Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MORE "Reed Is Toast" from the Texas Observer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 03:00 PM
Original message
MORE "Reed Is Toast" from the Texas Observer
Edited on Sun Jan-22-06 03:12 PM by kpete
New in the Observer
Thin Reed
Will Abramoff's Deep Throat Swallow Godís Mouthpiece?
by Andrew Wheat

Evidence is mounting that former Christian Coalition leader Ralph Reed Jr., along with a former leader of the Texas Christian Coalition, may have illegally lobbied Texas state officials on behalf of crooked federal lobbyist Jack Abramoff and his clients.


An Observer investigation reveals that Reed may not have been the only Christian Coalition leader working secretly for Abramoff’s gambling clients. Reed-Abramoff correspondence indicates that Chuck Anderson, then-head of the Texas Christian Coalition, also helped lobby Texas officials on behalf of Abramoff’s Indian gaming clients. Anderson, who now works for Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst, also appears to have worked on Texas gambling issues without registering.




Additionally, the Observer has found evidence that Ralph Reed clandestinely lobbied Texas school officials on behalf of the in-school television network Channel One in 2002—when Channel One’s parent company was paying Abramoff a $320,000 annual retainer. Texas law generally requires people to register as lobbyists if they receive more than $500 a quarter to directly communicate with a state official on public policy. Ralph Reed never registered as a Texas lobbyist despite evidence that he called at least one member of the State Board of Education in 2002 to influence a board resolution.

In Reed’s case, such a fine could be huge. He reportedly received as much as $4 million just to help the Louisiana Coushatta shut down the Tigua casino in El Paso. To Reed’s advantage, Texas lobby-registration laws are subject to a two-year statute of limitations. Invoking a legal theory called “tolling,” the groups that filed the Reed complaint argue that this two-year period should not be clocked from when the alleged lobbying occurred in 2001, since the public was unaware of the alleged offense as a direct result of Reed’s failure to register. Instead, the complainants argue that the two-year limit should be clocked from late 2004, when the U.S. Senate first revealed Reed’s advocacy in Texas.



tons more at:
http://www.texasobserver.org/showArticle_new.asp?ArticleID=19
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Will he GOPers who HAVEN'T received money from ...
Edited on Sun Jan-22-06 03:38 PM by NanceGreggs
... Jack Abramoff please stand up and identify yourselves?

Yeah, all three of you ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. A Godly Religious Rightwinger is a crook?
I don't believe it.

I guess Triumph the Insult Comic Dog was right. Reed IS going to end up as someone's bitch.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC