Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NAFTA Superhighway: good summary from Van Os campaign

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 04:38 AM
Original message
NAFTA Superhighway: good summary from Van Os campaign
Van Os has got some amazing volunteers! I made a donation and asked a question on their comment form, and this is what I got back--

Also, I noticed that you stated in the comment line on both messages that you want us to help you understand how to publicize this NAFTA Highway nationally and you mentioned how many west coast jobs are in trouble. I will gladly answer your questions to the best of my ability. I spend a lot of time working on the Trans Texas Corridor / NAFTA issues for David Van Os’s and Hank Gilbert’s campaigns.

I do not believe that we will be able to keep imports out of this country and I fear that we will continue losing jobs to off shore manufacturing. However, the Tran Texas Corridor /Kansas City Smart Port is definitely an initiative which is targeting American and Canadian longshoreman jobs. The Corporate powers behind this are targeting union jobs and are working to cut corporate labor expenses by shipping goods destined for the US and Canada from Asia to the Mexican ports. Instead of shipping to American ports, they are sending them to Mexico and shipping them north by truck or rail into a transit hub in Kansas City, Missouri. They could send these containers to an American or Canadian port and not pollute our air trucking them through Texas and Oklahoma but they prefer to use cheaper Mexican labor instead of better paid Union labor! I advise that you identify other interested activists, join with people such as representatives in the Longshoreman’s Union, write letters to the editor and work with us as we blog to make people across this nation aware of this issue. Share links to stories on the blogs with your friends and neighbors.

Another way that The TTC is impacting American jobs is in the loss of prime agricultural land. Corporations and many law makers think that farm land is not as important as urban land because it is “undeveloped”. It is necessary from many of us in the cities to begin uniting with our rural neighbors and standing up for them. In Texas for decades we have allowed urban dwellers to dominate the state election process, electing non-agricultural people as Agriculture Commissioner, and leaving the farmers and ranchers with an incompetent person in that key office who works counter to the best interest of the ranchers and farmers. We eat their food and drink their milk and fail to support them as they put the beans and potatoes on our dinner table. We must become allies with the farm communities in our states. If they try to implement transportation corridors east to west similar to this North-South TTC corridor, they will wreck havoc on the farm economies of every state in the nation!

The Trans Texas Corridor is only the first leg of a NAFTA transportation corridor that they want to criss-cross this nation. The first leg is Texas. Before many citizens in Texas became aware of it there had already been TTC enabling legislation passed in the Texas State Legislature. There was a constitutional amendment passed in 2001 allowing for the construction of toll roads. Most of us thought that was in reference to regional toll projects which previously had been initiated by local citizens, had much citizen input and was approved only after local vote. We did not dream that the purpose behind that amendment was for state/private toll roads which would not require local voters approval and would include private foreign owned corporations financing and receiving generous 50 year concessions and collections of toll fees set by those corporations without further governmental or local citizen oversight! We never imagined that it would also include utility pipelines which would run through most of this state’s rivers and aquifer! We never dreamed they were envisioning freeways which are the width of 12 football fields! We never dreamed that private 501c6 non-profit organizations would be used to as great an extent to lobby and co-opt local, county and state leaders while leaving the public completely out of the loop on this massive re-engineering of the private property and transportation infrastructure of this state. WATCH ANY PROPOSED AMENDMENT OR LAW THAT INVOLVES TOLL ROADS, MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION, OR PRIVATE/PUBLIC PARTNERSHIP IN PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS. If they propose private parties investing in public works projects and operating it for fees to receive a “reasonable return on their investment” scream holy murder! That means that you are agreeing to go in debt to a private company and allow them to charge you many times more over a long period of time what the actual cost of the investment truly is. It is only REPUBLICAN CODE for passing the debt on to future generations and allowing private corporations to make a killing at citizens’ expense.

I urge citizens of all states to watch for proposed changes to the Transportation Code of your state. Watch for financial contributions to elected officials and candidates from rail road companies and contractors who perform public works projects. Watch for members of NASCO who are elected officials on various levels of government in your state. Study the 501c6 transportation related non-profit organizations, visit their websites and examine their members, officers and board members, especially looking for elected officials and members of your state’s transportation agencies. This is how they move these initiatives forward. At this time Washington State is not the next leg of this network but if they get the TTC built, they will begin planning their national network.

Kansas City Southern Rail Road has an agreement with Canadian National Rail to service a port just north of Washington State. I cannot prove it, but having seen the aggressive nature of that corporation, I do not think they will be satisfied with that for long. Currently they have the shortest route from Mexico to Kansas City. However, they have fought to straighten that route and cut off rail miles by going directly through the richest farm belt of this state. They do not want to travel their current route that cuts from Dallas to the Louisiana border near Shreveport La and up through Arkansas. I suspect that they will want to gain access to the pacific ports. Currently they have access to all of the Texas ports, all of the Louisiana ports, Biloxi, MS and Atlanta, GA. Kansas City Southern Railroad now owns 100% of the largest railroad in Mexico and is a partner in the Panama Canal Railroad which runs parallel to the Panama Canal. I They have agreements with most of the other railroads in the USA. It probably won’t be long before they try to figure out how to serve the Pacific Rim without having to ship up through Canada. They’ll want to cut direct along the Pacific shore and will want access to all the Pacific Ports so that they’ll control them along with the southern ports on the Atlantic side. This corporation wants to dominate transportation in this hemisphere. am sending you a link to the presentation their Vice President gave in January 2006 at a transportation conference in Dallas. It shows the expansion of that corporation since 1992.

http://www.texasrailadvocates.org/Conf-Jan-2006/Presentations/final/Warren_Erdman_-_KCS/KCS.htm

The link to all the presentations at that seminar are located at:
http://www.texasrailadvocates.org/Conf-Jan-2006/registration.html

In Texas Democrats sold out to the Democratic Leadership Conference – pro corporate middle of the road Democrats – when Reagan was elected. Our state has been dominated by Republicans ever since. This year the grassroots has waken up and we are fighting to take our state and nation back. I hope that the candidates in your state who will really LISTEN to the people and who will BE HONEST and CONSISTENT will get support. It is not the size of a candidate’s wallet that matters. QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE JOB and ACCOUNTABILITY TO THE PEOPLE is what matters. For too long too many have been way too unaccountable.

I truly hope that the citizens of Washington State do not have to let things get as bad as they have become here for them to be alert and on guard. We have too many of the same political party in office here. There are not enough people keeping watch over the opposite party to give us the needed checks and balances. Unfortunately most of the few Democrats we have in office here have taken campaign contributions from the same corporate backers as the robber barons supporting Republicans! We have to clear out most incumbents of both parties.

Thank you for supporting David Van Os in his challenge to unseat Greg Abbott. David will fight for every citizen in the USA if he succeeds in winning in November. His opponent has 100 dollars to ever dollar David has. David has people behind him. Greg Abbott has corporations behind him. Most of David’s campaign is funded by small contributions from folks on limited income and who are barely making ends meet. This year all of the challengers on the Democratic ticket are reaching out to the people, listening, and telling the truth. It is a very different election cycle. At first the media refused to take any of the Democratic ticket serious. Now they are beginning to realize that the size of the bank account will not necessarily mean who will win this November. We have to identify honest people and fight to get them elected to public office in every town, county, and state in this nation. That is the only way we will be able to reclaim our nation. We tend to think that city and county offices aren’t that important. It was a real wake up call when I read the language of the TTC enabling legislation which stipulates that PUBLIC FREEWAYS CAN BE CONVERTED TO TOLL ROADS WITHOUT PUBLIC HEARNG OR VOTE IF THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS” COURT APPROVES. The County Judge elect in my county is on the NASCO BOARD OF DIRECTORS and is a strong backer of the TTC! He ran unopposed in the primary! I knew nothing about him except that he was a county commissioner serving a different part of the county and that his name appeared on the Republican Primary Ballot! We let him slip by!

Watch your county judge! The pattern is to get the County Judge’s to join these 501c6 non profit organizations, get them to take offices in them, and then they are part of the organization that “thinks” they are “formulating the transportation policy”. Actually they are buying into the positions of the KSC and other backers of the transportation corridors. When they return to their counties (or cities or state) bodies where they are supposed to represent the people and give fair and unbiased consideration to issues that come before it, they return as opinion leaders and stakeholders pushing to get the initiatives passed!

If there is any way I can be of assistance, please contact me.

Faith Chatham
Steering Committee David Van Os and Hank Gilbert Campaigns
DFW Coordinator David Van Os and Hank Gilbert Campaigns
TTC-NAFTA Research Group – Hank Gilbert Campaign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 05:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Coverting public highways to toll roads in addition to ultra high
gas prices. Another way to turning a profit. That and power are all these people ever think about. I'm getting really tired of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. This economy based on low transportation costs is not sustainable
...in any sense. That would be environmentally or economically. There will not be cheap petroleum to ship products all over the world in another 20 years or so. The economy will be depressed. Agricultural goods won't be shipped thousands of miles either. So why build new highways?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. great info, thanks eridani...........
This maybe answers a few questions about the Trans Texas Corridor.

From day one it never made sense to me why the corridor would stop at the Red River in North Central Texas. Maybe so everyone from Texas would have an easier drive to get to the Chickasaw's tacky Winstar Casino at exit #1 in Oklahoma?

At a TexDot public meeting about the Trans Texas Corridor early last year, I asked the nice rep guy, "Where does it go from here?" He stammered a lot and didn't have an answer to a very simple question.

Kansas City you say. NAFTA. Big Dog and Poppy Bush. It's all finally beginning to make sense.

Stupid useless environment destroyer thing is going through my little rural county, the natives are in an uproar. Just a guess but Mr Van Os could hold a town meeting here and pick up a 1000 former Republican voters in a few hours.

My county judge is the biggest weasel of them all, thanks for the tip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Please write to his campaign about that
I'm sure if he can't come, he'll send somebody else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. Bookmarking this thread
and K&R'ing.

Great resource.

Thanks eridani.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ERF Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wait till we start building pipelines to bring water from
Canada to the parched West and mid-West.

I am guessing around 2025.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Popol Vuh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. As a Longshoreman myself
Thanks for posting this. Yes this is certainly a subject of interest to our union (The ILWU).

For quite some time now the PMA (Pacific Maritime Association) has been looking to Mexico and even widening the Panama canal to dodge paying fair compensation to us longshoreman. I would get more into strategy and counter strategy with more of what's going on. But two things: One, as a Class-A Book longshoreman I swore an oath not to discuss matters concerning union issues. Two, for the reason we swear an oath - loose lips sink ships.

We have a contract coming up in July 2008. Needless to say we are all getting prepared for a fight. Its always reminded to everyone in our monthly meetings to get ready for 2008.

I would like to take this time to make a point about longshoreman pay/benefits. During our last contract negotiation when we were locked-out and then had the Taft Hartley imposed on us. I noticed a LOT of people (Democrats even) calling longshoreman greedy because of the good pay and benefits we make. I would just like to point-out that our pay only equals three cents on the dollar of what our labor produces. That is absolutely not greedy.

I know folks here are not the ones who are critical of longshore pay. But I just wanted to point that out for others who just read the DU.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fierce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. As a fellow union member,
as I always say, "My pay is negotiated. If the company couldn't pay it, they wouldn't sign."

Stay strong, brother, and don't apologize for what you bargain for at the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Not this kid
If other workers don't like their crappy pay, let's have more unions, not fewer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'm in Sugar Land. Where can I get a Van Os yard sign?
He's smart, his writing is concise, I like his politics, and 'Van Os' is Dutch so we have that in commmon too. WHAT'S NOT TO LOVE?

FYI 'van os' means 'of the Ox'. Sounds good & stubborn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Check the Texas state forum for his campaign link n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. Probably at the Dem office in Rosenberg
http://www.fortbenddemocrats.org/
(Meeting Sat the 19th 10AM if you're interested.)
(Hi, I'm in Richmond!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. THANKS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. hoping the neo cons will be kicked out of Mexico so the Mexicans

can control their own country instead of the bushmilhousegang.

this Mex. port and section of the super highway will hurt most Mexicans but enrich the neo con Mexicans.

question: what are Canadians doing about stopping the super highway into their country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-16-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. As someone in the Kansas City area - Go, Van Os! Go!
I've been involved in doing research (background and legal) to combat the NAFTA Superhighway. Around here the battles are concerning arterials and other connecting roadings. Our main battles have been around I-35, I-70, US-59 and the South Lawrence Trafficway (a triangle connecting I-70, K-10 and I-35). When I called HTNB a few years back on this I talked to an individual who was telling me that the plans called for special "truck only lanes" along some sections of the proposed Superhighway because the volume of truck traffic was expected to increase dramatically. She talked about 32 lanes of I-35 traffic around the Dallas-Fort Worth area and 16 lanes in the Kansas City area.

They are trying to do a portions of the project in segments. They're doing this to get around NEPA and state environmental laws. By segmenting portions of it state has to pay for it but what they are effectively trying to do is to defederalize those portions to get them around the more stringent federal requirements. They tried it here with the SLT but they were overruled in the 10th Circuit.

Don't forget to keep in mind tandem plans for connecting highways like I-70. These seemingly disparate projects are all part of one huge plan to redo our highway system and fuck over the unions. Basically the NAFTA Superhighway is I-35, north-south border-to-border. I-70 runs east-west, coast-to-coast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. H'mm. Do we need a DU group on this?
Or possibly something in the research section? Come to think of it, I'll crosspost it there right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC