Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The 'homeland' has been safe for 5 years under Bush." Meme alert!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 06:23 PM
Original message
"The 'homeland' has been safe for 5 years under Bush." Meme alert!
Edited on Fri Sep-08-06 06:30 PM by gully
If I hear this statement again without Democrats stating the obvious "THE 'HOMELAND' WAS SAFE UNDER CLINTON FOR 8 YEARS" I'm going to scream.

I just saw another Republican state this on MSNBC and the Democrat who is presenting our side said NADA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Chimichurri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. I hate that they call the United States "The Homeland" it's so
Hitleresque in nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. "Master race"
Indeed, it is Hitleresque.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Does that count the time between 9/11 and the ANTHRAX ATTACKS?
Remember those attacks with "WMD" right here on American soil that killed Americans and targeted Democratic senators who opposed the Patriot Act?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Gosh, I dunno. Democrats must not be "homeez."
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Boy, does that word "homeland" sound Nazi-ish enough?
It's always gotten on my nerves.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Idiots love lofty platitudes.
Gets on my nerves too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Never mind that the dust is still settling on the worst attack in history
and we have been in a hot war ever since. Just never mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. And the dust of Anthrax that started on Sept. 18th 2001
http://www.globalgreen.org/greenbuilding/GAHI.html


The 2001 anthrax attacks in the United States occurred over the course of several weeks beginning on September 18, 2001 (a week after the September 11, 2001 attacks). Letters containing anthrax bacteria were mailed to several news media offices and two U.S. Senators, killing five people and sickening seventeen others. The crime remains unsolved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Since the geniuses at the FBI couldn't budge that one, it was
utterly forgotten & is never to be mentioned by jr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jellybeancurse Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. I always find it kind of funny
(in a cry not haha sort of way) that no one ever seems to notice 9/11 happened on Bush's watch. "He has keeped us safe" we always here, but people seem to oddly forget that one day in september five years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. And those people forget Clinton had one attack on "the homeland"
from Al Qaida ONE MONTH after he took office. That attack killed 4 I believe.

Contrast that to Bush in office for 9 months and 3000 dead.

Nutcases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeautifulLoser Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. You forgot Tim McVeigh
1995 OKC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Tim McVeigh was an american who committed a crime on american
Edited on Fri Sep-08-06 06:57 PM by gully
soil. Should we hold Bush accountable for every crime committed by anyone in every state, while he's been in office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. The difference in both the OKC and first WTC attacks
is that the perpetrators in both cases were arrested, tried, convicted and punished. Through conventional police methods, with no need to inspect the reading lists of library patrons.


Bush admits he doesn't spend a lot of time worrying about bin Laden. Too busy running a phony war i guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Good point.
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jellybeancurse Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #21
31. Of course not
but I think the main opposition, and why people point this out, is that there is an image of Bush that is put forward of him being this infallible leader. An image in which he protects us with his mighty NSA and CIA prisons. All of which we need. :sarcasm:

I mean it's such a ludicrous argument anyway. If i tell you reading this sentence protects you against gorillas and no gorillas attack you, does that mean my sentence is a shield against gorillas? Of course not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Well now "t's no accident we've not had an attack in 5 years"
Edited on Sat Sep-09-06 07:30 PM by gully
but it WAS sheer luck that we only had one attack from Al Qaida in the first month Bill Clinton was in office. /sarcasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
33. And we caught the guys who did it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. We keep you safe . . but any minute now, BOOM!

We kept you safe, they wouldn't have.

But, we can't keep you safe. Attack is coming any minute.

But we'll save you. But you'd better be afraid. . .

Attack Iraq because "it's central" to "the enemy" to trap and bankrupt the US in an endless war -- like the one in Iraq.

You'd think you'd see more of their heads spontaneously exploding from the pressure of all their insane notions colliding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Yep
a reletive today "reminded me" of 911 when I mentioned a ocal war casualty in Iraq. Of course I reminded said relative that 911 had NOTHING to do with Iraq and that Bush isn't concerned about OBL. She looked stunned.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. Speaking of stunned. . .
Edited on Fri Sep-08-06 07:36 PM by pat_k
Chris Matthews brought up the specter of the unthinkable: that the United States military -- misused as a proxy for diplomacy, too few for the job, unequipped for guerrilla warfare and death squads, -- could actually LOSE in Iraq. We could lose Bagdad. We could see a repeat of April 29, 1975.

It was a segment with Michael Feldman and Tucker Eskew. The transcript doesn't seem to be up, and I don't recall how exactly it came up, but Matthews said something along the lines of "what if it's like Vietnam, Iraqi's -- who we promised so much -- hanging onto helicopters . . . stepping on fingers. . ."

They both looked stunned, gobsmacked, short-circuited. Then both started in at once, no it won't. . . pulling out. . . stammer stammer.

The unthinkable is becoming not only thinkable, the probability increases with every day and every failed effort to "quell the violence."



The Long Last Day
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. And they'll blame dissenters when we surely do lose.
"They aided and abeded the enemy." :eyes:

As if the frikken Iraqi resistence is sitting in the middle of the desert listening to war critique before making strategic moves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. Really?
Then how come I can't take my mascara on the plane with me? :crazy:

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. LOL
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
16. Bush is like a pyromaniac standing in the rubble of a burned-out building.
"Well, hey! At least you don't have to worry about fires anymore!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
19. Not so much from natural disasters though
New Orleans doesn't count? I bet you could get some arguments from New Orleanians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
20. safe? If we're safe then why are we still at "orange"?
Couldn't "safe" at least be a less sucky color? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. www.shhh.com
Let's not make sense. It's tough on conservatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
22. The "homeland" has been safe because the terra-ists actually PLAN
stuff before they go willy-nilly "into action"..unlike some presidents we know :( They will attack us again, when they are good and ready..and not before.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
23. Except when Bush and Cheney unleashed the anthrax...
yeah, we've been "safe" :freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. September 18th 2001 scared the shit out of anyone who opened mail
which was the largest terrorist act against the nation
that affected millions personally in their day to day life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Absolutely right.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC