|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Philosoraptor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-08-06 08:11 AM Original message |
Jerkoff repub kingston wants Pelosi under oath for 'sitting on' emails |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-08-06 08:13 AM Response to Original message |
1. They claim to be the party of high morals and family values |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-08-06 09:06 AM Response to Reply #1 |
15. To them, responsibility was never a high moral or a family value |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-08-06 08:15 AM Response to Original message |
2. Ok, but then Hastert and all of the other repukes involved should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Epiphany4z (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-08-06 08:15 AM Response to Original message |
3. well gee how long where they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-08-06 08:15 AM Response to Original message |
4. I have not heard anything about Pelosi holding/sitting --Is this a new |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-08-06 10:14 AM Response to Reply #4 |
18. Its desperation. They want to tie the dems into this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hobbit709 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-08-06 08:17 AM Response to Original message |
5. Put all 435 of them under oath |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
C_U_L8R (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-08-06 08:18 AM Response to Original message |
6. all the republicans have left are lies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hav (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-08-06 08:18 AM Response to Original message |
7. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoFlaJet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-08-06 08:19 AM Response to Original message |
8. and this from the party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-08-06 08:22 AM Response to Original message |
9. they were out a year ago to media, wouldnt effect nov election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
symbolman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-08-06 08:24 AM Response to Original message |
10. Time to trot out Ted Stevens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-08-06 08:29 AM Response to Original message |
11. Fine investigate Pelosi and anyone else you want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-08-06 08:45 AM Response to Original message |
12. I believe people see it for what it is...an attempt to soil the Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-08-06 09:01 AM Response to Original message |
13. Ignore the bullshit: Hastert could have derailed this years ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vixengrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-08-06 09:21 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Totally. It was up to the Repugs to pick their timing-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
populistdriven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-08-06 09:02 AM Response to Original message |
14. truth is the FBI sat on it - they should blame them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-08-06 09:07 AM Response to Original message |
16. Pelosi had nothing to do with the emails. that would be Foley. Crazy mofo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-08-06 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
19. Kingston and McHenry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mayberry Machiavelli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-08-06 10:52 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Is Kingston another junior congressman who can be thrown under the bus? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-08-06 11:26 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. 7 terms so far... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-08-06 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
22. Where's the proof? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC