Accuvote 2004 & 2006 Monitoring?

[Wizard777]

Now that we have to trust President Bush that We The People cannot be trusted because we are the enemy. We must also trust President Bush not to use his ingenious lil Executive Order to monitor internet election results or seize electronic ballots from past or future elections. Now there is something you wouldn't want to get a warrant for. Would it be a major threat to Bush's National Security for America to suddenly turn the Senate into a brush hog lawn mower? Can that really be left to chance? What do you think? Special Investigator? Microscope? Anyone?

[Wizard777]

1. Kick

:kick:
:banghead:

[LittleClarkie]

2. You might want to try and express yourself a bit more clearly

if you want a response. I don't quite get what you're talking about here. I've heard of Accuvote, but don't know much about them. You might want to start there. Who are they? Are they Diebold-like, or are they a good thing?

[Wizard777]

3. Accuvote, Diebold, etc. Is all internet voting.

There was some scuttle butt as to why the Exit polls weren't even close to the final tally in Ohio. I theorized that if the internet voting machines were rigged to at times select Bush when Kerry was selected. That would be an error. If the machines sent automated error reports. That could be used as an ipso facto prevoting poll. Each error report would indicate an attempt to vote for Kerry.

Now we know about this Executive Order authorizing the military and domestic law enforcement to intercept communications and make seizures. We also know they have using this domestically. American to American They have not been obtaining FISA warrants either. WHY? For the NSA to Intercept the internet election data transmission and possibly even the seizure of some of the electronic ballots. When they sought the required FISA warrants for those intercepts and seizures. They would be confessing to the crime of elections fraud. Then they have the benefit of being able to hide that crime of elections fraud inside a military instalation under a top secret stamp. Talk about the invincible position.

The NSA isn't exactly your run of the mill Orin Hatch Senate database cracker hackers. I think they could crack the encrpytion and put it back without leaving any traces of tampering. It's the perfect crime. But if it was commited. Was it to ensure 50 Billion or more in handshake payments? Motive, opportunity, and ability. Anyone?

[LittleClarkie]

4. Anyone... Bueller... Buelller...

K&R

[Wizard777]

5. Okay so lets say Bush didn't steal the 2004 elections.

The Question facing us now is, did he have NSA do it by Executive Order? The NSA has also admitted to using Banned Cookies set to expire in 2035. Right ahead of the 2036 Presidential Elections. Will the Democrats lose the next 7 Presidential Elections? Why are the cookies banned? Could they exploit voting data transmission vulnerabilities? Could they make voting data alterations?
After all George Bush is well known for his self restraint in the assumption of power. It's non existant. So the man will risk Posse Comitatus Violations (treason) in having the American military spying on the American People. But having the NSA put the fix on an election to continue his meglomanical drive for supreme world power is going too far? Just out of the question for a man of his background and character? His attorney now our Attorney General has publicly offered his legal opinion that President Bush is "above the law." Now if that means he has renedered legal advice in the commission of crime. He becomes an accessory to that crime and attorney client priveledge goes out the window. Could this be a Militarized Watergate? I would say no. If Bush hadn't already had the military illefally BREAK INTO A FREAKIN COUNTRY! Because of his paranoid delusions that could have been more appropriately and Constitutionally handled with a Letter of Marque and Reprisal.