Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Malloy say "Fuck" on Tuesday's Randi Rhodes show?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:01 AM
Original message
Did Malloy say "Fuck" on Tuesday's Randi Rhodes show?
Edited on Fri Sep-01-06 10:38 AM by Finnfan
I got in my car after work on Tuesday around 5:15 and as the radio popped on, I heard Malloy say "-uck". Honest to God, I missed the first consonant. He followed whatever he said with "Do you think that's enough foul language for this administration, Kathy?" I remember thinking, oh shit, I hope he didn't say what I thought he just said.

Can anyone who listened to Tuesday's show clarify what was said during the 5 o'clock segment of the Randi Rhodes Show?

On edit: I listen on XM satellite radio, which is not censored.

On furthur edit: He did NOT say "fuck". I misheard him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. archives I believe are available here:
www.whiterosesociety.org and www.airamericaplace.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. Would that explain his termination?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. IF he said it, it most certainly would.
And IF he said it, I would fully support AAR's decision. IF he said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. here is Tuesday's show
Edited on Fri Sep-01-06 10:08 AM by helderheid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. That is at odds with the reason given - financial. Did AAR say
Edited on Fri Sep-01-06 10:30 AM by higher class
financial or did they have a list of grievances and took a legal shortcut of the safe kind? Did Kathy say financial and AAR said something else? Did AAR and the Malloys have an agreement to say it was financial? So ... the real story is ...........? It matters. It matters in the way Malloy supporters look at AAR. If it's financial, the supporters are going to be against AAR (or any new advertisers who are asking for changes?)

Personally, I can't seem to figure out the subtleties of saying the word - I hear it abuot seven times in a minute on some cable shows. I hear it a lot on DU. I didn't know I wasn't hearing it on radio. I'm confused. Malloy only does radio - right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. "Financial reasons" might have nothing to do with his salary —
it could be advertisers or FCC fines. (FCC has no jurisdiction for cable, which is why you can hear rougher language.)

You do realize that saying "FUCK" on the radio could get the FCC down on your neck and a station could lose its licence.

http://www.rwonline.com/reference-room/broadcast-law-review/2006.08.16-03_Rwm_cole_aug_16.shtml

Increased Indecency Fines Take Effect

Being indecent has become obscenely expensive.

by Harry F. Cole and Jeffrey J. Gee

President Bush recently signed the Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act, increasing the potential fines for broadcasting indecent material by a factor of 10. The former max - a mere pittance at $32,500 per violation - is history. Now you're looking at a much heftier $325,000 per violation, up to a limit of $3 million per day.

This massive increase in potential fines, along with an aggressive (and unpredictable) enforcement stance by the FCC, should inspire every broadcaster to review its programming and operations policies to minimize the risk that a stray off-color remark paints their balance sheet red.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. you heard either "cuts" or "suckerd" - I just listened to the archive.
Edited on Fri Sep-01-06 10:35 AM by helderheid
he was talking about dittoheads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. You're right. Thanks. I've been wondering this for days.
False alarm, everybody! Sorry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never_get_over_it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. A caller used the f-word
either last Thursday or Friday and it came across on the internet - but "they" hit the delay button and it didn't make it out over the air - I checked the archives on that one and the callers slip wasn't there - hopefully if Mike did say it they hit the delay button and it didn't make it out over the air waves
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. kathy would have hit the delay button if he did....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC