Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SCALIA To ACLU: Abortion Rights NOT Constitutional

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 08:52 AM
Original message
SCALIA To ACLU: Abortion Rights NOT Constitutional
Edited on Mon Oct-16-06 09:30 AM by kpete
Scalia: Abortion Rights Not Constitutional
Supreme Court Justice Defends Positions In TV Debate With ACLU

WASHINGTON, Oct. 16, 2006

Quote
"Whether it's good or bad is not my job. My job is simply to say if those things you find desirable are contained in the Constitution."

(AP) Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia defended some of the opinions he has rendered while on the top U.S. court, arguing that nothing in the Constitution supports abortion rights or the use of race in school admissions.

Scalia, a leading conservative voice on the court, sparred in a one-hour televised debate Sunday with American Civil Liberties Union president Nadine Strossen. He said unelected judges have no place deciding politically charged questions when the Constitution is silent on those issues.

Arguing that liberal judges in the past improperly established new political rights such as abortion, Scalia warned, "Someday, you're going to get a very conservative Supreme Court and regret that approach."

"On controversial issues on stuff like homosexual rights, abortion, we debate with each other and persuade each other and vote on it either through representatives or a constitutional amendment," the Reagan appointee said.


more at:
http://www.rawstory.com/showoutarticle.php?src=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cbsnews.com%2Fstories%2F2006%2F10%2F16%2Fsupremecourt%2Fmain2090280.shtml%3Fsource%3DRSSattr%3DPolitics_2090280
http://www.forbes.com/entrepreneurs/feeds/ap/2006/10/16/ap3092445.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Crankie Avalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Vafancul, "Antonin." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Unbelievable, just F'ng Unbelievable!!!!!
How the hell someone as "smart" as Tony Scalia can say; "unelected judges have no place deciding politically charged questions when the Constitution is silent on those issues" and not have a twinge of intellectual doubt while remembering Bush v. Gore, very probably while actually making that comment is


UN-F'NG-BELIEVE-ABLE!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. excellant observation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. Any hunting trips planned with the VP soon, Antonin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. Scalia, you're the scum of the earth - and I have news for you
Nothing in the Constitution says that unelected judges get to choose our President either, you @#$%^ing hypocrite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. what a arrogant and ignorant response out of Scalia
but what do you except from a hoodlum just like the Bush Crime Family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. It's amazing that a Supreme Court Justice
has absolutely no understanding of the Constitution. We do NOT get to vote on whether or not a certain segment of the population has the same rights as the rest of the population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
7. "...as understood at the time it was adopted."
During Sunday's debate, Scalia outlined his judicial philosophy of interpreting the Constitution according to its text, as understood at the time it was adopted.

And, i guess that's why water-boarding is OK. After all, when the founders forbade the infliction of cruel and unusual punishment, they weren't talking about water-boarding. Yeah, I'm convinced. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
8. Oh "unelected judges have no place deciding politically charged questions"
Oh, Tonio-asshat, you mean, like, deciding who the president is????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
9. He is exactly what he looks like: a thug. And only a moderately smart one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
11. About that 2000 decision to appoint the pResident...
where is that in the US Constitution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC