Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Glitches take toll (CO Election Court Battle Aftermath)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 04:02 PM
Original message
Glitches take toll (CO Election Court Battle Aftermath)
http://www.rockymountainnews.com/

Election commission to mothball part of new voting system
Officials urge Coloradans to vote by absentee ballot
September 26, 2006

"Denver's election commission has decided to mothball part of its controversial new voting system because of troubles that surfaced during August's primary.
The 50 card activators slated to be decommissioned - at least for the November election - came from Chicago, which sold them at a discount to Denver after a problem- plagued election there in March.

Denver paid $35,000 for the activators after Chicago began updating its voting system, said Alton Dillard, election commission spokesman. They are used in the city's 240 new Sequoia Voting Systems machines.

The election commission conceded that a significant number of problems surfaced in August - mainly with voters being given the wrong ballots.

John Gaydeski, the city's new election director, denied accusations by City Auditor Dennis Gallagher that the machines are unreliable. "

Dennis is my former state senator, and he's a fighter. :thumbsup: He'll keep after this one!

Wasn't that really clever--buying equipment from Chicago after it failed in their March election.

Those republicans... really schmardt... :crazy:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. They failed in Chicago, so who's surprised that they failed again?
Sounds like a typical Repub business deal- hand the
taxpayers' money to your buddies for repackaged junk,
then just DENY that there's any problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Isn't that beautiful?
Why in the heck didn't *WE* think of doing that...??

:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I imagine it's those damn SCRUPLES again!
They've been holding us back for a long time now. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Second article from today -- both on front page
http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/elections/article/0,2808,DRMN_24736_5021678,00.html

Officials urge Coloradans to vote by absentee ballot
By Ann Imse, Rocky Mountain News
September 26, 2006

Some Colorado counties stand ready to help voters cast their ballots by mail to alleviate concerns about potential tampering or other problems with computerized voting machines.
In fact, Denver and Arapahoe counties are urging citizens to vote absentee with mailed paper ballots, simply because November's ballot is so long.

A Denver judge ruled Friday that the computerized machines had not been tested sufficiently for security vulnerabilities.

With some two dozen decisions to make, "voters really need to consider absentee and early voting options," said Denver Election Commission spokesman Alton Dillard. There are 14 state ballot issues, as well as races for Congress, the state legislature, governor, other statewide offices and other contests."

snip

"The secretary of state did an "abysmal" job of security testing on the new touch-screen machines, Denver District Judge Lawrence Manzanares ruled Friday. But he said it was too late to bar the machines from the election, as plaintiffs in the lawsuit requested."

The big, bold headline on the front page today is : BALLOT BOX SCRAMBLE

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I don't trust the mail any more than I trust Diebold
Even if my ballot makes it there what guarantee do I have that it wont be incinerated?

Paper ballots DAMMIT! What's so hard about that? I'd rather drop a marble in a jar that worry about my vote being counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Denver bought Chicago rejects????
What genius okayed the purchase?

(And a high five to the clever bastard in Chicago who so efficiently dumped his trash.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Genius? A Republican?
Ohhhh, my head hurts....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. Don't forget to rate the thread, folks. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. THanks! Also, after reading the articles, good idea to thank the
reporters, with a word to the paper itself.

You can be SURE they're getting plenty of hatemail!

Thanks!

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes! Following up with the reporters is a great idea.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Indeed. Needs just two more votes...
Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. regular brainiacs
recommended

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. BWAHAHAHA! "brainiacs" indeedy....
Well, as long as the companies get their 30 pieces of silver, eh??

sigh...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. What's wrong w/pencil & paper? It sure wouldn't cost $1.4 million!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I dunno.... that paper is getting mighty 'spensive...
Besides, where's the profit, yanno?

This is the U.S. bleeping A -- gotta have that profit to some company!

I'm sure there's a lobbyist somewhere who could splain that to ya.. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
17. Thanks, everyone, for getting this to the front page....
I thought it was worth reading.

The Colorado Election Fraud Fighters deserve a large pat on the back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 05:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC