Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I found the most disgusting pro-life website EVER

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:04 PM
Original message
I found the most disgusting pro-life website EVER
Move all hard objects away from your computer and click on...

http://www.klanparenthood.com

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
deadmessengers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. pro-life = anti-freedom
Pro-life my ass. How many of those people support the war in Iraq or capital punishment? If it's less than 90% of the people who call themselves "pro life" I'll eat my underwear. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. You better start eating
I have never seen a survey in which less than one fourth of pro lifers are also against the death penalty. Given that Catholism is firmly against both abortion and the death penalty that shouldn't be a surprise. To name just a few of the successful politicians who are consistant on this point, Dennis K (before he changed on abortion), David Bonior, and the elder Casey. In addition McClaughin of the McClaughin group is also consistant in that regard as was Cardinal Bernadin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadmessengers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. And the war on Iraq? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. Here is some stuff to back me up
http://pewforum.org/docs/index.php?DocID=91

Leads to a poll given by Pew.

There is a great table there that I can't copy.






Varying Opinions on Life Issues
The general public takes varying, and at times contradictory, attitudes toward the issues that constitute the so-called "culture of life." This also is the case for members of major religious traditions.

White evangelical Protestants overwhelmingly adopt a pro-life stance on abortion: 68% believe abortion should not be permitted at all, or should be allowed only in cases of rape, incest or to save the woman's life. A smaller majority of white evangelicals (58%) oppose making it legal for doctors to give terminally ill patients the means to end their lives.

In the case of stem cell research, half of white evangelicals say it is more important to avoid destroying the potential life of human embryos than to conduct stem cell research that may lead to new medical cures. At the same time, white evangelicals strongly support the death penalty for those convicted of murder; just 15% oppose the death penalty.

White Catholics also have inconsistent attitudes on life issues. Roughly four-in-ten take a pro-life stance on abortion (43%) and in opposing physicians being permitted to help dying patients to end their lives (42%). Just three-in-ten white Catholics (29%) say it is more important to avoid destroying the potential life of human embryos in stem cell research than to conduct research that may result in new medical cures. And about the same number (27%) oppose the death penalty.

For their part, seculars overwhelmingly dissent from pro-life positions on abortion, stem cell research and end-of-life questions. More seculars than white evangelicals or mainline Protestants oppose the death penalty for convicted murderers; still, only about three-in-ten (29%) express this view.

Some important notes that are made clearer in the table I can't copy. White Catholics are more likely to oppose the DP than the people as a whole and only very slightly (within MOE) less likely than seculars to oppose the DP. Evangelicals are actually more likely (though again within MOE) to oppose the DP than mainline protestants.

Incidently the list I gave you works for the war on Iraq with two deletions. Bernardin was dead by the time of the Iraq war and McClaughin supported the war. Though you can add both Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict to the list who are consistant.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. del del del
Edited on Tue Dec-27-05 12:22 PM by BlueEyedSon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. See a later post for link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. How do you find out who put this up?
I'm not a tech geek, but am really curious who's behind this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Here ya go - with a link to some info about the owner
Edited on Tue Dec-27-05 12:20 PM by Cerridwen

Registrant:
Mark Crutcher

Registered through: GoDaddy.com
Domain Name: KLANPARENTHOOD.COM

Domain servers in listed order:
NS1.THEPLANET.COM
NS2.THEPLANET.COM

More about crutcher here (with picture):

http://www.prolifepac.com/html/who6mcrutcher.htm

edit to add another link to info about owner:

http://www.nuvo.net/archive/2005/03/30/mark_crutchers_obsession.html

This is one sick, twisted, (&^%$F#.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. I notice he has only ONE kid and has been married 25 years
Anyone else wonder how this guy avoided having 12 kids?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Look at him, the only time he ever got busy was on wedding night
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. LOL - 2 great minds....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. That is baaad
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Did you look at him? I think his wife "avoided having kids"
:evilgrin:

Yeah, I know, juvenile of me to comment on his looks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. But funny and judging by his appearance,
most appropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. What would he do if someone raped his underage daughter
if it was someone (racially, politically :)) repulsive to him?
if the pregnancy might be life threatening?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
28. Thank y'all
Notice his wife is named for her place of conception (Tulane or two-lane). Sorry, just had to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanarrett Donating Member (813 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
30. Looks like a cross between Rush and Rove--maybe their
ugly fucking lost brother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
32. How come fundies can't take a decent portrait?
This is a side commentary to the real issue, but why is it that when fundamentalists have official portraits taken for things like this, all of the pictures are out of focus, lit wrong and exposed wrong, and all the fundies look like they just got done changing their oil? "Yes, John, I know you've got half a pound of oily road dirt on your face, but don't worry, just put on your cheapest suit and you'll look great!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-29-05 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
37. Here's more on him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Go over to
http://www.whois.net and enter in the domain name. It should come up with the information on the owner and who hosts it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Go here and complete the form
http://who.godaddy.com/whoischeck.aspx?domain=KLANPARENTHOOD.com

I did it, but I'm not comforable with the privacy implications of posting the info here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. here's how
the standard tool for this is "whois", in the form of for instance www.whois.net (there are alternatives, see google).

enter the domain name in the search field, without the www part.

it comes up with some info and refers to the registration intermediary for further info. go to that website and enter the domain name again. it comes up with some more info.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. FYI - just go to any domain name registrars site and do a "whois"
search on the domain name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
24. I bet he feels like he doesn't have enough control over his woman
and he needs to exert some control over many, many others....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Inflammatory Rhetoric
If we wanted to play that game, we could point to the millions of slave women forced to bear children they didn't want.

We could talk about the brutal regime in Romania where abortion was outlawed and a doctor who helped (or tried to help) a woman who had fallen prey to a back alley butcher could himself be brought up on charges.

It was legal to value women solely for their reproductive abilities and to place the well being of a fetus over the life of a woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. These people are arrogant enough when they call themselves pro-life
its even worse when they try to pretend that we are racists.

Actual quote from a conservative, pro-life person I know: "Hey, Condi Rice is too smart to be black anyway"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Too smart to be hetero, too, it seems. Heh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's disgusting
but more important is the analogy of abortion to the Holocaust. It's such blatant shit that it's difficult to get through it without laughing. It wasn't enough to rile me, though, because it is all hyperbole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. Sickos
They'll say anything to further their totalitarian cause. It's real funny they use this, since most radical pro-lifers are probably racist too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bike Punk Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. just the entry page
makes me not want to see whats inside. The very fact that they 'align' themselves with the Klan says everything i need to know about them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #12
31. They aren't aligning themselves with the Klan
This is worse.

The thesis of klanparenthood.com (he's also registered klannedparenthood.com) is that abortion has killed more blacks than the KKK ever dreamed of. The site is completely anti-Planned Parenthood and is NOT pro-Klan. He's even got a page up with all these eugenics comments that sound exactly like quotes out of Mein Kampf, but under each one is an attribution "Margaret Sanger, Founder, Planned Parenthood." (It looks like this--quotes are pulled out of my ass and you'll understand why in a second, but you'll get the picture...

Star-bellied sneetches are an inferior race, we must do everything in our power to eliminate them.
--Margaret Sanger, Founder, Planned Parenthood

The star-bellied sneetch is infecting our homes and hearths with anti-American liberalism.
--Margaret Sanger, Founder, Planned Parenthood

The only way to save America is to purify the sneetch race, and this we will do by convincing the star-bellied sneetch to abort copiously.
--Margaret Sanger, Founder, Planned Parenthood

I don't think this guy would know an actual Klansman if one walked up and kicked him in the ass, which he desperately needs. Yes, by an actual Klansman. Personally, if I lived between the owner of this website and the Grand Dragon of the KKK and was forced to go hang out with one of them, I'd go over to the KKK guy's house. There'd be no other choice. If you could somehow avoid talking about minorities, liberals and immigrants and just concentrate on sports and barbecue, he'd be much more fun than that other guy. That other guy wouldn't shut the fuck up about how gay atheists are making all the black Christian women pregnant so they have to get abortions. (Yeah, I'd say that too.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
27. ANTI-CHOICE, not PRO-LIFE, please....
It is a VERY important frame.

Thanks,

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
29. they are not pro-life and you know it! they are ANTI-CHOICE!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. Well, no shit
I also know that some of our new members can recognize the term "pro-life" and identify with the people who call themselves that, but might not recognize the more correct terms "pro-fetus" and "anti-choice." So I'm just tryin' to help them out, 'kay?

We need to drop the "anti-choice" meme because that might suggest that those people, in addition to being against abortion, are also against letting the born starve, freeze, get beaten to death or die of the lack of medical care. You know, they might actually be pro-LIFE. Pro-fetus is the most correct term to describe those people--as long as you're a fetus you're precious and you Must Be Saved, but once your feet hit air you're on your own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-29-05 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. how would anit-choice suggest any of those things?
since when does reproductive choice= universal health care or prenatal care or welfare/ foodstamp funding?
they are THREE separate issues completely.


and fetus is WAY off base, they don't want the morning after pill, or any abortions performed BEFORE it's a fetus either. you don't actually conceive and instantly have a fetus in your uterus, you know.

Perhaps other DUers would learn not to use RW terminology if you didn't use it so blithely, and without comment.
they are anti-choice and anti-privacy. they want the govt in your bedroom.

pro-fetus doesn't begin to cover it, plus it just sounds soooo stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-29-05 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. I think they're all tied together
I've developed a profile of a typical "pro-life" person. They are:

* in favor of the government banning abortion, although the totality of their proposed ban varies. Some will allow it in cases where the mother's life or health are in danger, severe fetal abnormality, rape or incest. Others say mother's life only, and the most extreme PL viewpoint wants it banned with no exceptions even for the mother's life. If you are having an ectopic pregnancy (100-percent fatal to the mother if the pregnancy is not terminated) they call it God's will. Anyway, they want the government to ban abortion. They also want anything that can prevent a pregnancy from occurring to be banned. Sex is only for making more little fundies, don't you know? The woman is not allowed to enjoy sex in that community. The woman is to see sex as a Duty, a distasteful obligation that must be performed to fulfill the Bible's admonition to be fruitful and multiply. And believe you me, they're trying to get men to see it the same way.

* against any government-provided social service, to include any kind of public healthcare, AFDC, WIC, or anything else that gives government monies to the needy. Such services should only be provided by churches, who are free to deny them to anyone who doesn't attend the providing church.

* many are against public education--they believe in parochial schooling and homeschooling.

But let me tell you why I like using the RW's own terms against them. Let's say we all chose "anti-choice" as our descriptor for them. We can work all day long to try to convince the general populace that RW people are "anti-choice, anti-woman, anti-baby, anti-American." We can do this fairly easily because it's true. Then some RW comes along and says "we're not any of those things, we're Pro-Life." All of a sudden the jackbooted thugs kicking in healthcare facility doors because They Don't Charge Patients Enough For Their Services disappears and is replaced by soft fuzzy images of precious babies wrapped in pink sleepers--babies who were saved from the jaws of abortionists' forceps only by the grace of God and the love of a sidewalk counselor. If we use the RW term, it's different. If the general population comes to know "pro-life" as mothers being buried because their pregnancies killed them (ectopic pregnancy accounts for two percent of all pregnancies) or low-income Catholic children developing rickets because the only place their mothers can get vitamin D drops is at the Baptist clinic--who won't treat Catholics because they "worship idols"--the RW can't turn shit around on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
33. WTF is this BS?
About 13 percent of American women are black, but they
submit to over 35 percent of the abortions.



Submit? Is he suggesting that someone is twisting their arms to have abortions? :eyes:


I am sure though that he'd be all to happy to make them SUBMIT to having the children against their will, should abortion be outlawed by him and his rabid anti-choice pals. :mad:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatriotGames Donating Member (896 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
34. And people call animal rights activists sickos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-29-05 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
38. Please do not use the words "Pro-life"
Whenever a Democrat does so, they reinforce the lie.

Call them anti-choice or anti-freedom. Don't ever play into their hands by calling them "Pro-*"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC