Yes, that is what the RW is basically saying in their most recent attacks (see below for example). WHY? Well, because dems did not do enough in their own party with situations similar to his.
So let's turn this about eh? The rw was all about going after clinton for whitewater and lying under oath about an affair he had. IE, they felt a sitting president should be examined in great detail via spending millions - for the good of the nation.
What about the rest of the bush family and it's hands in the cookie jars? How about Marvin bush and Stratesec (the whole wtc thing) and Wirt Walker (oooh looks like stratesec filed bankruptcy in 2004...interesting stuff there too). And of course Neil Bush and the no child left behind (or is that Foley's saying.....) debacle.
Yeah - let's let this guy totally off the hook, fair is fair eh? Let's also let everyone else off the hook as bush was a coke head (illegal), and...well I could go on all night but would run out of beer.
Hey lurking wingers, are you REALLY saying that Foley should get a pass? Take that to church this Sunday and preach about Mmmm K?
You folks crack me up.
Example:
Here is a RW rag (IDB) take on it:
• In 1983, then-Democratic Rep. Gerry Studds of Massachusetts was caught in a similar situation. In his case, Studds had sex with a male teenage page — something Foley hasn't been charged with.
Did Studds express contrition? Resign? Quite the contrary. He rejected Congress' censure of him and continued to represent his district until his retirement in 1996.
• In 1989, Rep. Barney Frank, also of Massachusetts, admitted he'd lived with Steve Gobie, a male prostitute who ran a gay sex-for-hire ring out of Frank's apartment. Frank, it was later discovered, used his position to fix 33 parking tickets for Gobie.
What happened to Frank? The House voted 408-18 to reprimand him — a slap on the wrist. Today he's an honored Democratic member of Congress, much in demand as a speaker and "conscience of the party."
• In 2001, President Clinton, who had his own intern problem, commuted the prison sentence of Illinois Rep. Mel Reynolds, who had sex with a 16-year-old campaign volunteer and pressured her to lie about it. (Reynolds also was convicted of campaign spending violations.)
You get the idea. Democrats not only seem OK with the kind of behavior for which Foley is charged, but also they protect and excuse it. Only when it's a Republican do they proclaim themselves shocked — shocked! — when it comes to light.
http://www.investors.com/editorial/editorialcontent.asp?secid=1501&status=article&id=244680809798238