago not only that the $1 million donation was solicited from Russian oil and gas executives, but also that the initial plan was for the donation to be made via a delivery of cash to be picked up at a Washington area airport.

One of the former associates, a Frederick, Md., pastor named Christopher Geeslin who served as the U.S. Family Network's director or president from 1998 to 2001, said Buckham further told him in 1999 that the payment was meant to influence DeLay's vote in 1998 on legislation that helped make it possible for the IMF to bail out the faltering Russian economy and the wealthy investors there.

Side note - go read the part in the article per the complexities of the IMF vote - and DeLays vote on behalf of the Russian companies interests - too long to clip here - and not directly related to timeline... but a fascinating demonstration of what one can "pay to play" for per DeLay.

The article then goes into the dealings in Mississippi - it is here that a hint of transition for Buckham from top aide to DeLay, to private lobbyist (and DeLay slush fund manager??) in terms of a timeline:


----Snip--- from later in the article:

Buckham and Tony Rudy were the first DeLay staff members to visit the Choctaw Reservation near Meridian, Miss., where the tribe built a 500-room hotel and a 90,000-square-foot gambling casino. Their trip from March 25 to 27, 1997, cost the Choctaws $3,000, according to statements filed with the House clerk.

DeLay, his wife and Susan Hirschman -- Buckham's successor in 1998 as chief of staff -- were the next to go. Their trip from July 31 to Aug. 2, 1998, was described on House disclosure forms as a "site review and reservation tour for charitable event," and the forms said it cost the Choctaws $6,935.

So sometime in 1998, before July 31, Buckham leaves DeLay's office. But the work with the Choctaw's at least begins in early 1997, while Buckham is chief of staff for DeLay.

Buckham, who was then a lobbyist, arranged DeLay's trip, which included a visit to the tribe's golf course to assess it as a possible location for the lawmaker's annual charity tournament, according to a tribal source. Abramoff told the tribe he could not accompany DeLay because of a prior commitment, the source said.

One day after the DeLays departed for Washington, the U.S. Family Network registered an initial $150,000 payment made by the Choctaws, according to its tax return. The tribe made additional payments to the group totaling $100,000 on "various" dates the following year, the returns state.

So did Buckham only start soliciting funds on the second trip? How did the Choctaw's get the idea that donating to U.S. Family Network, would curry favor with DeLay (as is stated in the article per the motive of the donations)? If it were just solicitations for Buckham, now a private lobbyist, wouldn't the $ have gone directly to his new firm, Alexander Strategies? Interesting... eh.

What we can see: while Chief of Staff to DeLay, in 1996 Buckham organizes/founds a little nonprofit with a bogus mission statement as a grassroots organization interested in supporting social/conservative issues. While Chief of Staff to DeLay in 1997 Buckham makes early visits (pre DeLay's visits) to Russian oil/gas interests and the Choctaw's in Mississippi. In the Russian case Buckham is still chief of staff when he goes with DeLay and company to Russia; in the latter case the DeLay visit occurs after Buckham has left DeLays official employ. In both cases LARGE donations to the US Family Network (Buckham's organization) and in both cases DeLay acts in official ways that benefit the donors. Buckham's new lobbying co. gets a big draw of cash from his non-profit US Family Network.

It would appear that Buckham was doing some $ solicitation (or at least the beginning stages) while still working on staff for DeLay. It would be very interesting to look at the timing for ALL donations to US Family Network - esp those that occured before Buckham resigns from DeLays office. Then look at the travel records for Buckham and DeLay during that same time line. This is where CLEAR and documentable events of creating a political slush fund - can be found. This is where the old question of PAC money = access (the eighties question) moved THROUGH the question of Pay-to-Play (the K Street model) and straight to SLUSH FUND (and dare we say Bribery) politics.

Still not clear for me is the exact timing of when Buckham leaves as Chief of Staff to DeLay (can anyone find that?) This is clearly as interesting... NO, it is MORE interesting than Abramoff's unfolding drama (though they clearly overlap) - because Abramoff can be (and is being painted by some reporters like Schmitt) portrayed as a rogue who got too egotistical - and drew others into his greedy schemes. THIS is direct solicitation - and redistribution of CASH (esp irksome to the true believers would be the foreign sources of some of this cash) - THROUGH THE KEY GOP HOUSE MEMBER SINCE 1998 (after Newt Resigned.)

For example... another area to dig into per time-lines - is referred to in the article:


In addition to the million-dollar payment involving the London law firm, for example, half a million dollars was donated to the U.S. Family Network by the owners of textile companies in the Mariana Islands in the Pacific, according to the tax records. The textile owners -- with Abramoff's help -- solicited and received DeLay's public commitment to block legislation that would boost their labor costs, according to Abramoff associates, one of the owners and a DeLay speech in 1997.

Anyone want to dig in more to the Buckham/DeLay edges of this story? When does Buckham resign? What do we know about the timing of the Mariana Islands visits and Buckham's involvement (timing) related to Buckham's employment per DeLay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. excellent research
I'm bookmarking for later. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I wish I had more resources
I just read a few articles closely... and re-read and made notes per the timeline - as it really set my hair on edge (as something important) when I first read it. If others can find more out about the side threads per DeLay, Buckham, and US Family Network activities - and esp the timelines - I hope that they add it here. The storyline - if it can be developed - is MUCH easier to follow than the Abramoff one (in terms of public consumption)... and I would imagine would be even more troublesome for those "fencesitters" (eg the moderates who haven't yet turned on the GOP, but who are growing increasing on-edge/uncomfortable with the GOP.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. You know salin, I read something in the past couple of days that
actually states that Delay was worried that a mistake was made and Buckham was listed as the head of Alexander and it coincided with his employment as Delay's aide. And they rushed around to fix that. I will try to find it, but I have read so much in the last few days, I am not sure exactly where to look.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I found it quick, what do you know
snip>

The DeLay/Enron scheme began with a meeting at Tom DeLay's Texas home. When Enron lobbyists asked how best to proceed, DeLay noted that Enron could begin by giving his Chief of Staff, Ed Buckham (who at that very moment was forming his own consulting company, the Alexander Strategy Group) and Karl Gallant, a consultant to DeLay's ARMPAC, the contract to manage the campaign.

Both men, members of DeLay's unofficial Kitchen Cabinet, were veterans of stealth political operations. Gallant had recently worked on a propaganda campaign for the tobacco industry and he quickly devised a similar campaign plan for Enron.

An outline for the plan was faxed to Tom DeLay's Washington office. It was printed on Alexander Strategy letterhead complete with Ed Buckham's name in print. The only problem was that Alexander Strategy's CEO was still in the employ of the federal government at the time. Buckham was still serving as Tom DeLay's chief of staff. It was a serious mistake and one they moved quickly to obscure. Gallant said the memo had been just a mock up and that they had used Alexander Strategy stationery by mistake.


snip>

http://www.alternet.org/story/13104
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Interesting little story, isn't it...
remember it was just a tad bit embarrasing when it was replayed in the Enron implosion... but in light of the past six months of disclosures per DeLay, Inc., it takes on a whole deeper and more insidious meaning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is an excellent analysis of the article.
These points were nagging me and you pulled them together perfectly. K & R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wow, excellent work!
Edited on Sun Jan-01-06 01:45 PM by Spazito
This is excellent 'connecting the dots' work, imo. Will be watching this thread with great interest to see what else develops.

Thanks for this.

Recommended and bookmarked.

Edited to add:

Buckham started the Alexander Strategy Group in 1998 according to this:

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Alexander_Strategy_Group

My bet is he started this cover group very shortly after he resigned. Will keep researching to see if I can find an exact date unless someone else is able to provide it.

Here is a link to a Time article on Buckham from March 05, it is an interesting read although it doesn't mention the date Buckham left his position with Delay:

http://www.time.com/time/press_releases/article/0,8599,1037633,00.html

Edited to add this,VERY, VERY interesting article from alternet:

snip

The DeLay/Enron scheme began with a meeting at Tom DeLay's Texas home. When Enron lobbyists asked how best to proceed, DeLay noted that Enron could begin by giving his Chief of Staff, Ed Buckham (who at that very moment was forming his own consulting company, the Alexander Strategy Group) and Karl Gallant, a consultant to DeLay's ARMPAC, the contract to manage the campaign.

Both men, members of DeLay's unofficial Kitchen Cabinet, were veterans of stealth political operations. Gallant had recently worked on a propaganda campaign for the tobacco industry and he quickly devised a similar campaign plan for Enron.

An outline for the plan was faxed to Tom DeLay's Washington office. It was printed on Alexander Strategy letterhead complete with Ed Buckham's name in print. The only problem was that Alexander Strategy's CEO was still in the employ of the federal government at the time. Buckham was still serving as Tom DeLay's chief of staff. It was a serious mistake and one they moved quickly to obscure. Gallant said the memo had been just a mock up and that they had used Alexander Strategy stationery by mistake.

snip

A month later when Buckham finally went off DeLay's federal payroll he was immediately put on the payroll of DeLay's ARMPAC. And Alexander Strategy Group was, as Enron promised, awarded the $750,000 contract to drum up support for electric power deregulation -- a goal that Enron believed would open the $300 billion a year electric markets to Enron.

more

http://www.alternet.org/story/13104/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. kudos to those remembering the Buckham/DeLay/Enron link
and flub in which the "memo" was sent on Alexander Strategy letter head while Buckham was still Chief of Staff to DeLay.

I still find this US Family Network gig a tad bit more interesting. Money is harder to track due to its status, it begins while Buckham is firmly on team DeLay... and when AS is formed - the US Family Network starts giving a big salary/contract to AS group.

What is promising is that in recent times the whole DeLay group of related groups, sometimes referred to as 'DeLay, Inc.' is starting to get some real press coverage and 'diggage'... interesting is how closely some other GOP leaders have followed the lead; Blunt (acting Maj. Leader) has a network of his own - that seems to have some comingling of monies with DeLay, Inc. How many more have emulated the money circle (which seems to clearly pass over legal limits) of the DeLay, Inc. model - and how many of those will be exposed in the next eighteen months?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. I am wondering if both the Alexander Strategy Group AND the US
Family Network were set up at the same time. It seems very possible as Buckham was still working for Delay when he set up both of them. The other question, among many, is whether the start-up funds for both came from the same 'donors'.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. It appears that the US Family Network was set up in 1996 - and Buckham,
the organizer/founder, was still on staff for at least a year and a half to two years after its founding. AS didn't officially open for business (though clearly the Enron letter shows they were soliciting business through DeLay before 'opening) until Buckham leaves DeLay sometime in early 1998. That is what makes the US FN vehicle so very interesting. That, and that it ends up paying Alex. Strategies $120,000 or so a year after AS opens shop (wonder how many of the DeLay groups did the same...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Very welll researced and thought out. And political dynamite if we
weren't dealing with thugs like DeLay, who I'm very afraid, will be pardoned by bush** (just like Kenny Boy Lay) before all the real dirt can be put before the American public.

And then there's the stupidity factor of the Kool Aid Drinkers. Not that I give a shit what they think, and I do believe that they are a minority. But they're a loud, obnoxious bunch who get all the publicity from the bush** ass-kissing aiding and abetting media. I worry that any and all stories about DeLay's obvious criminality, even while being exposed more and more and more, will just be portrayed as 'partisan' politics. On second thought, maybe it is partisan politics. Because there's only one political party calling for justice, truth, decency, and honesty. And it ain't the party of bush** and DeLay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
25. there will be no pardons!
If we IMPEACH the bastard first!!! Get your impeach stickers ready for Jan 9th, and go to Washington on the 31st. I still have hope it can happen, do you?


...little bathroom stickers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Everytime I read a thread like this on DU, I wonder if this information
gets passed on to those who can do something about it and to let people know up there that the general population is not stupid. We can figure these things out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. More dirt on DeLay:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5726519

We need to keep Tommie boy at the top of the headlines for the next few weeks. Congress's delay for DeLay is getting ZERO coverage.

Thank you for posting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. Man
everything is getting moved around. It is making me crazy. :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. well done!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. Here's some good stuff on the DeLay crew...
Edited on Sun Jan-01-06 06:31 PM by Hubert Flottz
Part I: Tom DeLay's Axis of Influence

By Stephen Pizzo, AlterNet. Posted May 10, 2002.




Snip>

An outline for the plan was faxed to Tom DeLay's Washington office. It was printed on Alexander Strategy letterhead complete with Ed Buckham's name in print. The only problem was that Alexander Strategy's CEO was still in the employ of the federal government at the time. Buckham was still serving as Tom DeLay's chief of staff. It was a serious mistake and one they moved quickly to obscure. Gallant said the memo had been just a mock up and that they had used Alexander Strategy stationery by mistake.

But it was clear that Enron had been calling the shots the whole time.


"There was a lot of high-level contact between Buckham and Enron," said a source close to the situation. "It was known among the (Whip's staff) that Buckham was trying to maneuver to get a big contract with Enron. It made a lot of people uncomfortable, but you would pay if you challenged Buckham."

(Roll Call, Feb. 24, 2002)


A month later when Buckham finally went off DeLay's federal payroll he was immediately put on the payroll of DeLay's ARMPAC. And Alexander Strategy Group was, as Enron promised, awarded the $750,000 contract to drum up support for electric power deregulation -- a goal that Enron believed would open the $300 billion a year electric markets to Enron.

The stealth campaign would operate out of an energy consortium dubbed, "Americans for Affordable Electricity" -- a name that Californians would find bitterly ironic just three years later. While other energy producers signed onto the campaign, Enron was calling the shots. Tons more here...

http://www.alternet.org/story/13104

I think Tom and the Bush/Enron cartel even met with the Taliban in Sugarland Texas along about 1999. I'm digging for that story.

*******************

EDIT...


Tom DeLay's Top Aide Broke the Law to Get Enron Lobbying Contract

Roll Call has scored a MAJOR investigative coup that could bring down Tom DeLay's top aide. "At the top of the DeLay political hierarchy sits Edwin Alexander Buckham, a 43-year-old ordained evangelical minister with a dense political and legislative resume who rose to become DeLay's chief of staff after Republicans won the majority in 1994... Buckham left DeLay's staff Dec. 20, 1997, but was immediately hired as a consultant for the lawmaker's leadership PAC, Americans for a Republican Majority." BEFORE he left - on 11-12-97 - Buckham was working on a lobbying proposal to Enron that led to a $750,000 contract to promote electricity "deregulation," Enron-style - after DeLay pushed Enron to hire his aide. Buckham says he had nothing to do with the proposal, and that his letterhead was forged. (A Ton of GREAT links here on the Texas Mobsters...)

http://www.whitecloud.com/enron.htm#ENRON%20Articles


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kliljedahl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
15. Excellent work, ties up a lot of loose ends
Now my brain hurts. GOOD JOB!!!




Keith’s Barbeque Central
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. thanks klilj... and btw
I know we keep saying this, but we really do have to get another Indy get together going, and soon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kliljedahl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I tried & people keep saying it
but when I did only Oubache & I showed up (twice). We kinda gave up after that.



Keith’s Barbeque Central
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I am so sorry, I missed that
I only recall the last meeting at the place by the state house. But the last year did fly by me in a flash.

I loved the idea of a southside meeting. Ever tried Dino's Vino new restaraunt in Fountain Square? I haven't, but I drive by it often - very close to downtown (maybe five minute south of downtown going south on Virginia Avenue).

Maybe I will just break down and pay the 'MeetUp' fee - for several months so that we can have the old notification system. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kliljedahl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Just PMed you, there may be a better way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
24. Bugman better start greasing up that cornhole!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC