Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

America ponders cutting Iraq in three

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 06:45 PM
Original message
America ponders cutting Iraq in three
The Sunday Times October 08, 2006

Sarah Baxter, Washington



AN independent commission set up by Congress with the approval of President George W Bush may recommend carving up Iraq into three highly autonomous regions, according to well informed sources.

The Iraq Study Group, co-chaired by James Baker, the former US secretary of state, is preparing to report after next month’s congressional elections amid signs that sectarian violence and attacks on coalition forces are spiralling out of control. The conflict is claiming the lives of 100 civilians a day and bombings have reached record levels.

The Baker commission has grown increasingly interested in the idea of splitting the Shi’ite, Sunni and Kurdish regions of Iraq as the only alternative to what Baker calls “cutting and running” or “staying the course”.

“The Kurds already effectively have their own area,” said a source close to the group. “The federalisation of Iraq is going to take place one way or another. The challenge for the Iraqis is how to work that through.”

<more>

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2089-2393750,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RufusEarl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Isn't this the Joe Bidden plan? seems i remember him suggestion this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveOurDemocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I believe it IS Biden's plan...

Think they'll give him any credit??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. That is really the only logical thing to do....remember that
before the early 1918 British rule they were three regions and Britain created Iraq.....this is probably the only way to stem the blood flow....but is it America's choice to do this or is it up the the three factions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetaTrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Splitting up Pakistan and India certainly stopped that sectarian violence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddy Waters Guitar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Yeah, the British are responsible for this mess when they
drew the lines making up Iraq, to divide and rule the people of Mesopotamia, set them against each other there to try to get the oil. This is the pay-the-piper time for that. Still, I wonder how the divide-in-3 plan would work in practice. Baghdad and Kirkuk are both mixed cities, and in Kirkuk in particular, the Turkomen people are also major players. I wonder how those could be divided. Yet another F**k-up of the British Empire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Kurds already effectively have their own area
Oh, Turkey is going to LOVE that!

Let's see just how far we can de-stabilize the entire region with more colonial imperialistic meddling. First we shove them all together, then we pull them all apart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Agreed. I don't see Turkey just letting that happen.
Unless we plan on being a buffer force between Turkey and Kurdistan, this is a bad idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yet another U.S. betrayal
Edited on Sat Oct-07-06 06:54 PM by Boomer
We've repeatedly assured a very nervous Turkey that we will not create an autonomous Kurdish state. Such an action would support the "terrorist" Kurdish nationals inside Turkey.

Oh, yeah, and also inside Iran. Funny thing, that.

So we stab the Turks in the back in order to put a thorn in the side of Iran, plus try and salvage some part of the situation in Iraq.

After all, who need allies in the region?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I'd forgotten about the Kurds in Iran!
That's a very good point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Yeh, but Iranian Kurds are a much smaller minority
This is going to be provocative move, if they do it. I'm pretty sure the commission will recommend against any measure beyond homerule for Kurdistan. Full autonomy would screw up the only peaceful region in the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Won't this cause trouble regarding who gets the oil? Wait a minute...
What was I thinking? The U.S. gets the oil. Silly me!

(Baker's) group will not advise “partition”, but is believed to favour a division of the country that will devolve power and security to the regions, leaving a skeletal national government in Baghdad in charge of foreign affairs, border protection and the distribution of oil revenue.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well, that's "democracy" for you. The U.S. deciding Iraq's fate.
Maybe the day will come when the Chinese or Venezualans or Mauritanians will decide to split America up.

Actually, it looks to me that the Iraqis ARE deciding their own fate and the geniuses of the PNAC are reduced to bystanders to the fait accompli.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Balfour redux.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
11. We're screwed anyway. I say go ahead and partition the country.
Edited on Sat Oct-07-06 07:13 PM by Selatius
I say that if we are to form a loosely-held confederation of three states, then it should be put to the ballot for the Iraqis to decide. If they reject it, fine. If they don't, just as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. And this would be a free and independant Iraq determining
its own future, all sovereign and everything, almost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. This was the plan from the get go
I heard about this before the war started.

and like clockwork here it is.

I didn't know Biden was touting this also, but it explains a lot about Biden.

BTW...there is a similar partition plan for Iran.

This stuff comes straight from the top of the NWO globalist architecture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. How is it globalist if they're cutting the country into smaller pieces?
Nah, the neocons have been shooting down this suggestion since the summer of '03. This will scare the shit out of the Turks who don't want Kurdistan to gain its own powerbase.

I've never heard of a plan to partition Iran. Who is talking about that? What are the divisions--I thought Iran was much more homogenous than Iraq, which has always been a polyglot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. The plan
(I think it came out of Bilderberg) was to use America as the muscle(Bad cop-enforcement arm) let the situation deteriorate, build 14 permanent bases as islands, Then hand the whole shebang over to the good cop (UN or Nato forces). Partition it in 3 pieces so Iraq could never unite and the oil could never be nationalized. Same thing for Iran but I think they're talking about 9 or more partitions there, If I remember correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I know it for a fact.
I was in a conference room at Purvin&Gertz, Houston, and saw the plans that were drawn up to accomplish exactly the partitioning.

And they are planning on population redistribution, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
20. Yeah: Divide Iraq in three: Regular, Premium, and Unleaded!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC