In this thread,
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=364&topic_id=208456Carville is accused of saying Reid committed a crime by criticiing Democrats. The transcript clearly shows that to be totally false.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10909406/page/4/MR. CARVILLE: I’d like to think that’s refreshing. And you know, it’s not the crime—we all make mistakes—the crime is, when you made a mistake, not to acknowledge one. And I think that Senator Reid that—and my hat’s off to him. And so many times this happens and people shout a whole lot the next day. He did that. It doesn’t take away from the central point: this Congress and this administration has a record, and what Abramoff has done is something that goes right to the heart of it.
And it is true, the Democrats need to be more reform-oriented. We argue that extensively in the book. As Paul pointed out, there’s some evidence that they are. The fact is, Senator Reid said, “A document that came out of my office went too far,” doesn’t detract at all from the real problems that are being faced in this Congress, the real corruption that really exists, the number of indictments that have come down already, the number of indictments that are getting ready to come down. The numerous and extensive contacts between Abramoff and the White House—all of this is going to come out. And I’ve got to commend Senator Reid, and I wish more politicians would do that. Again, we all make mistakes, he went out and acknowledged it the next day; my hat’s off to him. I thought it was a refreshing move he made.
What part of not do we have difficulty with. He clearly and without any ambiguity stated that the crime would have been not acknowledging that the tone of the document. I happen to think that Reid hadn't made a mistake by singling out the Senators, but regardless of that, Carville didn't call what Reid did a crime. We should stop telling stories about our spokesmen.