Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reyonds is saying in his new ad that he "forced" Foley to resign.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 05:04 PM
Original message
Reyonds is saying in his new ad that he "forced" Foley to resign.
Is this accurate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. .
Edited on Sat Oct-07-06 05:08 PM by Hav
If you mean Reynolds from NY, I doubt it. And he can say whatever he want, even if it were true, there is no way that Foley could have stayed a Congressman after what came out.
He belongs to those who should lose their job because of this scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. I would think that if any congressperson had the authority to do that
it would be Hastert.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Poll is right below this post he rose two points with ad
Edited on Sat Oct-07-06 05:17 PM by Monkeyman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. i really doubt, i think Foley quit all on his own once he found out what
abc had, remember Brian ross said Foley's chief of staff tried to make a deal that if Ross would hold back the im's than foley would give ABC the exclusive on his resignation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deathdog Donating Member (167 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. IF it is, he should have done it sooner nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sce56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. I seriously doubt it! He resigned as soon as ABC confronted him with IM's

Got Fascism Yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. by accepting a hundred grand from him and not turning him in?
An obscure and circuitous strategy at best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. as posted up thread ..... bull shit
* Foley quit P.D.Q. when ABC told him they were going w/ the story.
* Reynolds had prior knowledge as to Foley's actions and even knowing
about those "actions," he took money from Foley, and then did not turn him in.

And didn't he do the presser w/ the kids so he didn't have to answer ?s ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ktowntennesseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. According to KO's lead story last night,
Foley resigned as soon as the story broke, and Reynolds, Hasturd, etc, etc, didn't even have time to speak to him or ask him to resign. Claiming they forced him out is about like jumping up after tripping on your shoelace and falling on your face and announcing "I meant to do that!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. Probably...but
only after he learned ABC was going to release what Foley did and people would find out Reynolds is a pedophile enabler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Probably no, by all accounts
Never give these assholes the benefit of the doubt in the middle of a scandal that doesn't make any policy difference whatsoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'm thinking tom reynolds is a lyin'
sonovabitch and he should get called on those ads by his Democratic opponent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. Just say no
This is a tidbit that doesn't matter in the bigger picture of anybody's life, doesn't matter later, but matters completely RIGHT NOW. This is the part of politicing that seems to me to be okay to take chances on. To my knowledge, Foley resigned on his own. Until I hear different from a reliable source, that's what I'm sticking with. That's how you be an echo chamber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. Even if he did, it won't help.
He should have forced him to resign when he knew about the interaction with the pages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC